DONI. 1,291 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 did he really have 5000 followers before the incident happened?4000 or 5000 im not sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11668/8430608/FA-reviewing-footage-of-Eden-Hazard-red-card-at-Swansea?utm_source=TeamChelseaFC&utm_medium=twitterThe Football Association is reviewing the footage of Chelsea midfielder Eden Hazard's red card for kicking a ballboy at Swansea.The Belgium international was dismissed by referee Chris Foy after the incident during the closing stages of Wednesday's Capital One Cup semi-final, second leg match at the Liberty Stadium.The ballboy - 17-year-old Charlie Morgan - refused to hand over the ball after it had gone out for a goal-kick.Morgan fell to the ground as Hazard attempted to get the ball from him, with the player then trying to kick it from under him but appearing to instead make contact with the youngster.Hazard escaped criminal action over his conduct after Morgan and his father, Swansea director and hotel owner Martin, decided not to press charges.The 22-year-old also apologised to the teenager after the match.Hazard told Chelsea TV: "The boy put his whole body onto the ball and I was just trying to kick the ball and I think I kicked the ball and not the boy. I apologise."The ballboy came in the changing room and we had a quick chat and I apologised and the boy apologised as well, and it is over. Sorry." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Joey Barton has weighed into the debate surrounding last night's incident between Eden Hazard and a Swansea ball boy by claiming on Twitter: 'only crime is he hasn't kicked him hard enough'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushman 2,043 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Since we all know, Chelsea team is not very popular with FA, I expect much longer ban that 3 games by them.People are already comparing it to Cantone kicking the fan. He got 8 months, I believe.Well, anything can happen here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeboii 1,844 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 One reporter just saying that Hazard called the "boy" names and kicked him in the chest and what not. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Some idiots will soon come out claiming to be in favour of "ball boy rights" and Hazard should be given a long ban and sacked by Chelsea. Yawn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 He'll serve out the 3 game suspension and that's it. I don't think he'll get any more added punishment cause there is no intent on his part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Some idiots will soon come out claiming to be in favour of "ball boy rights" and Hazard should be given a long ban and sacked by Chelsea. Yawn.LOL, yeah i can see roman going for that... 32 mil signing has been sacked by chelsea for getting pissed of with a ball hogging ball boy... Sheva. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 He'll serve out the 3 game suspension and that's it. I don't think he'll get any more added punishment cause there is no intent on his part.That would be stuipid.Either Hazard should have his red card revoked or he should get a long ban. Why? Because if he indeed did nothing wrong, the red card is incorrect to give.I can understand the red card being given because the ball boy dived, and the ref obviousley gave it to prevent the stadium to go nuts, but after hand when the situation is reviewed and they come to the conclusion that he didnt hit the boy and whatnot, why would he still have the red card? It just doesnt make sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super_frank8 186 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 It just doesnt make sense.When it comes to the FA - it never does mate...Obviously if all logic & reason were to prevail, the card would be rescinded. However, I think we all just have to hope that the club will actually defend him in the media to minimise any suspension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouNameIt 1,511 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 When it comes to the FA - it never does mate...True dat. Was just pointing out the obvious and my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONI. 1,291 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Suspended for 3 matches Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Suspended for 3 matchesSource? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONI. 1,291 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Source?Chelsea TVhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX9Mi_kqIKE&feature=youtu.be&a xPetrCechx 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Isn't that a standard ban triggered by the card? Or is it the real ban, and we hear nothing more about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Uzzi 54 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 My goodness this is hilarious. Especially the images of the boy claiming to be injured on the pitch.I put it almost on the same level as Zidane headbutting Materazzi. Great stuff as well, except that it was really the stuff of legend, it being the very last act of his whole footballing career.Great players have to do crazy stuff from time to time, it's like that. Still, I really believe that this was unintentional. Nothing more frustrating and irritating than somebody keeping the ball from you and time waisting while you want to keep on playing. He just wanted to kick it from under his body, that's all there is to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,570 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Chelsea TVhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX9Mi_kqIKE&feature=youtu.be&aOnly 3- good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rmpr 8,977 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Isn't that a standard ban triggered by the card? Or is it the real ban, and we hear nothing more about it?Automatic ban from a straight red card, we must wait to see with the FA is going to decide to give him more matches... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Chelsea TVhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX9Mi_kqIKE&feature=youtu.be&aThink that was reported before the news came out about FA reviewing the incident.No official word that Hazard will serve just a 3-match ban yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmin 2,484 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Too many pussies in football. No ofense to the ladies, but this is fucking frustrating. Eden should've hit that twat in his 17 y old mangina. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.