communicate

There is no 100% guarantee but it is safer simply because he has proven for 2-3 seasons that he can produce in epl. Watching lukaku play, i can be sure that he is going to be good for us the same with costa because the way they play. Morata on the other hand coming from different league plus he is not a physical player, which is imo a requirement to play as a striker in epl where the referee tend to let physical play go more often. Hopefully I am wrong but imo for short term lukaku is the better option but for long term Morata can be the better striker if he developed physically

I wanted us to sign Lukaku not Morata because I like physical striker up top plus he is epl proven so he will score right away. But in long run if Morata can improve physically he will be a world class striker. It is hard to get faster but getting stronger is certainly a feasible goal.

I disagree that when is not scoring he does not contribute. Technically he is very poor, I think everyone agree with you. But his overall game is better than you think, he press opp back line well, he run the channel hard to create space for our winger ( I want michy to do this) and he combine well with Fabregas and hazard in particular, it is just his technical ability that can be very frustrating at times.

1st tactic. Hmm Alonso as lb, with hazard supporting, that is a disaster waiting to happen 2nd tactic, I don't see any different between that and our usual 343

For me money talks, eventually if the money continues to be like this, team from epl will surpass the 3 teams unless epl teams keep making dumb signings. Furthermore, in epl we are competing against two richer teams. United / city will win epl in 1-4 years. Do you realize united could spend crazy money on di maria flop, martial flop and still have the money to sign pogba and Lukaku for crazy money. The same with city, they let their whole fb go and spend 120 m to rebuild it. That is why we are trying to build a new stadium, the same with spurs, and travel to overseas to build brand in order to gain more revenue.

Who are you talking about? Kdb?? Lukaku?? Bertrand?? Those are 3 players that Mourinho did not want and we expected Mou to be here for long term You complain about lack of youth integration/opportunity , hmm do you see the amount of criticism in this forum regarding the signings that we made. They said we need a lot more players but at the same time you want to give youth player a chance. I don't know how you do that. If you want to give youth a chance, then we should not sign bakayoko, then chalobah will definitely stay. Don't sign Rudiger then Ake will stay. Now people say that we need more signings, if we sign a new rwb, tomori will never play, if we sign a new winger boga will never play, a new cm baker will never play.

World domination?? We all know who are the 3 best team sin the world and right now. In terms of quality they are quite a few level above us. Unless Roman turn into his old self there is no way we that is our goal. We should just improve our squad step by step

The fact that we have just sold Matic for 40 m, I think we will make signing simply because now we have excess cash to spend

When is he going to be ready? Hopefully he can take part in the community shield.

Don't like selling to title rival but it make sense financially. We probably set 40 m as the price. Juve only want to pay 20 m. There is no other party willing to go to at that price except united similar to k. Walker transfer. As long as we spend the money for a good player, this can be a brilliant transfer

That was an exception. It is rare for a big club to let their player go during deadline day but maybe they don't consider luiz a crucial part of their plan plus it was a good business for psg. 30 m for 29 years old cb.

It has been very quiet market and our season starts next week. It is difficult to get a really good player at the end of the period. I think adding one really good wb is enough. I don't like too many transfer in one go unless we were really bad the previous season, it will disrupt team chemistry.

I don't get why people keep saying that Chelsea board is incompetent. In the last 13 years, we have won 5 epl titles plus 1 ucl. That is the same as United which is a much bigger club. Our board track record is outstanding

It looks like we are not going to make any signing. A new great wb will complete this transfer window but it looks like our transfer is closed

That is a shame. We definitely need him for next season but if a player want to go,we should let him go at good price

Can he play cm/wb? If not next

United probably

I honestly just want people to judge him until at least he play one full game as a striker.

Do they count community shield ??

I still don't understand why are we selling Matic Does he want to leave like Costa or Conte does not want him anymore ?

Is he better than Kennedy ? If yes, sign him up please

I think they are contender, in fact imo nothing change in term of squad rank compare to last season, they and city have the best squad, the same as last season. Pogba will be even better and Lukaku will score for them, I think they are going to be dangerous I completely agree with your 2nd assessment, last season was a failure for team like United. They won two cup that most big team use it to play their bench/youth player. Yet they were bragging about winning two major trophies.

Just read the previous page (6). Maybe I interpret their conversation wrongly

They said Chelsea Torres not just Torres. If they are comparing him to Pool Torres then I think they are crazier because that Torres was lightning quick

Because we are going to play 343 for the majority of the time, if you want the flexibility to move to 3 man midfield then we should sign a versatile player maybe like chambo but Arsenal will never sell him to us.