Seriously? Well maybe against your country he "sucked" but when Denmark played England a couple years ago and lost 2-1 he was the best player on the pitch. He dominated the game, had a brilliant left footed strike that hit the post and set up the goal too, he was outstanding for a player his age. He picked up rave reviews. You are judging him by a small minority of games. Look at most of his games he has played and most of it he stands out, regardless of league. Mata was invisible against City and Juve, but does that mean we should say he is a bad player? No, because he is a quality player and no one is super man (bar messi ) You say he was nothing specially against United, however did you watch Ajax vs Man City this season? Ajax won 3-1. He was a step ahead of everyone. Best player from start to finish, and rounded the game off by scoring an excellent goal. If he performed against the English national team and performed against City, how can we say he will be a flop. Oscar is a different player. I do not know who is definitely better out of the two but Eriksen is a better dribbler and passer and his all round game is brilliant and is comfortable on both feet and as he gets older I think he has a future to develop into a future false no.9. I like Oscar a lot but to say he is 20 times better than Eriksen is unfair especially when you have not seen Eriksen in the PL. What Eriksen has shown so far, he looks like he will be an excellent player.