Romelu Lukaku

[Blue-in-me-Veins 4,067]

Go home Chelsea, your Drunk. 

[Unionjack 7,531]

34 minutes ago, calculatingInfinity said:

Absolutely hate his attitude and work rate. 

While Everton has problems with their defense for a lot of reasons, his complete unwillingness to work for the team should also not be underestimated as a factor. Always complaining and bitching, never showing any winning attitude by working hard and putting on pressure. He's the perfect representation of the Belgian national team. A lot of skills, but not the head on right. We already got Hazard to walk around being a lazy belgian.

Stay away.

 

 

I'm not being nasty but dont you think that could be said about the majority of Belgian payers?

They all walk round with races like a slapped arse. I very rarely see them laugh and when they do it looks awkward. And only once have I seen Eden celebrate a goal by kissing the badge.

Now I know none of this means anything as long as they do their job well and hopefully get on well with their team mates.

Ive only been to Belgium for football matches and gigs and admit I dont know any Belians personaly so Id love to know if this is the same for all the nation or just footballers?

[Blue Armour 4,312]

Not too thrilled about this especially since we've got Michy Batshuayi.

If Lukaku is going to come in for that kind of fee he's bound to start, and he would probably throw a fuss if he doesn't.

And honestly don't want him to relegate Michy to third choice.

Already know a lot about Lukaku's game from the last two seasons and the Euro's. His consistency is nothing to shout about

[Special Juan 27,439]

Liverpool agree a fee of 25M for Geordie Wjynaldum or whatever his name is.....Another fucking bonkers transfer fee.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

People hate Lukaku for doing the same things better than Costa but Lukaku is not good and Costa is "world class" 

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

People hate Lukaku for doing the same things better than Costa but Lukaku is not good and Costa is "world class" 

What thing?

[Chelsea4 1,521]

4 minutes ago, Ryan Fong said:

What thing?

Lukakau is 23 years old and is already better than Costa.Both are not tehnically great even though Lukaku is better than Costa in that aspect,both are strong and Lukaku is more clinical as well.Basically Lukaku is 23 years old and can only get better.

[Costa19 858]

We will probably buy Lukaku for €60M+ and watch that money go straight to Koulibaly. We really need a CB. 

 

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Lukakau is 23 years old and is already better than Costa.Both are not tehnically great even though Lukaku is better than Costa in that aspect and Lukaku is more clinical as well.Basically Lukaku is 23 years old and can only get better.

In what world Lukaku is better than Costa?! Oh my god, we're clearly watching different football mate. But, each to their owns so I respect that, however I believe you're probably the ONLY one person thinks that way in this forum.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Just now, Ryan Fong said:

In what world Lukaku is better than Costa?! Oh my god, we're clearly watching different football mate. But, each to their owns so I respect that, however I believe you're probably the ONLY one person thinks that way in this forum.

Tell me one thing Costa does better than Lukaku?

[Ryan Fong 2,776]

Tell me one thing Costa does better than Lukaku?

Wow you're serious, I thought you were joking.

Look mate, I'm not going to discuss the detail about who is better with you because I know I can't convince you and certainly you can't convince me neither.

Just ask around in this forum, I bet the number of people thinks Lukaku is better than Costa will be less than 5. So either we're all fools and you hold the truth or you are completely clueless about football.

Again, I respect your opinion and let's stop this discussion because I think it's way ridiculous to me.

[Chelsea4 1,521]

Just now, Ryan Fong said:

Wow you're serious, I thought you were joking.

Look mate, I'm not going to discuss the detail about who is better with you because I know I can't convince you and certainly you can't convince me neither.

Just ask around in this forum, I bet the number of people thinks Lukaku is better than Costa will be less than 5. So either we're all fools and you hold the truth or you are completely clueless about football.

Again, I respect your opinion and let's stop this discussion because I think it's way ridiculous to me.

Come on,tell me one thing Costa does better than Lukaku?

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

53 minutes ago, Chelsea4 said:

Come on,tell me one thing Costa does better than Lukaku?

Not being a prima donna?
Not disappearing against any half decent opponent?
His world class movements?
Leads the line expertly? You might not see it but his "antics" often reinvigorate the whole team.
Not being a pampered child who won't fight for his place?
Wouldn't want him in my team for 20 mil, let alone 60.

[Rapkun 668]

Either Michy/Costa paired with Lukaku would be a bad combo. Both of them are poachers with little creativity. We need the other striker to offer more than just goals in his game which is why Morata made a lot of sense. This potential deal not so much..

[Peace. 4,352]

We have already a team full of players that are not good enough with the basics (pass, first touch, etc.). We do not need to buy more of those players — we need to get rid of them.

Then you have his attitude ; his behavior is questionable both on and off the field. Not only he is a primadonna with a loud mouth and creates a toxic atmosphere (on and off the field), but he also does not invest himself well enough during games.

We should stay clear of him.

[petre.ispirescu 4,928]

19 minutes ago, Peace. said:

We have already a team full of players that are not good enough with the basics (pass, first touch, etc.). We do not need to buy more of those players — we need to get rid of them.

Then you have his attitude ; his behavior is questionable both on and off the field. Not only he is a primadonna with a loud mouth and creates a toxic atmosphere (on and off the field), but he also does not invest himself well enough during games.

We should stay clear of him.

Maybe you could enlighten me, but I am wondering -why aren't Chelsea interested in Lacazette? As a matter of fact, why aren't more top clubs interested in him?! Is it OL's asking price? Is there something wrong with the player? His attitude? His commitment to the game? Because for me he is a wonderful striker, a modern predator, worth every penny.

Deschamps' decision to keep him out of the Euros squad left me baffled to be fair, for me he is head and shoulders above Giroud and Gignac. Is there anything about him that could keep managers/clubs from looking at him as a potential signing?

 

[johnnythefirst 1,076]

9 hours ago, Unionjack said:

 

Ive only been to Belgium for football matches and gigs and admit I dont know any Belians personaly so Id love to know if this is the same for all the nation or just footballers?

Change 'Belgians' into for example 'black people' and read your sentence again. ;-)

[Unionjack 7,531]

13 minutes ago, johnnythefirst said:

Change 'Belgians' into for example 'black people' and read your sentence again. ;-)

Dont be ridiculous.

I helped chase the fuckin fascists out of the Bridge dishing out their Nazi propaganda shit.

It cant be helped that some countries are commonly known to have different/stronger characteristichs than others. Like the Germans lacking a sense of humour, Americans are said to be loud and obnoctious with a strong sense of self belief, Brits are supposedly binge drinking hooligans or umberella carrying toffs with a stiff upper lip.

I ask are all Belgians lacking a sense of humour and find it difficult to show emotions.