Gary Cahill

[Phil Driver 503]

Match facts:

Cahill failed to make a tackled over 90 minutes against Stoke.

That's no surprise really, how can one tackle whilst running backwards & ball watching?

According to whoscored he made one.

John Terry also made one, but no interceptions to Gary Cahill's one.

John Obi Mikel also made just one (obviously wasn't on Steven Ireland).

Ivanovic made no tackles.

http://www.whoscored.com/Matches/720297/LiveStatistics/England-Premier-League-2013-2014-Stoke-Chelsea

[didierforever 7,349]

Match facts:

Cahill failed to make a tackled over 90 minutes against Stoke.

That's no surprise really, how can one tackle whilst running backwards & ball watching?

still waiting for your reply to TOPTB...

[ChelseasMessiah 304]

Because being wrong by 1 makes whole lot of difference. Cahill is and always will be midtable fodder. There's a reason why our defence has been a complete cluster-fuck in the last few months.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Because being wrong by 1 makes whole lot of difference.

I was actually putting his performance into context. Your problem is that you don't seem to have a clue what you're upset about. You moan about the same shit all the time and the amazing thing is that even with such a small number of subjects that you actually post about (Lampard is shit, Cahill is shit, Lampard is shit, Cahill is shit) you still manage to get your 'facts' wrong.

You are the Tancredo Palmeri of this forum....except you're not even as accurate as him.

[ChelseasMessiah 304]

No, Lampard is past it - and should never be fielded as a DM/CM - and Cahill never had it. It's as simple as that. Frank should be playing 20 minute cameos behind the striker in a 4-3-3 and not 3 fucking games a week whilst Gary should, and no doubt will, be shipped out in the summer.

My points may be harsh, but they are nonetheless true.

[The only place to be 11,313]

No, Lampard is past it - and should never be fielded as a DM/CM - and Cahill never had it. It's as simple as that. Frank should be playing 20 minute cameos behind the striker in a 4-3-3 and not 3 fucking games a week whilst Gary should, and no doubt will, be shipped out in the summer.

My points may be harsh, but they are nonetheless true.

Your points are dull, repetitive, lack incisiveness and frequently incorrect. It's why no one likes them. You literally say two things over and over again in the most dull ways imaginable. You are the very definition of a troll.

And the worst thing is that you lack the balls, the cojones, the class to even admit when either one of them has a good game. That's what sets you apart from everyone else here. You are the worst type of football supporter.

[ChelseasMessiah 304]

Your points are dull, repetitive, lack incisiveness and frequently incorrect. It's why no one likes them. You literally say two things over and over again in the most dull ways imaginable. You are the very definition of a troll.

And the worst thing is that you lack the balls, the cojones, the class to even admit when either one of them has a good game. That's what sets you apart from everyone else here. You are the worst type of football supporter.

Well, nothing changes the fact you deep down know Lampard is indeed past it and should be nowhere near our first 11, especially in the pivot, and Cahill is not good enough. You're just not honest enough to admit it.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Well, nothing changes the fact you deep down know Lampard is indeed past it and should be nowhere near our first 11, especially in the pivot, and Cahill is not good enough. You're just not honest enough to admit it.

I'm honest. The way you see Cahill is the way everyone else sees you.

Enjoy your pint

[Stats 7,135]

No, Lampard is past it - and should never be fielded as a DM/CM - and Cahill never had it. It's as simple as that. Frank should be playing 20 minute cameos behind the striker in a 4-3-3 and not 3 fucking games a week whilst Gary should, and no doubt will, be shipped out in the summer.

My points may be harsh, but they are nonetheless true.

No. I am sure he will stay. He is not the best CB in the world but I don't get the hate towards him. He is a very decent rotation/back-up player to have and I think the criticism you give him is way too harsh. More times than not since he has joined us he has been quite solid although I accept he has his lapses of concentration and bad games but no way as bad as you make him out to be. I rate him and I would be shocked if we let him go which I am sure will not happen.

[ChelseasMessiah 304]

No. I am sure he will stay. He is not the best CB in the world but I don't get the hate towards him. He is a very decent rotation/back-up player to have and I think the criticism you give him is way too harsh. More times than not since he has joined us he has been quite solid although I accept he has his lapses of concentration and bad games but no way as bad as you make him out to be. I rate him and I would be shocked if we let him go which I am sure will not happen.

That would make sense if we weren't looking to bring CBs in. We've been linked with a fair few. both as squad players and first teamers. I think he's gone in June, even if Luiz goes as well.

[Joe Cool 388]

Fucking horrible, this tosspot. He should be nowhere near this side on the back of such shambolic displays this season.

[ChelseasMessiah 304]

I bet Cahill is scared of his own shadow. He's a mediocre player who once in every 15 games comes up with a decent clearance. Other than that he enjoys backing away from strikers and passing the buck.