Wishlist Hulk

[Duppy Conqueror 1,536]

Terrible logic. Did you forget we also have Cahill who can cover for CB?

Oscar is not a RW has never played at RW and is terribly suited for RW so that's a terrible point/assumption. Ramires is not a RW, and has proven over and over again that he is ineffective when playing at RW.

De Bruyne is going on loan.

Hazard splits time at LW and in the hole and is also not a RW nor will he play there.

Putting Marin at RW will leave us with the same dilemma we had last season with no true RW as he'd be playing out of position there.

The bottomline is we already have a quality, dependable starter at RB and none at RW so RW is by far the more pressing need.

you start that post with terrible logic. i guess that must have been the headline to your post after what followed.

Branislav is the starter RB who covers CB. CB is a position where atleast 2 players take the field. the starting 2 of Luiz and Terry often get injured and miss games. so we have Cahill of course i haven`t forgotten him. have you forgotten that despite having Cahill, Bran had to go back to playing CB at times last season as he had to in previous years when we had Alex..

1viable option in a defensive position is not enough. again when he also covers the CB.

we have multiple options who can fill in at RW. it`s not as important to have a dependable player at RW than it is RB nor CB. we won the European Cup and F.A.cup. without what you would class as a true RW.

you really haven`t seen Oscar very often i understand that so don`t go around bippin`about what he can and can`t do. you are mistaken.

De Bruyne can either stay or be recalled from loan.

a right footed winger being unable to play the right wing. of course they can. it`s not all about cutbacks and shooting on your inside foot. whilst LW may be their better position of the two that`s not to say they can`t be relied upon to do a job on the RW.

RB is the more pressin` need.

[November33rd 84]

you start that post with terrible logic. i guess that must have been the headline to your post after what followed.

Branislav is the starter RB who covers CB. CB is a position where atleast 2 players take the field. the starting 2 of Luiz and Terry often get injured and miss games. so we have Cahill of course i haven`t forgotten him. have you forgotten that despite having Cahill, Bran had to go back to playing CB at times last season as he had to in previous years when we had Alex..

1viable option in a defensive position is not enough. again when he also covers the CB.

we have multiple options who can fill in at RW. it`s not as important to have a dependable player at RW than it is RB nor CB. we won the European Cup and F.A.cup. without what you would class as a true RW.

you really haven`t seen Oscar very often i understand that so don`t go around bippin`about what he can and can`t do. you are mistaken.

De Bruyne can either stay or be recalled from loan.

a right footed winger being unable to play the right wing. of course they can. it`s not all about cutbacks and shooting on your inside foot. whilst LW may be their better position of the two that`s not to say they can`t be relied upon to do a job on the RW.

RB is the more pressin` need.

Signing a player to fill a need as a backup isn't more important than signing a player to fill a need at starter. End of story.

[zolayes 14,489]

Signing a player to fill a need as a backup isn't more important than signing a player to fill a need at starter. End of story.

very clever to cross out his post like that . IT DOESN'T cancell out the logic that we NEED a RB ...

[Hutcho 8,443]

Signing a player to fill a need as a backup isn't more important than signing a player to fill a need at starter. End of story.

We don't need to fill a starter position atm... Technically speaking the right side of a 3 in a 4-2-3-1, is more of a RAM than a RW, and Hazard and Marin can play RW, it the same as left wing except they are encouraged to cross as oppossed to cut inside, though Hazard is really "both footed", so can still cut insdide on the right. I agree Ramiries best position definately isn't there but, 38 million is a lot of money when we have a starting team already tbh. Therefore, we have lots of Attacking players, so we need a backup rb more importantly, as i don't want to be relying upon Paulo.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

You are all expecting Hulk to be some kind of Iniesta or something because you have hyped the shit outta him here on the forums. He's an excellent player and if he would join Chelsea, with the type of players we've got now, he'd be even better. That said, I wouldnt be devastated if we didnt get him, but then I sure hope we spend those money wisely...

[Duppy Conqueror 1,536]

@ younameit we aren`t all doing anything it`s a forum with varied opinions on everything including Hulk.

[blue_swaggin_96 96]

hulk is physical beast that we must have!

[November33rd 84]

very clever to cross out his post like that . IT DOESN'T cancell out the logic that we NEED a RB ...

Never disagreed that we need a RB. We definitely do. Just not more than we need a true RW.

[MikeyBlue 11]

BBC opening ceremony: 'Mexico' mexico men's football has the marvellous Porto

striker Hulk..I'm told he's incredible' 'yeah he's a very goood player.'.

Tits

[Wise 45]

yet another average performance from Hulk yesterday im still wondering what people see in him! a Striker and RB should be our last 2 signings this window! NO Hulk!!!

Played out of position. He is a right forward, lethal when cutting inside with his powerful shot. I don't know why they don't just play Hulk on the right, Oscar middle and Neymar left.

[AndersonBLUE 819]

You guys reckon this will go to deadline day or will Chelsea FC wrap up business elsewhere before then

[Cz4rny1337 24]

Moses + 20-25m Striker > Hulk for at least 35m.

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

The only thing is we would be stalling Moses's career.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

Moses + 20-25m Striker > Hulk for at least 35m.

Nah. There is no striker for 20-25m that we should buy.

[Cz4rny1337 24]

Lewnadowski, Rondon, Doumbia, Bas Dost?

[KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607]

Lewnadowski, Rondon, Doumbia, Bas Dost?

Lewandowski is the only good-ish one.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

Lewnadowski, Rondon, Doumbia, Bas Dost?

Are you serious that ud rather have Moses+Lewandowski than Hulk? There is absolutley no logic in that what so ever..

[Leif 6,006]

He looked meh against Egypt in my opinion.

He wasn't very cool-headed, got frustrated easily, surprisingly went down too easily at times, and lacked a good work-rate. I felt as if he was playing for himself instead of playing for his team.

I hope his next performance is better.

[St Abramovich 175]

We should chuck in a cheeky bid for Neymar, he can't cost much more than Hulk.

[Cz4rny1337 24]

Are you serious that ud rather have Moses+Lewandowski than Hulk? There is absolutley no logic in that what so ever..

Hulk 26y, last season he scored only 10 goals from game for club. 11 are from pen or FK. : |||. [Lewandowski 24y, 31 goals in better league] And he will be our striker? Club want goals, we have creativity, now we need some1 to score goals. Just that. If Torres fails, and Danny will still have bad form we are without striker for 6 months.

All that strikers have alot of goals and can be second strikers before Nando. Doumbia is great choose imo.

Hulk have muscles but he dont know how use it. He loose ball, fall down and cry for free kick. When he use his muscles in Egypt game it was foul. You must know how to use your body build without faul. He is not worth 35m, and Porto want milk us for sth around 40m pounds. I hope we won't buy him.