didierforever

how is he not chelsea quality??? is he because he got 10 goals last season or is it because he was one of our best players in the europa league... also how is schurlle better than moses already? have u seen him play in the blue shirt? all of us here had hyped marin this way too and see what happened to him...

WHAT???

united squad - valencia, young, nani, kagawa + giggs to play on the wings bayern squad - ribery, robben, shaqiri, muller chelsea squad - hazard, schurlle, moses to play on the wings. how exactly is he surplus??? we need to be competing for PL , fa, coc and atleast hope to reach quarter/semi of CL, and for that we need depth which this guy provides wonderfully. selling him would be a BIG MISTAKE. we were lucky that none of the MAZACAR were injured last season and should go into this season prepared for any catastrophe.

moses to everton rumors are gathering pace... any idea if its true?? if its true then it would probably be the first bad move of the transfer season.

BIG DOUBT - is he released or not??? the official site shows that the no.40 shirt is STILL held by hilario(us)... any comments?

i know and i am definitely not complaining bout cech in anyway. but sometimes even the best can falter. i mean look at JT's last season. god forbid that happens to cech but having some1 like schwarzer as a back up would be great.

how the hell is he still here. if russian clubs can pay 50 mil for hulk or pay 400k/week to etoo, why cant they take this guy for 15mil and pay him 200k/week.

if lopez can challenge cassilas then why cant schwarzer challenge cech... the point of being a back-up/squad option is that the first teamers dont take their place for GRANTED and put in good performances consistently (not that cech does not do that).

thank god... no more of the 10mil for john ruddy bullshit... perfect signing, free and more than capable of challenging cech plus also just a one-year contract.

villa is better than lukaku/ba??? the same villa who was dropped from the spain team for FLOPNANDO FLOPPES... their is a reason why he was sold for 5 mil, its not cheap, its the right price... villa is in the twilight of his career plus add to it his insane wages he would have been nothin but a poor buy if he had joined us...

people here probably do not want a cheating, diving, racist cunt... there are players like rooney/ibra/benteke who can score 20 goals a season without doing any of the things mentioned before.

10 mil for a player who would AT MAX play 15-20 matches... what a joke!!!

no question about this. rooney/zlatan, no gomez. rooney would be so perfect but you just know that its not gonna happen.

unethical, unprofessional, cheating, diving,biting,racist, rat-looking cunt... dont want this piece of shit here... on the other hand if we do buy him, it would mean a lot of gametime for lukaku because suarez is suspended for atleast half the season

its a big risk!!!! you will probably be creating a monster or he ll become some1 like walcott, all potential but no execution due to poor use. on the other hand, the best manager in the world can use lukaku the way he should be used at the moment and we will have our world class player in a season or 2.

he proved himself in the best possible way. but to give him the role of the no.1 striker for chelsea would be suicidal. to throw him into the deep against the big teams in title deciding matches and big matches would not be advisable. i wont blame him if he chokes. no one here is saying that he should be loaned out or relegated to even the 3rd striker role, but directly making him no.1 is far worse and that is the reason our board desperately wants a WC striker.

believe me i am not. if it comes down to it , it would be a very hard decision to make. but losing jose in 2 years would probably be the worst thing to happen to CFC than anything in my opinion. so zlatan just edges it for me.

i get what u r saying about all the squad - psychology and harmony and how zlatan can have an important role to play in messing up the psych of youth, but we also have to understand that despite mou saying about staying here for a "long time" , nothing is still assured. what if we start with torres/ba and and the season trophyless and then mou is fired, that would probably be the single worst thing that could happen ti all our investment in youth because their will be no one to use that talent. again zlatan is a back option in case we dont get cavani/rooney. i for one cant see any other world-class striker coming to chelsea in this transfer window,i.e., if u still consider higuain and villa as world-class.

i know. its needed to get your point across specific type of people...

