Frank Lampard

[tiby2979 175]

Maybe Lampard did all this, because we released him without ceremonial. I almost forgot when and how his last game actually is.

Eventually would have had its ceremonial. He just wants to help City to defeat us for to make Chelsea and Jose it look in ridiculous and feed his ego.

Do not know if this was already posted, but it's embarrassing.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/3dbe4e87ba204117b4f316cf8d9b1078/lampard-ny-deal-creates-credibility-issue-mls-new-team

[manpe 10,861]

Has anybody actually asked Pellegrini or the higher-ups for comments about this deal?

[SouthKorea 38]

But ultimately they didn't leave and the only one that left so far (Drogba) didn't leave to join a rival and Gerrard who's leaving at the end of the season as made it crystal clear that he's moving abroad as he considers the thought of joining a rival an abomination (paraphrased). Your point is mute tbh

Don't think you understand the point.

Gerrard is a liverpool kid and Totti was a Roma kid. Lampard was not a chelsea kid.

Lampard was known to be a constant professional, which he is doing by playing with his "loaned" team to his best. Did you think he was going to sabotage city because he use to play for Chelsea?

Like I said before, fans think that players think like them, when in reality, they have other factors to consider more relevant to them.

[Term-X 7,891]

Don't think you understand the point.

Gerrard is a liverpool kid and Totti was a Roma kid. Lampard was not a chelsea kid.

Lampard was known to be a constant professional, which he is doing by playing with his "loaned" team to his best. Did you think he was going to sabotage city because he use to play for Chelsea?

Like I said before, fans think that players think like them, when in reality, they have other factors to consider more relevant to them.

He's as good as a Chelsea kid, he was certainly adopted.. and embraced it 'himself'. I created a post before in this thread explaining how 'Lampard' acted and not the fans, clearly you have trouble absorbing information or just selectively respond to other posts in a tactful way.

[kellzfresh 7,229]

http://nycfcforums.com/index.php?threads/whats-worse-kit-or-lampard.1804/

The poor nyfc fans

[the wes 7,212]

Frank Lampard has no agreement with NYCFC, according to the Premier League

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/8/7514099/chelsea-fc-manchester-city-new-york-city-football-club-frank-lampard-third-party-ownership-fa

[We Hate Scouse 10,286]

http://nycfcforums.com/index.php?threads/whats-worse-kit-or-lampard.1804/

The poor nyfc fans

When I read their posts I find myself doing so in an American accent. Weird.

[zolayes 14,489]

http://nycfcforums.com/index.php?threads/whats-worse-kit-or-lampard.1804/

The poor nyfc fans

they deserve our sympathy ,,

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Frank Lampard has no agreement with NYCFC, according to the Premier League

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/8/7514099/chelsea-fc-manchester-city-new-york-city-football-club-frank-lampard-third-party-ownership-fa

Can we now stop pretending that there is some magical reason why he wasn't blatantly lying and scamming hundreds of fans?

[samzilla 517]

Frank Lampard has no agreement with NYCFC, according to the Premier League

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/8/7514099/chelsea-fc-manchester-city-new-york-city-football-club-frank-lampard-third-party-ownership-fa

The interesting thing about that article is it makes the case that lampard is under third-party ownership, which isn't allowed by the FA. But so long as City keeps on backing up the brinks truck, I guess they can break whatever rules they want.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Can we now stop pretending that there is some magical reason why he wasn't blatantly lying and scamming hundreds of fans?

Yep, he's played us for fools quite magnificently.

[OhForAGreavsie 5,890]

There are no loan fees,mbecause there is no loan. He never signed for NYFC and in all likelihood he never will. He, as a free agent, signed a short term contract with City till December 31st with a clause to extend the deal till the end of June if he proves valuable for them.

He is completely a Manchester City player.

I apologise for my earlier comment in which I described this post as 'nonsense'. Choulo was right and I was wrong.

[sutro 1,026]

so if i get this right city could be in trouble?

Soo it was frank's plan to get city punished all along lol

[Daniel1980 1,425]

so if i get this right city could be in trouble?

Soo it was frank's plan to get city punished all along lol

Riight. I think it's pretty clear where Frank's loyalties lie.

[sutro 1,026]

Riight. I think it's pretty clear where Frank's loyalties lie.

Relax i wasnt serious at all, the stuff he did was very low and an action of no respect for chelsea and nyc fans.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Frank is a wanker, I'm officially done with him and my focus now shifts to the players who are fighting for the club.

[LAM09 6,744]

The plot thickens!

[Dy-lan 142]

So this was all fake ?? Then wtf was this?.....