👕 Chelsea Kits Thread

[whats happening 1,525]

owner, board, some supporters, players, coach (?), jerseys now....is there any part of this football club that is at least normal. lmao we are something else.

[Blue Armour 4,275]

3 hours ago, BlueLyon said:

Nike was giving City classic simple kits for years. Why the hell they have to fuck around with graphic design on ours...

This season kit is crap. Next season one looks poor too. 2017/18 was nice and if they did that one again but with white trim around sleeves and collar, it would be brilliant.

Well...some fashionista on the Chelsea management team is clearly approving these.

Probably thinking kit campaigns like "...made in Stamford Bridge" ..will resonate with fans and bring in the $$$

 

Regarding the kit itself, I'm hoping that just like the Adidas 'lion' emblem pajama top kit, the background graphics are not that visible when players actually wear them when playing. ( Doesn't our teal toothpaste 3'rd kit have similar background graphics? Don't think those are that visible)

Gotta remember, these kit leak photos are always taken under the worst camera lighting and make the kit look a lot worse than they actually are.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

1 hour ago, Blue Armour said:

Well...some fashionista on the Chelsea management team is clearly approving these.

Probably thinking kit campaigns like "...made in Stamford Bridge" ..will resonate with fans and bring in the $$$

 

Regarding the kit itself, I'm hoping that just like the Adidas 'lion' emblem pajama top kit, the background graphics are not that visible when players actually wear them when playing. ( Doesn't our teal toothpaste 3'rd kit have similar background graphics? Don't think those are that visible)

Gotta remember, these kit leak photos are always taken under the worst camera lighting and make the kit look a lot worse than they actually are.

Yeah our last adidas kit with those lions looked like pajama on first images, but it was actualy one of nicest in adidas era.

Maybe design on this one wont be as visible either. But one way or another, it lacks more white decals. And the socks shouldnt be blue.

[Vesper 28,716]

6 hours ago, ulsterchelsea said:

Happy with this now if this is true

that looks much better

but all these 'previews' look super fake

especially that HORRID home kit

 

[Vesper 28,716]

6 hours ago, ulsterchelsea said:

Although this fucking travesty appears to be more and more legit. That Nike logo has some weird 3D surround going on and looks too much to be a cheap fake imo. Honestly bar the holes in the bars in the roof of Stamford bridge can anyone identify ANYTHING else on that that's meant to be related to the bridge? 

my sweet fa is that fooking UGLY as fuckall

just hideous

what the hell were they thinking???????

it looks like cheap after swim type shirts sold by higglers at a dodgy Jamaican beach

[NikkiCFC 7,927]

Wow what is this?  We were first in many things back in the day. Now club is so bad at everything they do. Only top European club without proper and big enough stadium and now this jersey?  Must be a joke. Let's do something revolutionary. Club should try to make a sponsor deal with Gucci or Tom Ford or Givenchy. 

[NikkiCFC 7,927]

9 hours ago, ulsterchelsea said:

Happy with this now if this is true

Is Russian collar because of Roman? Or to piss English authorities? Lol

[DDA 9,689]

Who ever designs these kits must be a Tottenham fan because it is verging in taking the piss lol.

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

13 hours ago, ulsterchelsea said:

Although this fucking travesty appears to be more and more legit. That Nike logo has some weird 3D surround going on and looks too much to be a cheap fake imo. Honestly bar the holes in the bars in the roof of Stamford bridge can anyone identify ANYTHING else on that that's meant to be related to the bridge? 

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

My 10 year old LOVES the home shirt..... Kids are mad

[xPetrCechx 13,563]

Like a costume for halloween ...

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

13 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said:

How does the design process work with these, is it purely down to Nike (i.e. does the club have any say or influence over the designs and colours)?

Either way, surely you would canvass opinion from supporters, those who you're hoping to buy the kits.

Surely no one would have been sweet on this?!

 

 

They couldn't give a fuck about us mate. The annoyance is any of the other teams tops I've seen, albeit not confirmed, look decent enough. Why is this acceptable?

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

Look at those. Even the inter one I think is a bit iffy with the diagonal stripes in the middle but all in all decent plain shirts (my preference only). 

[Special Juan 27,419]

Some of them look like they have been puked up.

[ulsterchelsea 3,221]

2 hours ago, Special Juan said:

Some of them look like they have been puked up.

They're a hell of a lot better than what we're getting served

[Laylabelle 9,347]

We don't need something fancy just something nice!! What we're getting ain't nice 

[the wes 7,212]

 

[OneMoSalah 8,773]

14 minutes ago, the wes said:

 

Doesnt look that bad to be honest. Not the greatest but not the worst.