Term-X

As the most famous member of Talk Chelsea (since BlueLion changed his name to Alex ), I find it odd how these random video creators are calling me "ridiculous" and Henrique a "waste", smh. And yes, Mourinho 'would' have been a traitor, HAD he gone to United.

You call Henrique a "waste", you call me (of all people!) "ridiculous".. Who the fuck are you again?

2013/14 Man-City shirt.. The texture and the collar are the exact same as the new England shirt.. but in light blue.

He initially 'liked' the post, but immediately un-liked it when he saw nono's reaction to it, Lmao. ^ Not the first time he's done that either, for someone who 'supposedly' doesn't care what people think of him, he's pretty self conscious. That's rich.

Seem to be going around in circles in this thread, groundhog day. Already addressed his final season, skip back through the pages. Bitter tears? "every supporter", people were protesting outside the bridge ffs!, clearly you have selective memory. Nobody knows how much control Jose' had over transfers, we had a very naive owner who was new to football club ownership and was 'personal friends' with Shevchenko. Mourinho was denied Waitrose eggs, he probably had more control at Real, especially after Perez was sacking club officials just to keep him happy.

If he signed a 20 year contract with no clauses, fine print or loopholes.... Yes.

"Vex" the Chelsea fans.. which ones? Anyone who backs Luiz over Mourinho needs to re-evaluate life, regardless of the validity of that article. Mourinho is bigger than any player. He could sell Mata, and have my.. and most Chelsea fans 100% backing.

Speaking of which..

1 year ago today I took this image.. and this one..

Well, he certainly won't be inheriting a better squad this time around, bar a few.

I'd imagine prior to re-appointing him, that the board would 'asses' what went wrong, what went right and why it went sour during his previous stint. Devise an improved working relationship, and work out the best way to go forward.

Re-appointing Jose' would certainly suggest so. Roman has different 'advisers' around him now, the Kenyon era is long gone. I think the club actually 'did' see AVB as long term managerial material, he just made it nigh on impossible for them to remain patient with him.

Downhill?, lmao.. hardly, it was still early enough in the season and only a very naive owner with no long term project (which Roman proved himself to be through that saga) would sack a manager of Jose's calibre like he did. Or 'treat' a manager the way he did, i.e.. Grants appointment, certain signings forced upon him etc. Only Chelsea fans with extremely short-term mentalities thought the decision was the right one. That's why everyone was in shock, fans protesting outside the bridge etc, still pining for him ever since. If Jose' returns this summer, all will be forgiven though, in regards to Roman.

Nope. It was a mind bending decision by the board and down to club ownership naivety, that.. and Roman's broken down relationship with Jose'. Which clearly effected things on the pitch (not enough waitrose eggs were purchased). All in all though, you are going to have 'dips in form' at some point in the season, Jose' could have revived the campaign like Grant Steve Clark did. The sacking itself was shocking (worst moment as a football fan, worse than moscow), fans were crying and protesting outside stamford bridge, The JT fall out was fabricated and he himself denies any rift.

True, the boards decision to sack him was so insular, Mourinho was bigger than a 'moment'. You could say the previous seasons accomplishments were the reason for that, however.. Carlo never had that same affinity with the fans, as demonstrated by the lack of uproar. If Jose' had the same season he'd just had at Madrid, 99% of us would still back him.

Arsenal are sponsored by Puma, image invalid.

I posted it 'days' ago in one of the most popular threads at the time, part 4 of the member votes. Bit odd for someone to use something on the same board, so quickly. But.. he found it on reddit so it's all good.. Moving on.

Highlight of the season: Europa league win Frank Lampard becoming our all-time top goal scorer.

nvm.

This is my gif.. I made it, and was the first person to post it on Talk Chelsea.

Nope. Because he acknowledged that he's speaking for this year only, unlike the philistines who voted in the poll.

"We won the league with Gallas, Terry, Lampard and Eidur Gudjohnsen who all played a pivotal role in us winning the league by a long stretch, we were already a fantastic team before Roman arrived. Manchester City bought a shit load of players during the Thaxin Shinawatra era and then they spent a bucket load since Mansour has arrived and they only won it on goal difference. The way we did it and the way Man City did it was totally different, the core of the Chelsea team was always there except Drogba/ Makalele but Eidur played just as many games as Drogba in his first season in the League." - Badboy

I was relaxed about the Mourinho situation, but this has unsettled the waters.. a bit. 'Hopefully' the sheikh owner-connection to Malaga, plus the swift exit before the seasons over, means they've agreed terms with Pellegrini.

That wasn't my point.. The best side in italy were relegated, Milan had points deducted. Mancini won titles because of this, that scandal was the best thing to happen to his career. Even when he 'actually' won the title (as opposed to being 'awarded it') it was still because of this, and the effect it had on the league.