Chelsea Legend 11

Fair enough

Interesting... I for one still believe the Messi thing is as on as it was when this thing broke. Nothing I've heard would lead me to think it is just a bad rumour. Question, your source. Is it unusual for them to close the entire floor and have security around during transfer talk? Also how often is Marina at the grounds? All good if you can't answer.

Is there a page?

We'll see... And I don't care if Messi just lies on the floor until we get the ball back certain players, you know, the types that are generational talent, just have to focus on what they do best which is score and make plays.

I missed this could you please enlighten me on this matter? Or just direct me to the original post

Was never off in my opinion. Messi said what he had to say on Barca TV because they have the whole second half of the season to play for and the speculation of him leaving would've tore the dressing room apart.

Cabella sucks... Give me Willian 99 out of 100

Nothing is guaranteed this year, least of all Arsenal and City. Sanchez can earn them a draw for sure.

Holidays are for the families. Most people work midweek and can't go.

What is our status on the HG situation as far as EPL standards are concerned? Blackman is back but doesn't need to be registered, do we will need a few players in order to get our numbers up? If so, buying Reus now may be a bit of an issue.

Came in here to basically touch on the exact same thing. If Cahill starts he will be picked on again, Gomis was in beast mode that game and probably should've scored 2. Usually I would adopt the old "if it ain't broke don't fix it" stance but that first half at home against a weakened Newcastle scared the shit out of me. Forced change is probably Luis for Azpi since he hurt his groin, Cech should keep his place because in my eyes he was MOTM for his work in the 1st half. Oscar still looks off the pace and should probably be dropped despite having a goal and assist. I'd give Ramires a run out from the start and look to take Sigurdsson out of the game. 4-3-3...

Still not convinced

Maybe they spoke to the club president? lol... Its always gonna be the summer before this actually gets resolved.

Reus represents what we want in Schurrle. Good in possession, scores goals, stretches defenses and good technique... At the price we'd be dumb not to buy him now and sell/loan Salah, keep Schurrle till the summer.

Hard to ignore this guys finishing qualities. We should be looking at this guy...

Sign him up! https://vine.co/v/ODZJXWZQZxr

I thought he was good not drool worthy.

I think a lot of that comes down to amount of times we've been giving the ball away in dangerous counter attacking areas and also the fact that Matic, Oscar and Fab haven't been very good in the high press recently

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city/11338738/Manchester-City-finances-under-scrutiny-from-Uefa.html

Only place this falters is with Silva, he is much more dangerous in the 10 than he is on the wing

The first word is 'likely' in your definition. which is what he's proven he is, likely to be injured... he's 25 and has had a host of ailments dude its not a big deal but it is definitely something to look at and many are. You're over analyzing the word injury prone too. To be honest I don't care if he's injury prone, for the price its worth the risk. Hopefully the numerous ailments he's had will subside. Whether he is or isn't injury prone is very debatable at this point which is also a reason why there is risk. Ankle injuries are very difficult to recover fully from as a footballer too.

Again you're wrong. prone to injury is showing a history of having injuries. If someone gets injured multiple times in a short period of time then the moniker injury prone is adopted to that player whether rightly or wrongly. In Reus' case I think its warranted. http://www.transfermarkt.com/marco-reus/verletzungen/spieler/35207 Its not just the first page there are two pages.

Injury proneby definition is 'being prone to injury' He's had a couple of major injuries in his career it means he is prone to injury. Having said that, for 20M or thereabouts I'd take a stab at him

He's done it a couple times but not enough to suggest this is how he will play going forward

Unless they play two up top like they did for most of their dominant years. Aguero is better playing off the main striker if you ask me.