Politics & Stuff

[Atomiswave 6,118]

19 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Yup think the tide is turning and as for their propaganda most people see right through it now. So many politicians have been destroyed because they condemn the suppression of the Palestinians.

Anti-Semitism - Its A Trick : We Always Use It - YouTube

Israeli Minister

Did you see the clip where netanyaho were caught saying that the US is their dog, that they control them.

Edited May 16, 2021 by Atomiswave

[Fulham Broadway 17,333]

8 minutes ago, Atomiswave said:

Did you see the clip where netanyaho were caught saying that the US is their dog, that they control them.

Nah didnt see that -is there a clip ?

They receive $3 billion from the U.S. annually, and has over the last decade, making it the "largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II," according to an August 2019 report by the Congressional Research Service. That amount is going to go up, too.

[Atomiswave 6,118]

Just now, Fulham Broadway said:

Nah didnt see that -is there a clip ?

They receive $3 billion from the U.S. annually, and has over the last decade, making it the "largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II," according to an August 2019 report by the Congressional Research Service. That amount is going to go up, too.

Thats only from US, look how much Germany has given them year after year. I will try and find the clip, I think youtube banned it.

[Atomiswave 6,118]

7 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Nah didnt see that -is there a clip ?

BAnned from YT and cant even find it on bitchute, my brother will dig it up and I'll upload it

[Vesper 30,224]

[chippy 342]

The Spanish government is in the processs of deporting 6000 migrants, but for some reason the silence is defening from the lefties and human rights lobby???

One can only imagine the condemnation if it was the UK or USA  doing something like this. We can't even deport 100 criminal scum without  certain groups doing everything they can to stop it.

Australia get away with it too. Just simply sending migrants straight back to where they came from, which resulted in them very quickly stopping people trying to enter illegally.

China, Japan,  India, all of Eastern Europe and many other countries do not have and do want mass migration into their countries and yet the two most welcoming and multi racial countries in the world are the ones that are called out.

I guess its just another example of the massive hypocrisy one comes to expect.

 

 

[Atomiswave 6,118]

12 minutes ago, chippy said:

The Spanish government is in the processs of deporting 6000 migrants, but for some reason the silence is defening from the lefties and human rights lobby???

One can only imagine the condemnation if it was the UK or USA  doing something like this. We can't even deport 100 criminal scum without  certain groups doing everything they can to stop it.

Australia get away with it too. Just simply sending migrants straight back to where they came from, which resulted in them very quickly stopping people trying to enter illegally.

China, Japan,  India, all of Eastern Europe and many other countries do not have and do want mass migration into their countries and yet the two most welcoming and multi racial countries in the world are the ones that are called out.

I guess its just another example of the massive hypocrisy one comes to expect.

 

 

Same here in Denmark, sending folks home by force, though many have been here for 10 years without an answer, fucking criminal. Imagine being in a prison like system for 10 years and then get told you sir will not be living here.....human rights you say? Its just a name.

[chippy 342]

21 minutes ago, Atomiswave said:

Same here in Denmark, sending folks home by force, though many have been here for 10 years without an answer, fucking criminal. Imagine being in a prison like system for 10 years and then get told you sir will not be living here.....human rights you say? Its just a name.

I've heard a lot about issues in Sweden but this is the first I've ever read anything like that about Denmark. Quite shocked tbh.

Anyone, providing they've never commited a serious crime, should be allowed to stay after 10 years. The UK has such a huge backlog of asylum cases and a least a couple of million illegal immigrants, making it almost impossible to ever clear up, which is why Boris Johnson would like there to be an amnesty for all of them and start afresh, with stricter enforcement of those entering illegally and much faster decisions on anyone who manages to slip through but then caught later. 

 

 

 

[Atomiswave 6,118]

11 minutes ago, chippy said:

I've heard a lot about issues in Sweden but this is the first I've ever read anything like that about Denmark. Quite shocked tbh.

Anyone, providing they've never commited a serious crime, should be allowed to stay after 10 years. The UK has such a huge backlog of asylum cases and a least a couple of million illegal immigrants, making it almost impossible to ever clear up, which is why Boris Johnson would like there to be an amnesty for all of them and start afresh, with stricter enforcement of those entering illegally and much faster decisions on anyone who manages to slip through but then caught later. 

