ParNolio7 285 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 How about Kevin De Bruyne people?!9.9 rating (whoscored.com)created the most chances (10) a single player has EVER created in a WC gamegoal and assistAlways said he'd prove Mourinho wrong, just didn't think he'd do it with such a bloody passion! I'll keep on repeating it: neglecting KDB and letting him go is the biggest disgrace in Mourinho's career, not only talking about his Chelsea term. Blue-in-me-Veins 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluelsthecolour 61 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 How about Kevin De Bruyne people?!9.9 rating (whoscored.com)created the most chances (10) a single player has EVER created in a WC gamegoal and assistAlways said he'd prove Mourinho wrong, just didn't think he'd do it with such a bloody passion! I'll keep on repeating it: neglecting KDB and letting him go is the biggest disgrace in Mourinho's career, not only talking about his Chelsea term.Yep big misstake to let him go. He is, in my opinion, better than Oscar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 How about Kevin De Bruyne people?!9.9 rating (whoscored.com)created the most chances (10) a single player has EVER created in a WC gamegoal and assistAlways said he'd prove Mourinho wrong, just didn't think he'd do it with such a bloody passion! I'll keep on repeating it: neglecting KDB and letting him go is the biggest disgrace in Mourinho's career, not only talking about his Chelsea term.Question is, did letting KDB go allowed Hazard to shine last season as much as he did? Also, no belgium do not press at all, so selling KDB is fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Tomo 21,751 Posted July 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 2, 2014 How about Kevin De Bruyne people?!9.9 rating (whoscored.com)created the most chances (10) a single player has EVER created in a WC gamegoal and assistAlways said he'd prove Mourinho wrong, just didn't think he'd do it with such a bloody passion! I'll keep on repeating it: neglecting KDB and letting him go is the biggest disgrace in Mourinho's career, not only talking about his Chelsea term.Rob Green statistically has the best game for a PL keeper in history (Arsenal vs West Ham in 2007). Sorry Thiabut we have found a better option.Further more I don't care what he does for Belgium in yhr six months he was with us our other AMs were better than him, and don't give me he only played in the carling cup, so did Azpilucueta initially but he TOOK ADVANTAGE of the game time he got. kellzfresh, seanptmiller, Madmax and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsblubot 3,595 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 It's not about who did better. Origi is the better rounded footballer - it's clear to see. He can drop deep and play as CAM, or wing, etc. Not going to be fantastic at that, but he has the ability for it.How good he's going to be in a few years is anyone's guess, but he does have the skills.Lukaku is really a powerful and interesting striker, who can be very effective in certain conditions. He is still 21! And he too will improve with time and games, but his characteristics won't change drastically: Origi will always be the more skillful while Lukaku the more powerful of the two.Belgium are lucky to have such options. Chelsea must not loan out Lukaku out though.... Torres can play with the youth team.Concerning Kevin, reckon it's the same problem Mata had: he can't defend, and despite his attacking ability, Jose values defense/pressing too much. That's how Jose likes to setup his sides, and it is his prerogative as manager. seanptmiller 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coop 114 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 It's not about who did better. Origi is the better rounded footballer - it's clear to see. He can drop deep and play as CAM, or wing, etc. Not going to be fantastic at that, but he has the ability for it.How good he's going to be in a few years is anyone's guess, but he does have the skills.Lukaku is really a powerful and interesting striker, who can be very effective in certain conditions. He is still 21! And he too will improve with time and games, but his characteristics won't change drastically: Origi will always be the more skillful while Lukaku the more powerful of the two.Belgium are lucky to have such options. Chelsea must not loan out Lukaku out though.... Torres can play with the youth team.Concerning Kevin, reckon it's the same problem Mata had: he can't defend, and despite his attacking ability, Jose values defense/pressing too much. That's how Jose likes to setup his sides, and it is his prerogative as manager.And hazard can defend? