Eden Hazard

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

3 minutes ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

I think that's part of the problem... He's reached great heights but can't consistently sustain it.

Eden is far from our problem. Majority of games he's played in I'd say were positive games. Good games. Amazing games. He's not Oscar. But he won't have outstanding performance in every game. Once he has poor game we immediately drop points. That's disgrace for our club that we're so relying on him. Look, his dribbling was way off on Sunday, but his acceleration was there, he was eager, I counted to 5 the times he instigated an action and wanted to receive a ball but there was nothing. We played one combination on Sunday, in the first half, in triangle and Matic only had to pass forward ball and Eden would be through on goal, but nah he passed a bit backward and the move was off. Diego Costa could pass through ball twice to Eden and he would be clear on goal but nothing came. We only have one passer in the team who sits on the bench. Eden's dribbling has to be on point in every game to create some moves because he won't receive anything with the moves he initiates.

To illustrate this, look.

That's not Swansea but it's what I'm talking about. Eden initiated several moves in that half and should have had a hat-trick for that but he only received one semi-decent ball back and he scored a goal. That's the problem. If he could receive balls on point from the moves he starts, he is 30 goals player. Nothing in the world will convince me otherwise. Suarez/Benzema as his striker partnership would make him deadly. Drogba was 37 years old but he's the best Eden had as his link up play was on point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTziWaIDgy4

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

3 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

Eden is far from our problem. Majority of games he's played in I'd say were positive games. Good games. Amazing games. He's not Oscar. But he won't have outstanding performance in every game. Once he has poor game we immediately drop points. That's disgrace for our club that we're so relying on him. Look, his dribbling was way off on Sunday, but his acceleration was there, he was eager, I counted to 5 the times he instigated an action and wanted to receive a ball but there was nothing. We played one combination on Sunday, in the first half, in triangle and Matic only had to pass forward ball and Eden would be through on goal, but nah he passed a bit backward and the move was off. Diego Costa could pass through ball twice to Eden and he would be clear on goal but nothing came. We only have one passer in the team who sits on the bench. Eden's dribbling has to be on point in every game to create some moves because he won't receive anything with the moves he initiates.

To illustrate this, look.

That's not Swansea but it's what I'm talking about. Eden initiated several moves in that half and should have had a hat-trick for that but he only received one semi-decent ball back and he scored a goal. That's the problem. If he could receive balls on point from the moves he starts, he is 30 goals player. Nothing in the world will convince me otherwise. Suarez/Benzema as his striker partnership would make him deadly. Drogba was 37 years old but he's the best Eden had as his link up play was on point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTziWaIDgy4

Not worth rebutting until you get his nutsack out your mouth.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

11 minutes ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Not worth rebutting until you get his nutsack out your mouth.

? Comment the Tottenham clip I just posted please. And don't answer one liner in the future to the posts because you look like troll.

 

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

4 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

? Comment the Tottenham clip I just posted please. And don't answer one liner in the future to the posts because you look like troll.

 

Comment on the Tottenham game? *rolls eyes*

He was brilliant, the problem with that is we saw that sort of form far too few times last year. And when you highlight his one brilliant game last year you look like a fanboy.

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

2 hours ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Comment on the Tottenham game? *rolls eyes*

He was brilliant, the problem with that is we saw that sort of form far too few times last year. And when you highlight his one brilliant game last year you look like a fanboy.

I only picked the Tottenham game because I wanted to make a point about the moves he initiates yet nothing comes off them because the next pass is so lame. This video presents it's nicely. 1:01 and 1:37. That's it. And there's usually a few times a match it happens.

Anyway, forget it, I don't want to discuss about Eden with you. You were the one that said something like "We are lucky if we'd get 30m for him in the summer". I remember it clearly. I want everyone to see it. Absolutely mental note. Pff. Shame on you.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

4 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

I only picked the Tottenham game because I wanted to make a point about the moves he initiates yet nothing comes off them because the next pass is so lame. This video presents it's nicely. 1:01 and 1:37. That's it. And there's usually a few times a match it happens.

Anyway, forget it, I don't want to discuss about Eden with you. You were the one that said something like "We are lucky if we'd get 30m for him in the summer". I remember it clearly. I want everyone to see it. Absolutely mental note. Pff. Shame on you.

Why don't you look up Hazard vs Porto away or the many times last season he was piss poor and ineffectual? You use clips from the 2nd last game of the season to make a point? LOL...