 

 

 

Yeah its a shit show man, either deport them on the spot so that they can try their chances elswhere or you fucking give them asylum. Ohh yeah its crap here on that front, I know many who were forced to leave after years of hardship.....its rotten.

[chippy 342]

7 hours ago, Atomiswave said:

Yeah its a shit show man, either deport them on the spot so that they can try their chances elswhere or you fucking give them asylum. Ohh yeah its crap here on that front, I know many who were forced to leave after years of hardship.....its rotten.

Its also time the Oil rich countries  who are shitting money, started doing their bit to home some of these poor people, especially their Muslim brothers and sisters. 

[Atomiswave 6,118]

15 hours ago, chippy said:

Its also time the Oil rich countries  who are shitting money, started doing their bit to home some of these poor people, especially their Muslim brothers and sisters. 

LMAO come'now mate your dreaming. If that was the case then Palistine wouldnt suffer for so long, instead them khalij arab countries love to suck on Israel, kissing their asses at every corner. Why do have so many countless people and children dying of starvation witrh no water etc all around the world, instead they would rather bolster their militaries etc....this world is run by satanic evil scumbags end of.

[chippy 342]

8 hours ago, Atomiswave said:

LMAO come'now mate your dreaming. If that was the case then Palistine wouldnt suffer for so long, instead them khalij arab countries love to suck on Israel, kissing their asses at every corner. Why do have so many countless people and children dying of starvation witrh no water etc all around the world, instead they would rather bolster their militaries etc....this world is run by satanic evil scumbags end of.

I wouldn't go quite as far as you in condemning all the worlds leaders.

The UK, France, Germany, Sweden and the USA, have all have all done their bit in terms of allowing large numbers of poor, unskilled immigrants and asylum seekers to settle in their countries. That is a very small number of countries though.

 

Anyway, just thought I'd bring you latest example of the acceptable racism from the anti racist  Lefties.

Chicago's Mayor has decided to not speak to white news reporters. If any Conservative in the USA or UK, said they'd only talk to white reporters, their career would be over the day the say said it, and rightly so!  Not a word from Biden or Harris, which says everything about those hypocritical pieces of trash.

 

[Vesper 30,224]

2 hours ago, chippy said:

 

Chicago's Mayor has decided to not speak to white news reporters. If any Conservative in the USA or UK, said they'd only talk to white reporters, their career would be over the day the say said it, and rightly so!  Not a word from Biden or Harris, which says everything about those hypocritical pieces of trash.

 

you are a racist berk

would not be shocked at all if you are ex National Action and/or presently in The British Hand

so fucking sick of you having go after go at us BAME folk

you are also obsessed with this 'left' bogeyman

you are a tiny little troll with a tiny little brainwashed worldview filled with Fox News, BNP, and QMAGAt gaslit fever dreams

now sod off back to having a wank to your Katie Hopkins autographed photo 

 

Chicago mayor’s decision to only speak to journalists of colour is commendable, not racist

Lori Lightfoot’s stand is not against white reporters, but in favour of their Black and brown peers

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/lori-lightfoot-chicago-mayor-racism-b1850451.html

 

Chicago’s mayor, Lori Lightfoot, has announced that she’ll only be taking interviews regarding her last two years in office from journalists of colour. In a letter to Chicago media outlets, Lightfoot wrote, “In the time since I was elected, our country has faced an historic reckoning around systemic racism. In looking at the absence of diversity across the City Hall press corps and other newsrooms, sadly it does not appear that many of the media institutions in Chicago have caught on and truly have not embraced this moment.”

Naturally, social media went into a whirlwind. Right wing media and provocateurs are claiming that Lightfoot refusing to speak to white journalists is racism, but I, and most sensible people, would argue it is anything but. It is not a racist action to attempt to promote equity, especially when newsrooms maintain an environment that only comprises 17% of non-white staff, and 13% of non-white leadership. What is racist? The right wing men comparing Lightfoot’s natural hair to Beetlejuice because you disagree with her policy decisions. As a Black and Native American writer living in Harlem, I find Lori Lightfoot’s demands to only speak with journalists of colour rather reasonable, and more importantly, commendable.

