Fernando Torres

[zolayes 14,489]

no way would I give scumpool 50 mill ..it could strengthen them too much ..If Rafa was still there it might be different he would have wasted it ..

Dalglish might not .Also with our luck Torres would get long term injury ..Risk is too big.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Signing Torres might be a mistake. He's injury prone and we'd have to change systems to enable him to play.

[Laylabelle 9,534]

Wouldnt mind us signing him for 30,35 but plus a player no way!

[Badboy 1,526]

Anelka is better than Torres. He never get injured, he helps the team, if not with goals, with his passes and with his good movements around the pitch.

So 50m for a overrated striker plus Anelka is really stupid. If we include not Anelka, but Kalou in the deal will be OK, not because I think the spanish is worth 50m, but because I do believe that leting Kalou go is worth even more than that.

Torres is better then Anelka son !

[Bir_CFC 3,455]

It's kind of like when Essien scored that screamer vs Barcelona, he went straight to Mikel too.

That's cause before the game, Mikel told Essien that he has a feeling he'd score today. (Essien explained on "At home with Essien")

Probably same deal with Kalou today.

Mikel probably picks a random guy every game and tells him that so he can get free hugs.

[whinni09 37]

to much for a player like torres. hope chelsea says 40 million or nothing.. hope they'll get ganso and a player like sergio ramos in the summer instead of torres tbh

[diskoviolente 425]

first of all: whats with all this "he is not physical enough" - thing ? Have you actually seen Torres play ? He is musceling defenders like Vidic and Rio away, even Terry, if fully fit.

Next topic right away: in the past he didn´t have enough time to recover from his injuries and played through the pain barrier, pushed by Benitez because their simply was no other option.

A 60% fit Torres is still better than the rest of the Liverpools striking options. End of.

Rafa really ruined enough players, out of a humanistic impetus we should try to sign Nando ! Save a life everyday, like.

With Drogba and Anelka in the autumn of their Chelsea carreers Torres is the perfect player to fill the gap between the older strikers and the young guns.

He is in the middle, age wise, and if given the time on of the most lethal strikers you can have.

He is world class. End of.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

we'd have to change systems to enable him to play.

Is that a bad thing necessarily?

[Badboy 1,526]

to much for a player like torres. hope chelsea says 40 million or nothing.. hope they'll get ganso and a player like sergio ramos in the summer instead of torres tbh

Sergio Ramos, are you joking mate, the guy gets more red cards then Drogba scores goals

[chrismada9 1,948]

Anelka is better than Torres.

Dude, if you were to see the form of Anelka this season so far, you will find that statement isn't true!

[spuz 143]

I know someone who works at Anfield and from what he hears Torres is staying.

Disappointing Chelsea.

I could have told you that yesterday. Another JT,Lamps Gerrard,Rooney saga.

[Laylabelle 9,534]

All gone very quiet rumour wise...see whats said tommrow probably the obvious but hey ho

[J.F. 1,484]

any news about this?

[chrismada9 1,948]

Someone just tweeted this on Twitter, I don't know if this is just one person tweeting this however...

YES! News coming from Melwood that a fee close to 45 million + Anelka has been agreed for Torres. ( #cfc ) ( #lfc ) ( #Torres )

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

The last Twitter rumour suggested an announcement would be made between 7pm-8pm, so this one is probably bullshit as well.