And if you read what I said correctly you would see I said "On current form he wasn't worth more than 30M" 

[Blue Colored Sky 1,807]

1 minute ago, Chelsea Legend 11 said:

Why don't you look up Hazard vs Porto away or the many times last season he was piss poor and ineffectual? You use clips from the 2nd last game of the season to make a point? LOL...

And if you read what I said correctly you would see I said "On current form he wasn't worth more than 30M" 

What the hell, I want to make a broad point you want to pick up single matches. Last season is disgrace for all Chelsea Football Club, for all players. Willian was our Player of The Year. It never gets worse than that.

What you said is disgrace anyway. How fickle you have to be to jump on a guy, not a club in a season which every player was piss poor and think that at the age of 25 he won't recover. Sissoko from Championship is worth 30m. You have to either be braindead or have some agenda to jump on single player and not 20 players.

 

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

5 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said:

What the hell, I want to make a broad point you want to pick up single matches. Last season is disgrace for all Chelsea Football Club, for all players. Willian was our Player of The Year. It never gets worse than that.

What you said is disgrace anyway. How fickle you have to be to jump on a guy, not a club in a season which every player was piss poor and think that at the age of 25 he won't recover. Sissoko from Championship is worth 30m. You have to either be braindead or have some agenda to jump on single player and not 20 players.

 

lol... what's hilarious your level 9 fanboy posts. What you will always get from me ALWAYS is the badge before anyone else and everything else. If a player, no matter how good he can be, comes to Chelsea and performs well below their level and looks disinterested in fighting for the club you will ALWAYS find me criticizing the commitment. 

I'm glad he looks more into it this year because if he is on his game Chelsea wins... That's all I care about.

[The Skipper 20,593]

Hazard had a bad game, doesn't make him a bad player...

[robsblubot 3,502]

And he did have a pretty bad game.

Completely clueless as to when to pass and when to finish, doing the wrong thing or neither most of the time.

The resolute fans complain he did not receive the ball, but for a great player (that he is) he's not that great finisher, so I'd be far more interested in how many passes HE MADE. And that is where he disappointed me... perhaps he was a bit selfish having had a great game before, and tried too hard to solve the problems on his own.

However, that's what great players must have: the discernment as to what to do at a particular time to best help the team.

[Mceachran 109]

On 9/15/2016 at 2:15 AM, Robguima said:

And he did have a pretty bad game.

Completely clueless as to when to pass and when to finish, doing the wrong thing or neither most of the time.

The resolute fans complain he did not receive the ball, but for a great player (that he is) he's not that great finisher, so I'd be far more interested in how many passes HE MADE. And that is where he disappointed me... perhaps he was a bit selfish having had a great game before, and tried too hard to solve the problems on his own.

However, that's what great players must have: the discernment as to what to do at a particular time to best help the team.

totally agree with your last sentence.  And someone said something about wishing he had the mentality of sanchez, but I think sanchez suffers from a lack of discernment, so i'm happy we have a slightly more humble player.

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,919]

When his form goes our attack is pretty much dead.

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

Poor performance. Clyne had him in his pocket the entire game. 

Don't know why he didn't switch with Willian to have a go at Milner.

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,919]

3 minutes ago, Blue-in-me-Veins said:

Poor performance. Clyne had him in his pocket the entire game. 

Don't know why he didn't switch with Willian to have a go at Milner.

There was a point where you could see Clyne tear the will out of him. He knew he couldnt beat him, and he looked like he quit. 

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Said it prematch, we win if he shows up... That's back to back matches where he was invisible. Not good enough when he's supposed to be our best player. I just can't tolerate watching him play when he isn't dictating play, it's just awful to watch him look pedestrian.

There are two types of players, one who represents a thermometer(someone who follows the climate of the game) and the other is the thermostat who dictates the temperature of the fixture.

Hazard, in my eyes, is a thermometer and not a thermostat. He doesn't take over games he responds to the game; reactive not active.

[Styles 9,790]

Honestly, if I was Hazard I would ask my agent to get me the fuck out of Chelsea asap.

[Sir Mikel OBE 4,919]

9 minutes ago, Styles said:

Honestly, if I was Hazard I would ask my agent to get me the fuck out of Chelsea asap.

Why?

[Styles 9,790]

5 minutes ago, Sir Mikel OBE said:

Why?

I wouldn't want to waste my prime years.