Lightfoot’s decision is a move to showcase journalists in Chicago who understand – or at least can sympathize with – her lived experience as a person of colour in the region and who will write accessibly for her constituents. With newsrooms and journalism being so overwhelmingly white, and I mean that literally, to refuse to engage with white, male writers who can not fundamentally understand who she is governing for, is not a radical position. It’s sensible, and the right-wing media’s reaction shows us why.

Black and brown journalists are routinely passed over for major opportunities because of the whiteness of news media, and Lightfoot refused to participate in or allow that in the upcoming interviews about her past two years in office as Chicago Mayor. Lightfoot made her line of thinking clear, saying: “It’s a shame that in 2021, the City Hall press corps is overwhelmingly White in a city where more than half of the city identifies as Black, Latino, AAPI or Native American.” By refusing to speak to press outside of those communities, Lightfoot is assuring that Chicago’s journalists of colour are getting the attention and work they deserve.

You can say what you want about Lori Lightfoot. You may not agree with her policies or politics, but she is personally assuring that Black and brown people in the media have a voice, platform, and the opportunity to interact with and interview her.

The issue here isn’t about Lightfoot herself not wanting to speak to white journalists, as right wing media would like you to believe, but the fact that Black and brown journalists are equally capable and equally as deserving as their white peers and counterparts, but get half the attention. This isn’t an anti-white policy, but a pro-POC one.

Media workers of colour should be awarded the chance to showcase their skills in a sea of whiteness, as Black and brown media workers have perspectives that have been influenced by racism, discrimination, and living while being a person of colour, and the people of Chicago need accessible and attainable information that pertains to their life.

Who better to cover it than their own community?

[chippy 342]

6 hours ago, Vesper said:

you are a racist berk

would not be shocked at all if you are ex National Action and/or presently in The British Hand

so fucking sick of you having go after go at us BAME folk

you are also obsessed with this 'left' bogeyman

you are a tiny little troll with a tiny little brainwashed worldview filled with Fox News, BNP, and QMAGAt gaslit fever dreams

now sod off back to having a wank to your Katie Hopkins autographed photo 

 

Chicago mayor’s decision to only speak to journalists of colour is commendable, not racist

Lori Lightfoot’s stand is not against white reporters, but in favour of their Black and brown peers

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/lori-lightfoot-chicago-mayor-racism-b1850451.html

 

Chicago’s mayor, Lori Lightfoot, has announced that she’ll only be taking interviews regarding her last two years in office from journalists of colour. In a letter to Chicago media outlets, Lightfoot wrote, “In the time since I was elected, our country has faced an historic reckoning around systemic racism. In looking at the absence of diversity across the City Hall press corps and other newsrooms, sadly it does not appear that many of the media institutions in Chicago have caught on and truly have not embraced this moment.”

Naturally, social media went into a whirlwind. Right wing media and provocateurs are claiming that Lightfoot refusing to speak to white journalists is racism, but I, and most sensible people, would argue it is anything but. It is not a racist action to attempt to promote equity, especially when newsrooms maintain an environment that only comprises 17% of non-white staff, and 13% of non-white leadership. What is racist? The right wing men comparing Lightfoot’s natural hair to Beetlejuice because you disagree with her policy decisions. As a Black and Native American writer living in Harlem, I find Lori Lightfoot’s demands to only speak with journalists of colour rather reasonable, and more importantly, commendable.

Lightfoot’s decision is a move to showcase journalists in Chicago who understand – or at least can sympathize with – her lived experience as a person of colour in the region and who will write accessibly for her constituents. With newsrooms and journalism being so overwhelmingly white, and I mean that literally, to refuse to engage with white, male writers who can not fundamentally understand who she is governing for, is not a radical position. It’s sensible, and the right-wing media’s reaction shows us why.

Black and brown journalists are routinely passed over for major opportunities because of the whiteness of news media, and Lightfoot refused to participate in or allow that in the upcoming interviews about her past two years in office as Chicago Mayor. Lightfoot made her line of thinking clear, saying: “It’s a shame that in 2021, the City Hall press corps is overwhelmingly White in a city where more than half of the city identifies as Black, Latino, AAPI or Native American.” By refusing to speak to press outside of those communities, Lightfoot is assuring that Chicago’s journalists of colour are getting the attention and work they deserve.

