AfricanBlue 104 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 I'm glad John is contesting it at least, FA were probably hoping he would just bend over and take it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. 2,742 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 so what hes got a ban money fine?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beirut_Blues 306 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 "try to kick me while im down i break your leg" - John Terry, always climb to the top! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HNKS 508 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 Shows the FA's incompetence again. The FA knows better than the courts. Fucking pathetic. Screw you FA and your daft rules, faggots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted July 27, 2012 Share Posted July 27, 2012 I have to say I saw this coming. But surely they're have to charge Anton as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fhaarkas 39 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 What a sham. JT should just quit the England squad but we all know that's one thing he won't do. Shame on you, FA. Goddamnit do I feel like spitting at someone's face right now. *explodes* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 He'll be unfortunately found guilty. JT has done himself no favours. He is a hated man which will mean public pressure on the FA to find him guility. He has little to no chance. It truly is a witch hunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naked Mole Rat 437 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 I think the FA are charging Terry reluctantly but don't want to lose face if they did not charge him and to avoid angry back clashers and for numerous reasons questions will be raised and compared to Suarez if he was not charged. Disappointed but expected it tbhNo, they're definitely not doing it out of reluctance. They clearly WANT to please the majority, and they don't care how they do it. That was why they prematurely robbed JT of his armband and rebuffed Capello's request to restore it even though that would have put them in a hell of trouble just months before Euro. And there was absolutely uncalled for, too. Everyone would have understood if the FA took its time and reserved any comment or action regarding the matter until the court proved JT guilty or innocent. They just wanted to say, "Look at us! We're giving him shit. We deserve a pat on the back and a jar of cookies, no?" They sort of have put themselves in a hole, but even if they hadn't stripped his armband away in the first place, they still would have charged him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uzairblue 22 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 When will fa leave JT alone :| JOHN TERRY DENIES FA CHARGE ! http://www.footballhighlight.net/?p=35695 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 8 games, then?We need to buy a new centre back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 8 games, then?We need to buy a new centre back.Na get in at Branna at CB and sign Azpilicueta/Maicon/Pizsceck/Debuchy for RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 8 games, then?We need to buy a new centre back.Didn't Suarez get 8 games? I think JT will get 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 No, they're definitely not doing it out of reluctance. They clearly WANT to please the majority, and they don't care how they do it. That was why they prematurely robbed JT of his armband and rebuffed Capello's request to restore it even though that would have put them in a hell of trouble just months before Euro. And there was absolutely uncalled for, too. Everyone would have understood if the FA took its time and reserved any comment or action regarding the matter until the court proved JT guilty or innocent. They just wanted to say, "Look at us! We're giving him shit. We deserve a pat on the back and a jar of cookies, no?" They sort of have put themselves in a hole, but even if they hadn't stripped his armband away in the first place, they still would have charged him.Yes, I agree with you. This could be damaging if he is given a hefty ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Bleacher Report is such bullshit. Talking about the 2008 penalty miss:Terry apologized to the Chelsea fans afterwards. Some fans forgave him, but some of the fans still have a hard time getting over it. Who could blame them?Forgiving him and getting over it are two different things. I will most likely never get over John Terry's miss, but I have completely "forgiven" him. It was hard to be upset at him in the first place, imo. It was just shit luck; had it not been raining that night, we would have been champions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 IF the FA don't charge Terry, it will only make them look more like a fool given that they stripped his captaincy and Capello leaving because of it. They will surely give him a ban to protect their face and as someone said, to please the public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Na get in at Branna at CB and sign Azpilicueta/Maicon/Pizsceck/Debuchy for RB.Can still possibly use Hutchinson too anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutcho 8,443 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 The FA should just get on with it... We all know they are spineless idiots now, so say the charge, JT can appeal, they can deny and we will have a 8 game ban or something stupid... Absoulutely ridiculous, but i don't know why i was hoping for something else as the FA, but they seem to be the PC brigade, dragging this out, is annoying for us and makes them look like even bigger idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,886 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Can still possibly use Hutchinson too anyway.True but I don't think hes anywhere near good enough to be second choice at a team like Chelsea. Maybe play against championship/relegation candidates occasionally but if he was to play against a Fulham, Sunderland or Everton, he would have to have Ramires on the right wing in front of him, dropping back to help him out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 Found not guilty in court, not enough for the FA, they think they are above the law? Ridiculous. If JT is charged so should Anton, they both used offensive language, they've both brought the game into disrepute. So how longs he going to be banned for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted July 28, 2012 Share Posted July 28, 2012 The FA is acting like a pubescent youth... tragicomedy at its best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.