It's ironic to me that those who condemn the use of statistics as a reliable and accurate means of objective anaylysis are also the ones who are quick to throw oscar's & goals and 6 assists in a debate. In otherwords, stats is only reliable and useful when it suits their argument. Imo The main and most important stats for a playmaker/AM are key passes, chances created as it's the most relevant benchmark for creativity which is the primary task of an AM. also people always fail to recognize the importance of clinical finishers or lack thereof in a team in relation to assist as it takes two to tango so to speak . An overwhelming majority of the best, most creative passes don't often get converted. if player A creates far more clear cut chances but is surrounded by poor finishers and i.e records comapratively low assist figure and player B creates less clear cut chances but assists more goals due to having superior and more clinical teammates and striker(s), who is the better attacking midfielder of the two? When comparing attacking midfielders, these factors needs to be accounted for. goals and assist is far to simplistic and doesn't necessarily reflect a player's creativity and all round consistency.