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsblubot 3,595 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 And hazard can defend?He was able to defend in certain games (tracking the FB), at least reckon Jose is trying to instill that in him.He was particularly poor at defending after coming back from injury though.Ronaldo also cannot defend. Reckon Jose doesn't want too many players on the squad who can't defend. And he considers Hazard superior to Kevin, so he handles Hazard's deficiencies through teamwork/tactics. Hazard is also more aggressive than Kevin, who's got that languid style. Mirallas is also more energetic than Kevin.So, it's down to characteristics.It's really a question for Jose, but that's my take/guess on his reasoning behind which CAM to keep and which to let go. seanptmiller and Coop 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! bababoom 4,478 Posted July 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 2, 2014 How about Kevin De Bruyne people?!9.9 rating (whoscored.com)created the most chances (10) a single player has EVER created in a WC gamegoal and assistAlways said he'd prove Mourinho wrong, just didn't think he'd do it with such a bloody passion! I'll keep on repeating it: neglecting KDB and letting him go is the biggest disgrace in Mourinho's career, not only talking about his Chelsea term.9.9? Fuck me stats, eh?In 90 minutes I thought KDB was very average, especially in the second half. In extra time he played well when moved to the left, but once he scored the Goal (fantastic finish but Lukaku made it) US had to go for it and it meant the whole team had so much space on the counter. Don't really see how he proved Mourinho wrong... has he played outstanding in the WC? not even close. didierforever, Barbara, rantdeville and 4 others 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParNolio7 285 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 haha you know sh!t about football mate. comparing the likes of a humble defender like azpi-already-back-on-the-plain-to-uk-licueta to a world class genius like kevin de bruyne. go enjoy some good defending now! hush hush Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParNolio7 285 Posted July 2, 2014 Share Posted July 2, 2014 2 assists, 1 goal, 2 MOTM appearances. reaching QF's. I'd say KDB is not doing bad, no. how's England doing? c ya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Skipper 20,609 Posted July 2, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 2, 2014 2 assists, 1 goal, 2 MOTM appearances. reaching QF's. I'd say KDB is not doing bad, no. how's England doing? c yaI'll say the same thing and I'm Dutch (we're still in the WC so if that makes my opinion more valid for you then voila). It has nothing to do with England. If you think KDB has been amazing at this World Cup then you're just being biased. KDB is a good player, but shut up with this world class genius stuff like he's been one of the best in the World Cup so far. Barbara, Sovieticus, seanptmiller and 8 others 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 haha you know sh!t about football mate. comparing the likes of a humble defender like azpi-already-back-on-the-plain-to-uk-licueta to a world class genius like kevin de bruyne. go enjoy some good defending now! hush hush2 assists, 1 goal, 2 MOTM appearances. reaching QF's. I'd say KDB is not doing bad, no. how's England doing? c ya The Rising Sun 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 He was able to defend in certain games (tracking the FB), at least reckon Jose is trying to instill that in him.He was particularly poor at defending after coming back from injury though.Ronaldo also cannot defend. Reckon Jose doesn't want too many players on the squad who can't defend. And he considers Hazard superior to Kevin, so he handles Hazard's deficiencies through teamwork/tactics. Hazard is also more aggressive than Kevin, who's got that languid style. Mirallas is also more energetic than Kevin.So, it's down to characteristics.It's really a question for Jose, but that's my take/guess on his reasoning behind which CAM to keep and which to let go.But fabregas is even worse then kdb and mata in defending and he just bought him..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 But fabregas is even worse then kdb and mata in defending and he just bought him.....I'm interested in knowing how you've concluded that...KDB and Mata have been deployed further up the pitch for the majority of their careers, whilst Fabregas has spent a bulk of his playing deeper than both. No way he's worse at defending than Mata or KDB. seanptmiller, Barbara and iseah100 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I'm interested in knowing how you've concluded that...KDB and Mata have been deployed further up the pitch for the majority of their careers, whilst Fabregas has spent a bulk of his playing deeper than both. No way he's worse at defending than Mata or KDB.He was playing in the role of mata at Barcelona. But he also played in many different roles. But he was the best in the position of mata.