You can say what you want about Lori Lightfoot. You may not agree with her policies or politics, but she is personally assuring that Black and brown people in the media have a voice, platform, and the opportunity to interact with and interview her.

The issue here isn’t about Lightfoot herself not wanting to speak to white journalists, as right wing media would like you to believe, but the fact that Black and brown journalists are equally capable and equally as deserving as their white peers and counterparts, but get half the attention. This isn’t an anti-white policy, but a pro-POC one.

Media workers of colour should be awarded the chance to showcase their skills in a sea of whiteness, as Black and brown media workers have perspectives that have been influenced by racism, discrimination, and living while being a person of colour, and the people of Chicago need accessible and attainable information that pertains to their life.

Who better to cover it than their own community?

I know full well the pathetic excuse she gave.

This pro POC not anti white shit is exactly what the KKK say about themselves just being pro white.

As I've said over and over, there are many non whites who are against the extreme Left, BLM/Antifa and see their dangerous, devisive ideology for what it is. These people are being called out as Uncle Toms, which again says everything about the extremism of many of today's Left.

Do yourself a favour and go onto YouTube for an hour and watch some interviews with Thomas Sowell, an elderly Black Ametican economist, social theorist and senior fellow st Stanford Uni. See what he has to say on the Left and BLM.

He's a great, extremly wise old man, but probably just another Uncle Tom to the likes of you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[chippy 342]

And btw. 

The National Association of Black Journalists are against the Mayor on this.

Not that there should even be Associations based on peoples skin colour, but that's a different argument.

 

Charles Whitaker, dean at Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern Uni. said "We would never, ever in a million years allow that of a white politician. And so it's dangerous now to say we are going to allow that of Black politician simply to make a point about the historic inequities in media."

 

 

 

 

 

[Vesper 30,224]

1 hour ago, chippy said:

I know full well the pathetic excuse she gave.

This pro POC not anti white shit is exactly what the KKK say about themselves just being pro white.

As I've said over and over, there are many non whites who are against the extreme Left, BLM/Antifa and see their dangerous, devisive ideology for what it is. These people are being called out as Uncle Toms, which again says everything about the extremism of many of today's Left.

Do yourself a favour and go onto YouTube for an hour and watch some interviews with Thomas Sowell, an elderly Black Ametican economist, social theorist and senior fellow st Stanford Uni. See what he has to say on the Left and BLM.

He's a great, extremly wise old man, but probably just another Uncle Tom to the likes of you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

Thomas 'there is no such as systemic racism' Sowell? LOLOL

of course you would drag in a cooning step n' fetchit into this

that shitehawk actually argues FOR letting segregation  become legal again and rips the yank SCOTUS's foundational civil rights ruling Brown v Board of Education that struck down sperate but 'equal' (ie unequal of course) de jure racist segregation

 

http://dagblog.com/thomas-sowell-retired-bye-felicia-21579

I know Black Conservatives who've used Thomas Sowell’s work to ground much of their economic and political philosophies. I can’t and won’t deny his impact on some of my contemporaries. He is an iconic conservative thinker and writer, but I part ways with him when it comes to his commitment to the Black community. Thomas Sowell has always chosen white conservative acceptance over justice for Black people. I know Black conservative writers who will never make it big because they choose their people over their politics.

The cardinal sin for a Black conservative is defending Black people from truncated racist tropes. To make it big as a Black person in the conservative media one must deny the racism that exists in too many Human Resources departments, you must defend the police in instances of police brutality (no matter how egregious their behavior), and when in doubt: blame problems in the Black community on the destruction of Black family or Black on Black crime. There are a number of industries where being on that, “Black sh*t” doesn't fly, but I haven’t seen any industry as intolerant of pro-black rhetoric as the conservative media. I can’t think of one prominent Black conservative with a national platform who has routinely called out racism. You can't advance in that system by challenging the conservative media's position on issues related to the Black community.

Putting a Black face on white supremacist ideology and rhetoric is a tactic rooted in slavery. Contrary to the profit centered "race hustling" myth perpetuated by conservatives, the overwhelming majority of Black activists I've come in contact with haven't benefitted monetarily from supporting the Black community. Most have been blackballed at one point or another from predominantly white institutions because of their outspoken support for Black people. Dr. Michael Parenti once said, "a  journalists who writes for any publication can feel free to write what they want, as long as what they write pleases their editor's wishes." This holds true for Blacks on conservative platforms; even some liberal platforms have a threshold for excessive Black content. Black conservatives talk about freedom, but many aren't free to speak out against systems of white supremacy if they wanted to. A majority of conservatives avoid subject matter that challenges their view of America.

