didierforever 7,349 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 nice offside goal.well our strikers cant even do that... oh wait... they cant score open goals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ledg 643 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 I can't see very well from this pic but I think he is the second man and the second man is not offside here. Mong630 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 nice offside goal.It was not offside. Look properly and you will see he was level. Another goal in a big game for him. Keep it up Lukaku. Hope you shut these critics up next season if you are given a proper chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nike 373 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 It was not offside. Look properly and you will see he was level. Another goal in a big game for him. Keep it up Lukaku. Hope you shut these critics up next season if you are given a proper chance.wasn't offside, yet all the commentators and video replays said it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 wasn't offside, yet all the commentators and video replays said it was. please watch again... lukaku was not off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 wasn't offside, yet all the commentators and video replays said it was. Speak what your eyes witnessed and not your ears. The commentators on SS said he was on. He is level. Osman, I think was in an offside position. Lukaku is on mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 so when lukaku scores a good goal, the whimpering and crying here is that he might have been off side... are these guys really chelsea fans??? what the fuck is wrong with our "fans". Atholy and Hamilton 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusek 2,031 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Here's the goal:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6BFL04YcrE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSunshine 672 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 please watch again... lukaku was not off.What's the point of watching a replay when the commentators said it was offside? We must obey. didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 What's the point of watching a replay when the commentators said it was offside? We must obey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nike 373 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Yea his head and chest wasn't offside though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 Good finish yesterday but he was awful in general. oldportblue, yuvala and Styles 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DROGBAtheGOAT 29 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 wasn't offside, yet all the commentators and video replays said it was. Nike you can flat piss of you twat bitch. The lad was onside and you are on here trying to stir up shit. didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 Good finish yesterday but he was awful in general.what? seriously? how? his movement was great. i remember the barkley run where kompany went down. lukaku's positioning was brilllaint and he should have been played the ball. another instance where barkley broke and he took kompany wide making space from him. he won a header and headed it down to coleman who was completely free but his cross/shot was horrendous. his hold up play was brilliant and what was even better were his change of plays passes to baines from those hold up plays.how was his general play awful when he scores a good header, and does all this.???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 So if he doesn't score three he had a bad game? Is that the new standard over here?Imo he had a good game, winning headers, good link-ups, good passing.. Mong630 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 what? seriously? how? his movement was great. i remember the barkley run where kompany went down. lukaku's positioning was brilllaint and he should have been played the ball. another instance where barkley broke and he took kompany wide making space from him. he won a header and headed it down to coleman who was completely free but his cross/shot was horrendous. his hold up play was brilliant and what was even better were his change of plays passes to baines from those hold up plays.how was his general play awful when he scores a good header, and does all this.????So if he doesn't score three he had a bad game? Is that the new standard over here?Imo he had a good game, winning headers, good link-ups, good passing..He scored a good goal, but apart from that he was very ineffective and barely influenced the game, lost the ball 4 times (4 times more than anyone else on the team) in crucial moments and was indecisive and barely threatened City. Sure, he won a few aerial duels against Demichellis, had a few decent passes but he's had far better games than that. If that's the standard you'll hold him up to for having a brilliant game then.A goal glossed over a poor/average performance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 He scored a good goal, but apart from that he was very ineffective and barely influenced the game, lost the ball 4 times (4 times more than anyone else on the team) in crucial moments and was indecisive and barely threatened City. Sure, he won a few aerial duels against Demichellis, had a few decent passes but he's had far better games than that. If that's the standard you'll hold him up to for having a brilliant game then.A goal glossed over a poor/average performance.dont know what match you watched dude. he looked anything but indecisive. he lost the ball 4 times and u are telling me naismith dint lose the ball once? infact i am not even sure what u wrote there. i remember everton players losing the ball in a very very poor position. naismith was HORRENDOUS. he was the one who lost the ball on almost every 3rd touch. even in the "english football thread" that was being said. are u sure u dint confude lukaku and naismith yesterday. cos that the only way i can accept what u have just said.one thing i do agree is he barely influenced the game. but it was not his fault. even if u see where the ball was when the ref blew his whistle u will know what i am talking about. those guys were simply and stupidly passing the ball among themselves, specially baines, naismith rather than putting the ball forward. after he scored the goal, he barely got any service whatsoever. and before that, i think he was pretty good. zolayes 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 dont know what match you watched dude. he looked anything but indecisive. he lost the ball 4 times and u are telling me naismith dint lose the ball once? infact i am not even sure what u wrote there. i remember everton players losing the ball in a very very poor position. naismith was HORRENDOUS. he was the one who lost the ball on almost every 3rd touch. even in the "english football thread" that was being said. are u sure u dint confude lukaku and naismith yesterday. cos that the only way i can accept what u have just said.one thing i do agree is he barely influenced the game. but it was not his fault. even if u see where the ball was when the ref blew his whistle u will know what i am talking about. those guys were simply and stupidly passing the ball among themselves, specially baines, naismith rather than putting the ball forward. after he scored the goal, he barely got any service whatsoever. and before that, i think he was pretty good.So because Naismith was horrendous Lukaku was good? Come on man. We aren't discussing Naismith here, I couldn't care less about him. I still maintain Lukaku's goal glossed over a poor/average performance. If you take away his goal will you honestly tell me he had a good game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 dont know what match you watched dude. he looked anything but indecisive. he lost the ball 4 times and u are telling me naismith dint lose the ball once? infact i am not even sure what u wrote there. i remember everton players losing the ball in a very very poor position. naismith was HORRENDOUS. he was the one who lost the ball on almost every 3rd touch. even in the "english football thread" that was being said. are u sure u dint confude lukaku and naismith yesterday. cos that the only way i can accept what u have just said.one thing i do agree is he barely influenced the game. but it was not his fault. even if u see where the ball was when the ref blew his whistle u will know what i am talking about. those guys were simply and stupidly passing the ball among themselves, specially baines, naismith rather than putting the ball forward. after he scored the goal, he barely got any service whatsoever. and before that, i think he was pretty good.you seemed to have seen the same match that I watched ,,, pity I missed the game others saw mediator and didierforever 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted May 4, 2014 Share Posted May 4, 2014 So because Naismith was horrendous Lukaku was good? Come on man. We aren't discussing Naismith here, I couldn't care less about him. I still maintain Lukaku's goal glossed over a poor/average performance. If you take away his goal will you honestly tell me he had a good game?yes he had a decent performance. i have already said in my first post, why i think so. tell me how many decent chances did everton make? the one where naismith was unable to score 1v1 with joe hart, lukaku's run to pull of a defender wide was good. his goal was good. except for that he dint get any service whatsoever. we are not discussing naismith but a striker cant do much when the player behing him loses the ball every second touch. lukaku did his job yesterday. took on players, brought players into the game, movement was good. i dont know how u r saying it was a poor performance? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.