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 haha you know sh!t about football mate. comparing the likes of a humble defender like azpi-already-back-on-the-plain-to-uk-licueta to a world class genius like kevin de bruyne. go enjoy some good defending now! hush hushHello Brendan Rodgers. iseah100 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 He was playing in the role of mata at Barcelona. But he also played in many different roles. But he was the best in the position of mata....What about his time at Arsenal then, (the best moments in his career by far, much better than what he was at Barcelona) where he pretty much exclusively at CM? Why are you completely ignoring that? He didn't play the position of Mata at Barcelona because they don't even operate with a number 10 due to Messi. You can't have a false 9 and a number 10 in the same system. He played best as a number 8 in Barcelona - i.e. the most advanced midfielder in a 4-3-3 and there's a big difference between a number 8 and a number 10; but then again he also played a lot as the 2nd most advanced midfielder in the 4-3-3 - i.e. Iniesta - Fabregas - Busquets... It honestly isn't that hard to understand why Mourinho purchased him. He's not like Mata or KDB, he gives us something both couldn't - the ability to dictate the game from deep. He wasn't bought to defend or for exceptional work rate. PS: if a mod could move this to the Fabregas thread that would be good because we're very off topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 What about his time at Arsenal then, (the best moments in his career by far, much better than what he was at Barcelona) where he pretty much exclusively at CM? Why are you completely ignoring that? He didn't play the position of Mata at Barcelona because they don't even operate with a number 10 due to Messi. You can't have a false 9 and a number 10 in the same system. He played best as a number 8 in Barcelona - i.e. the most advanced midfielder in a 4-3-3 and there's a big difference between a number 8 and a number 10; but then again he also played a lot as the 2nd most advanced midfielder in the 4-3-3 - i.e. Iniesta - Fabregas - Busquets... It honestly isn't that hard to understand why Mourinho purchased him. He's not like Mata or KDB, he gives us something both couldn't - the ability to dictate the game from deep. He wasn't bought to defend or for exceptional work rate. PS: if a mod could move this to the Fabregas thread that would be good because we're very off topic.But men at arsenal that was some time ago. I don't think it's wise to look that back. At least two seasons back is wise. I mean heck Torres was a monster back many years ago but the past two seasons has been shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! The Skipper 20,609 Posted July 3, 2014 Popular Post! Share Posted July 3, 2014 But men at arsenal that was some time ago. I don't think it's wise to look that back. At least two seasons back is wise. I mean heck Torres was a monster back many years ago but the past two seasons has been shit.Why does everyone always use Torres as a moot point with everything these days? Just like Diego Costa, it's a completely different situation... You seriously can't ignore his Arsenal performances because of what happened to Torres. There are clear reasons why Torres has lost it and that's more due to the fact that his body has basically given up on him. Can you say the same about Fabregas? Has Fabregas been that rubbish at Barcelona? Even if he hasn't been as good as his Arsenal days there are reasons that draw no comparisons with the Torres situation. There's the fact that he isn't the main man there (everything goes through Messi), the fact that he doesn't even fit their system (he's naturally a lot more direct than what Barcelona allow him to do - the system restricts his natural instincts), and the fact that he isn't even the midfield regulator at Barcelona; that's Xavi - I personally think that that's his best role but not in a tiki taka system - in a more direct, faster paced system is where he belongs... Regardless of all of this, he still statistically pulls out great numbers. You bring up the Torres analogy (which is very misguided IMO with all due respects), I'll bring you the Zlatan at Barcelona analogy, the Sneijder and Robben analogy (when they were at Real and weren't being used correctly), the Sanchez analogy (much better at Udinese and for Chile where he plays in a system that fully suits his strengths)... You're worrying way too much. I personally am very confident that he's going to be a great player for us. He's coming back to a more natural environment, he'll play in my opinion in a system that suits more to his strengths...Good times ahead in my opinion. Fernando, DYC., kellzfresh and 3 others 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,585 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Can't blame us for worrying and being a bit skeptical after all we suffer with Torres. [emoji16] The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.