I will remember Thomas Sowell as a man who denied the plight of Black men in America when he wasn't too busy ignoring it. He was, after all, one of George Zimmerman’s most prominent Black defenders. I did a quick Google search to see if he's defended any Black Person in any of the high-profile cases of police brutality over the last few years: I couldn’t find one example of him doing so. Dr. Sowell’s retirement isn’t anything for the Black community to celebrate or mourn. He never used his intellect or platform for our benefit. He leaves and opens a space for a new Black face to rise up the conservative media ladder. 

Almost 25 years ago, Dr. Sowell gave a full-throated defense of the L.A.P.D. officers who nearly beat Rodney King to death. In the last few years Black conservatives have been on television and radio defending the N.Y.P.D. officer who choked Eric Garner to death, blaming Freddie Gray for his severed spine, and defending Michael Slager’s character to the detriment of Walter Scott’s life. There will always be a seat at the table for anyone promoting or normalizing anti-Black sentiments (see Tomi Lahren). If Black conservatives ever want to ditch the label of “Uncle Tom” or “Coon” it would behoove them to start supporting Black people in public. I’ve never heard a Black person call someone a sellout because they believed in supply side economics, but I have seen people disown public figures for their silence. When Black conservatives learn they can’t ignore the plight of Black people and build a legacy with us at the same time they might be able to come home, but until then: Bye Felicia!

 

THAT is white power and white fragility in a nutshell

only one thing wrong

that IS AN ACTUAL SOWELL QUOTE, TURNING IT ON ITS HEAD AND ATTACKING US BAME FOLK!!!

 

 

you need to back the fuck off the whitesplaining attempts to me, as it will never end well for you

I am NOT some 'roll over and show my belly' bish

 

what is next? you going to post a virtual shrine for that sell out handkerchief-head for the white wing/right wing, Clarence Thomas and his traitorous  white nationalist whore of a wife?

 

Clarence Thomas’ Wife Gleefully Cheered On White Supremacists At The Capitol

https://newsone.com/4074553/ginni-thomas-supports-violent-extremists-who-stormed-the-capitol/

Reckonings continue inside the Beltway as public figures continue to be exposed for their blatant complicity regarding the violent mob who attacked Capitol Hill on Wednesday.

The latest is that of Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who on Jan. 6 posted two disparaging posts on Facebook aligning with the baseless claims to overturn the outcome of the election, while sending support to the majority white, violent mob that attacked the Capitol.

 

 

 

[Fulham Broadway 17,333]

There are now a record 171 billionaires in UK, with their wealth rising 21.7% during the pandemic to £597.2bn. 

In the US twenty million Americans lost their job since the start of pandemic.  In the same time,  650 billionaires in America saw their net worth increase by more than $1 trillion . . . and they’re now worth more than $4 trillion.

 

[Atomiswave 6,118]

1 hour ago, Fulham Broadway said:

There are now a record 171 billionaires in UK, with their wealth rising 21.7% during the pandemic to £597.2bn. 

In the US twenty million Americans lost their job since the start of pandemic.  In the same time,  650 billionaires in America saw their net worth increase by more than $1 trillion . . . and they’re now worth more than $4 trillion.

 

You can only laugh really

[Vesper 30,224]

Priti Patel, the rest of the BoJo Bozo Tories, and Brexit in one pic

and yes, I know it is a photoshop job, but sums it all up perfectly

Edited May 21, 2021 by Vesper

[Vesper 30,224]

Sweet Christ, Now Republicans Are Defending The Three-Fifths Compromise

https://www.wonkette.com/sweet-christ-now-republicans-are-defending-the-three-fifths-compromise

Republicans are continuing their public service where they demonstrate why we need critical race theory and The 1619 Project while promoting bills that would ban critical race theory and cancel the year “1619." It's like one of those PSAs at the end of a "G.I. Joe" episode: Don't tell some creepy stranger on the phone that you're home alone, and don't defend the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Today, Tennessee Rep. Justin Lafferty, who was born in 1971, ranted on the state House floor about how awesome the Three-Fifths Compromise was. This reportedly led to members of the Black caucus huddling in groups, perhaps to collectively wonder what the fuck's wrong with the guy. I mean, they knew Lafferty was white, but this was just nuts.

