manpe

Screw the laws, my question is simple - is a human being capable of taking its life while suffering from no diseases/disorders mental or physical without being pushed or manipulated to do so. Was my question really so vague? Simply put - can a happy healthy person kill him/herself? Like a person thinks "why the hell not" and jumps into a gigantic meat grinder. But I got some good answers, thanks.

Let's put it this way - if the person is completely healthy physically and mentally.

I'm not talking about euthanasia, I'm asking whether a person is capable of committing suicide without actually suffering from anything.

Is it possible for a human to commit voluntary suicide without suffering from depression or any other form of mental disorder?

What good would it do? I don't really care enough, plus I know it would achieve nothing, you're one of the staff. I want to make you realize you were wrong, not to punish you. Tbh I didn't really care about your post until you attacked me, I didn't find it funny or noteworthy in any other way. I wouldn't even have let it drag this far, but your arguments/opinions really bothered me. They are wrong and I very strongly believe that.

But what would you do to someone who told your girl "Oh my eyes. My poor, poor eyes!" in an insulting manner? Would you pat his back? What I said was a boorish compliment, believe it or not, many girls/women feel flattered hearing that. Not sure if they would feel flattered to what you said though. @whatthemata, were you offended by my comment?

No, I am arguing because I think you're wrong. Thanks for showing your true face, need I say more? Oh, by the way, The Skipper is anonymous for me too. I don't know his name, I don't know anything about him, he's a stranger to me who I will never see face to face. How did you even come to the conclusion that I was being rude/insulting anyway? Read further... I spoke to The Skipper afterwards to clear any thick air, because I didn't even entertain the thought that what I said could have been offensive until you came to "rescue". What did he respond? "No worries, no offence taken man, I found it quite funny to be honest haha. I think Choulo was more offended than I was!" You're just being uptight here. What did you consider so offensive anyway? I said he looked like a young Mikel, or unless you consider Mikel ugly, then there is nothing wrong with that. Then I expressed my skepticism whether those pictures were real or not due to the fact that they seemed too "professional" and because the girl was too pretty to be true (again, a compliment more than anything). What I really did was praise them. What you did was downright insulting to two human beings. How you can keep justifying your hypocrisy is beyond me. As a moderator? Do you think by stressing your position you can scare me away? I was never being offensive, all I did was praise people. Even the 'plough' comment was meant to indicate that I find the person good looking, the choice of words was supposed to be humorous and intentionally boorish, but I guess your understanding of humour is limited to having stabs at less fortunate people behind their backs.

What's the difference between best general knowledge and wisest forumer categories?

What kind of society are you talking about? In some parts of the world it is accepted to discriminate or persecute people for whatever reasons that aren't socially accepted, do you accept that? In North Korea if you make fun of your political leaders, you will get severely punished or killed. So are you using a social example that fits your argument while casually neglecting the notion of common decency and moral ethics, basically establishing the "others do it, why can't I?" habit of action. Which, may I add, is a huge reason why the society in general has become this cynical and hypocritical bubble we live in today. FYI in many developed countries such words can be legally interpreted as humiliating, degrading and mental violence, actions for which in many societies a person can be held accountable in a court of law. Come back when you own a comedy show and have all the legal grounds to do so. Meanwhile just accept that your criticism towards me reeked of double standards. EDIT: One more point I would like to make. Look, there is a difference between parodying people and straight up insulting and disrespecting them. The comedy shows you talk about mostly do just that - parody, while remaining respectful. The kind of comedies that simply takes a human being and stamps it to dirt, well, they may sound funny to you until you yourself become a subject of ridicule. Only bitter and miserable scum genuinely enjoy them. Think about it, how would you feel if you found out that there is a whole thread dedicated to you in a forum, where its only purpose is to see how creatively people can mock your appearance. Would you think "well, this fucked up society enjoys it, so I better dig my head into the sand and take it from behind like a proper bitch."?

My comments weren't meant to be offensive, if they were, then I'm sorry. But do you think it's okay to be rude under the protection of anonymity? Do you think if those ladies were to read all those nasty comments, they would weep and laugh out of joy? I don't think so. Anonymous comments do hurt people, especially them, because faceless and nameless people are often the most honest ones. You know what is the most common excuse bullies make? "It was all a joke, we didn't know he/she was hurt by it". Until it was too late that is. That thread is disgusting. Its only purpose is to mock other people.

In a different universe, in a different dimension, another manpe somewhere out there is gay for you.

Maybe, just maybe I am. You're calling me rude while your comment towards two ladies were, and I quote "Oh my eyes. My poor, poor eyes!"

Now you guys, you are just being rude to the two ladies.

Do you think Mikel is good enough for Chelsea?

The guy next to the hot girl looks like a young Mikel and you know it. Though I still don't believe it's him because those pics are too brushed and women like that exist only in pr0n or rap videos. More proof needed, Skipper.

He saw whatthemata's picture in the mugshot thread, seconds after that this thread was born. The paths of a human mind...

Or how about "philistine"? He seems to love that word.

Where on Google did you find those pics? No. The world needs more agricultural people.

would plough

"What's most important to you, your club or English national team" - what a stupid question, Ferguson is Scottish!

Would plough WHY IS THE TROPHY RED?? WHY IS THE STADIUM RED??????

Rafa

My word... I hope they at least take with them the reserve squad, not the tired faces.

Tbf neither of the "controversial" candidates are controversial, it's just they have this reputation. TX, as said, has been inactive and actually sensible and much more mellow for the good part of the past year. Only recently he's made a clown out of himself by desperately trying to reclaim this award, in fact they were so transparent attempts I was quite honestly disappointed. Henrique, on the other hand, genuinely doesn't seem to care. His April fool's thread was genius too, the whole "chaos is the way forward" thing, most people fell for it Whatever he says, I'm 99.9% convinced it was a hoax and it worked. Due to the fact that he never opens topics, but the one time he did it was timed on 1st April and had the most controversial content ever, succinctly ending with the words - "chaos is the way forward" - the most unpopular opinion known to mankind. Even though Rupert and The Madrid One managed to be here only for a short time (due to being banned), they stirred the most controversy during the last year. If they had been allowed to stay, I've no doubt they would be dominating this poll this time. Anyway, I'll give my vote to Henrique simply because the polling system won't allow me to skip one category.

Isn't it possible to skip one category? I tried to vote on two, it didn't let me, but my vote for best graphics designer would be totally random because I don't visit that section of the forum.