so u just made our whole team a pack of bad-asses because zlatan came in and had a blow-off. well that seems very highly likely and very tough to argue against. in fact anything with so many "what ifs" and "what then" is hard to argue.... all i know is that zlatan has played for almost every top team in the world - reason he has a short fuse but is a brilliant player. he went to barca and stayed for a year but none of iniesta, messi, pedro etc became hound-dogs like u expect our team to become. the only thing that really sticks and is an EXCEPTIONAL point in your post is - He will be even more dangerous when his flame fades. that is a scary thought, but i would still say, he would be a good option for a year or 2 specially if we dont get cavani/rooney. because starting the season with torres/ba as our main strikers is inviting trouble.

this is nice. when we have not got anything to agrue with lets just say - HAHAH, THIS IS HILARIOUS... get a grip. now we are not allowed to use capital letters??? WHERE HAVE YOU COME FROM... AND WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO because I M GOING TO KEEP USING THEM. again dint insult any1 compared to everything thats said on this forum. if a word like imbecile can get you so emotional, then i cant even imagine what would happen to you on a match-day. ps - seriously dont care what you think. zlatan would be a good buy for us IF we dont get cavani because i cant think of any1 as better as him that would come here (rooney for 25mil is a shit story because united will milk us like hell).

lets open a thread and ask people who would they want to lead chelsea's line-up in a CL final this season. LUKAKU or ZLATAN (assuming these are our only 2 options). i think the result may shock you into recognizing a very simple truth. and please stop putting words into my mouth. never said that the difference between winning and losing a CL final will be lukaku and zlatan but who would YOU want to see start and lead your line. we have 3 strikers but are strongly linked to any and every world class striker available at the moment. is that a suprise?NO. because the 3 we have are simply not GREAT. one of them might go onto become great but at the moment, our need is different. if zlatan's fights are the only reason you can think of that we should not buy him, then i dont give a shit about it. our captain is JT, our legend is DD (who has on tv fought with ballack, said "fucking disgrace", dived, slapped vidic in a CL final, acted like a crybaby when lamps dint let him take a penalty against wigan in 2009-10 which would have won him the golden boot that he ultimately did), and u r worried that zlatan would hamper squad harmony. BULLSHIT. go to your first post where you quoted me. it was my post to bushman that you quoted and called me out on it. if you felt aggreived about "imbecile" then sorry, but at that moment you dint. you acted like a busy-body and you simply should have. so dont give me a lecture on moral ethics. "By the way, please don't use capitals, are not good for my sight and them won't put you over me, never." - i thought this was i public forum and we were allowed to do anything we wished and blah blah blah...

and who said they would fight??? just because something MIGHT happen, u would stop us from buying world class strikers like zlatan? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? we are in the CL final, playing against barca, you actually think benteke/lukaku/damiao/bony would be better than zlatan. and who the hell said rooney is not world class. please go back to the list i wrote before and read it CAREFULLY. also having lukaku+ benteke would be really risky as both are really inexperienced. i have watched benteke's last season and still think he is not needed here. we already have a young beast in lukaku and need a world class striker to give us an edge. i quoted bushman when i used the term "racial insult". so back and check if u want. i dint say anything to u so get off your high horse and again stop acting like such a busy body. that quote was meant for bushman and quoted to bushman and its bare minimum courtesy to not get involved in a dialogue between 2 people. is that CLEAR?

roman sacked mou or roman and mou had a falling out but 6 years later, SUPRISE SUPRISE, moun is BACK. these guys are professionals. they ll deal with it. plus we are talking about a zlatan transfer in the case cavani joins psg. if he does that what options do we have cavani - psg, falcao- monaco, lewa - does not want to come, aguero - very settled, dzeko - city just sold balo and tevez in 6 moths with no replacements, rooney - manu will milk the transfer, rvp - not happening unless 40/50 mil. so world class strikers left would be higuain/villa and that is barely an upgrade from torres/ba. so fight or no fight, attitude/ no attitude, zlatan will be better for us. u can say what u want but stop being a busy body and getting urself involved where u r not wanted. learn your limits and stay within them.

imbecile is an insult? i would say its the magnitude of wrongness (well i would have used some other word but u would have thought that as an insult too) that prompted me to use the word "IMBECILE"...