LAFFERTY: The Three-Fifths Compromise was a direct effort to ensure that Southern states never got the population necessary to continue the practice of slavery everywhere else in the country.

Ooh-kay. After the American Revolution, the enslaved population exploded in the South, growing from around 650,000 to 3.9 million in 1860. The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 doubled the size of the United States but also expanded American slavery into the West. If the point of the Three-Fifths Compromise was to stop slavery eventually, which it wasn't, then it failed miserably. Americans literally fought a four-years long bloody war over the issue.

But this ahistorical gibberish is apparently a trend among conservatives in the age of MAGA. Last month, during a debate on a civics-education bill, Colorado Republican state Rep. Ron Hanks also claimed that the Three-Fifths Compromise got a bad rap.

"The Three-Fifths compromise, of course, was an effort by non-slave states … to try and reduce the amount of representation that the slave states had," Hanks said. "It was not impugning anybody's humanity."

Legally quantifying a human being as less than a full person is "impugning their humanity." That's how fractions work. Impugning is almost too nice a word for it. Impugning sounds like you suggested Black people didn't promptly RSVP to their enslavement.

Slavery posed a moral conundrum for the United States during its founding. This new nation was supposedly the land of the free, but there were all these people who weren't free. It's a little off-brand, so the solution was to dehumanize the enslaved population. Last week, a viral clip circulated from Chelsea Handler's 2016 series, Chelsea Does, in which a Confederate apologist compared enslaved people to farm equipment.

RACIST: People were taken care of. Would you take a tractor that you just bought brand new and tear it up, misuse it? No, you're going to take care of it, 'cause you just spent a pile of money on that. Those people produced their crops, worked their fields, so you're not gonna mistreat something like that.

If you grew up in the South, as I did, you heard this explanation often, literally in a history class whenever slavery was discussed. Gone With The Wind was a documentary to these people.

However, a tractor isn't a person, not even on the most materialistic level. This was a problem for Southern states whose “tractor" population was out-pacing their lazy white people population. By the Civil War, enslaved people accounted for more than 40 percent of the population in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana. And they were a clear majority in Mississippi and South Carolina. Fortunately, they couldn't vote! (By the way, these statistics certainly explain white America's gun obsession.)

Lafferty and Hanks are not alone in arguing that the Compromise was a good thing because it limited the slave-holding states' political power, but like most compromises with the South, this only worked in their favor. It's also not like Black people received three-fifths of a vote. We barely have that now.

During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, delegates from so-called “free" and slave-holding states debated over how to determine population for the purpose of legislative representation.

Having failed to secure the abolishment of slavery, some delegates from the Northern states sought to make representation dependent on the size of a state's free population. Southern delegates, on the other hand, threatened to abandon the convention if enslaved individuals were not counted. Eventually, the framers agreed on a compromise that called for representation in the House of Representatives to be apportioned on the basis of a state's free population plus three-fifths of its enslaved population. This agreement came to be known as the three-fifths compromise.

The former White House squatter's lost cause BS, the 1776 Project, rationalized this compromise and the perpetuation of slavery in general as necessary to ensure the union. The South would've bolted, likely preferring to remain under British rule so long as they still had enslaved humans preparing their tea and crumpets. Seriously, these people were fucking shiftless. But, and I know this is asking a lot, if you could look at this from enslaved people's perspective, why should they give a damn if the American experiment endures if they'll live and die in bondage regardless? Slavery was abolished in British colonies in 1833 and 1794 in France, before that asshole Napoleon reinstated the “trade," but it was abolished there completely by 1848. All these dates are earlier than 1863. I appreciate the romance languages so would have no problem speaking French today if it meant ending slavery sooner.

Millions of humans died in bondage after the Three-Fifths Compromise. Even if the intent was to kick the issue down the road, so a future generation of white people could figure out how to make their own beds, the United States is morally accountable for those ruined lives. Deciding not to “own" other humans isn't a complex, difficult issue requiring fancy “compromises." That's only the case if you're bereft of humanity yourself.