Oscar

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

where has this myth come from that Oscar's 2nd half of the season has been terrible???

Stats aside he hasn't really played to the level we expect of him. He's not having as much of an impact on how we play as he once was... Its a lull in his form, I hope he gets back to his best soon

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Stats aside he hasn't really played to the level we expect of him. He's not having as much of an impact on how we play as he once was... Its a lull in his form, I hope he gets back to his best soon

he has had some good games and some bad games this year, the same can be said about almost every other player in the team, yet Oscar is the one who has apparentley gone missing. Complete Garbage.

[Barbara 15,149]

he has had some good games and some bad games this year, the same can be said about almost every other player in the team, yet Oscar is the one who has apparentley gone missing. Complete Garbage.

I agree with the notion he has weak/poor second halves of season, but I also agree with you to a small extent that he hasn't been as bad as people are making him out to be this particular second half. He's been okay, but then again, most of our attackers as you said have too. Cesc and Diego missed a few matches through injury, suspension (but then again, so did Oscar), Willian seemed to have picked some form since Cuadrado arrived - but hasn't played to that level the last two games imo (dropping a bit quality, no surprise he's been benched, he's definitely tired). Cuadrado is a non-factor, Remy and Drogba didn't play enough to be part of the argument. One could make a case for Hazard, but while he's had some very good matches this calendar year, he hasn't influenced in some others. As a team we've been poor in most of our presentations this calendar year, still people will only talk about Oscar... the players are tired - we had little rotation in the squad, our bench - especially midfielders - weren't in good form to come off the bench and change a game for us, quite the opposite, they were in bad form/condition technically or/and physically. Matic even admitted after one match they aren't robots. They ARE tired, there's no doubt about it and while I wish we had rotated more, when I looked to our bench and the kind of performances they had, I completely understood why Mourinho was reluctant. Schurrle and Ramires have been sick/injured for too long, both came back rusty. Salah more often than not was an horror show (which surprises me how he's doing so great at Fiorentina. He's missed some very stupid passes, linkups, and even goals while he was here). Who exactly would replace one between Oscar, Willian and Hazard? Not to mention all our strikers picked injuries too...

[Belgiannutt 3,201]

please explain how on earth Oscar has gone missing in the 2nd half of the season??? He has started 10 games and has 3 goals and 3 assists in 2015, plus some good performances where he wasnt rewarded with a goal or assist. yeah he has really gone missing hasnt he.

In fact in 2015 none of our attackers have been consistentley good so far, Ivanovic has made up for our inconsistent attackers in 2015 with some vital goals. So no Oscar hasnt gone missing at all, thats pure fantasy.

His performances haven't been good. If you can't see that then any further debating with you is just pointless.

[Styles 9,790]

I stopped reading when he said Oscar was good against Villa.

[Laugh1ngMan 393]

His performances haven't been good. If you can't see that then any further debating with you is just pointless.

It's funny when people here ask a genuine question like 'why are people judging Oscar to be poor', backing it up with arguments why this does not particularly seems to be the case. Only to be responded to with phrases like 'he's poor, it's a fact,' without any arguments whatsover and getting likes for it.

I'm not the biggest Oscar fan (his overall game on this level is just not up to par imo) but i understand his role in the team but I am genuinly confused about what exactly is so different from his performance the first half of the season and the second.

First half against West Ham for example was as good as i've seen him play during his 'better' first half of the season.

[Pacquiao 1,834]

His performances haven't been good. If you can't see that then any further debating with you is just pointless.

As i already said he has had some good games and some bad games in 2015. So for you to say he has gone missing in 2015 is ridiculous, and if you cant see that then any further debating with you is just pointless.

[Jase 43,479]

Reading this thread at times has made one feel rather 'meh'...

[Belgiannutt 3,201]

It's funny when people here ask a genuine question like 'why are people judging Oscar to be poor', backing it up with arguments why this does not particularly seems to be the case. Only to be responded to with phrases like 'he's poor, it's a fact,' without any arguments whatsover and getting likes for it.

I'm not the biggest Oscar fan (his overall game on this level is just not up to par imo) but i understand his role in the team but I am genuinly confused about what exactly is so different from his performance the first half of the season and the second.

First half against West Ham for example was as good as i've seen him play during his 'better' first half of the season.

I didn't say it was a fact. I said it would be pointless to debate it further because it's always going to come back to the same thing. I'm gonna say Oscar 's been poor, Pacquaio gonna say he was good.

We could throw arguments at each other but neither one of us is gonna change their mind.

Goals and assists don't equal good performance. For example the Newcastle game where he scored a goal and got an assist he was awful performance wise. Also his 3 goals and 2 assists this year have come in three games.

Tottenham : assist that wasn't really an assist but a shot at goal and his performance was poor. Newcastle : goal and assist but poor performance, Swansea : 2 goals this was a good 90 minute performance. 3 games he scored or assisted in and 2 of those he was poor, performance wise.

The other 7 games he wasn't good either. He was good in the first half against West Ham but he was again invisible in the second half.

[The Skipper 20,609]

As i already said he has had some good games and some bad games in 2015. So for you to say he has gone missing in 2015 is ridiculous, and if you cant see that then any further debating with you is just pointless.

He's had a lot more bad games in 2015 than good, not even arguable.

[Pacquiao 1,834]

He's had a lot more bad games in 2015 than good, not even arguable.

no he hasnt. He has started 10 games in 2015 and played well in at least 4 or 5 of them, so no he has not had a lot more bad games. not even arguable

[didierforever 7,349]

absolute LOL at some of the comments on here.

i mean is it wrong or vague to say that Cahill has had a poorer season this season than his previous one? i dont think so. IT IS A FACT. anyone who watches the game can see it for himself/herself. it is not a debate, it is not up for an argument. similarly, oscar has been poor in the second halves of the last 2 seasons, is not a debate. anyone who has watched chelsea matches knows that for a fact. and the same trend is been followed by him this season, if you cant see that, you are either an oscar fan rather than chelsea fan or you are simply an idiot.

[The Skipper 20,609]

I wouldn't adverse to selling Oscar and getting in a creative number 10 (who isn't tactically naive and obviously stil has decent work rate) in someone like Isco - and then let Willian be our defensive CAM/cover or competition for that RW spot.

[The Skipper 20,609]

no he hasnt. He has started 10 games in 2015 and played well in at least 4 or 5 of them, so no he has not had a lot more bad games. not even arguable

Name these 4/5 games he's played well in then?

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Name these 4/5 games he's played well in then?

Newcastle, Swansea, Liverpool and West Ham.