didierforever

this is nice. when we have not got anything to agrue with lets just say - HAHAH, THIS IS HILARIOUS... get a grip. now we are not allowed to use capital letters??? WHERE HAVE YOU COME FROM... AND WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO because I M GOING TO KEEP USING THEM. again dint insult any1 compared to everything thats said on this forum. if a word like imbecile can get you so emotional, then i cant even imagine what would happen to you on a match-day. ps - seriously dont care what you think. zlatan would be a good buy for us IF we dont get cavani because i cant think of any1 as better as him that would come here (rooney for 25mil is a shit story because united will milk us like hell).

lets open a thread and ask people who would they want to lead chelsea's line-up in a CL final this season. LUKAKU or ZLATAN (assuming these are our only 2 options). i think the result may shock you into recognizing a very simple truth. and please stop putting words into my mouth. never said that the difference between winning and losing a CL final will be lukaku and zlatan but who would YOU want to see start and lead your line. we have 3 strikers but are strongly linked to any and every world class striker available at the moment. is that a suprise?NO. because the 3 we have are simply not GREAT. one of them might go onto become great but at the moment, our need is different. if zlatan's fights are the only reason you can think of that we should not buy him, then i dont give a shit about it. our captain is JT, our legend is DD (who has on tv fought with ballack, said "fucking disgrace", dived, slapped vidic in a CL final, acted like a crybaby when lamps dint let him take a penalty against wigan in 2009-10 which would have won him the golden boot that he ultimately did), and u r worried that zlatan would hamper squad harmony. BULLSHIT. go to your first post where you quoted me. it was my post to bushman that you quoted and called me out on it. if you felt aggreived about "imbecile" then sorry, but at that moment you dint. you acted like a busy-body and you simply should have. so dont give me a lecture on moral ethics. "By the way, please don't use capitals, are not good for my sight and them won't put you over me, never." - i thought this was i public forum and we were allowed to do anything we wished and blah blah blah...

and who said they would fight??? just because something MIGHT happen, u would stop us from buying world class strikers like zlatan? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? we are in the CL final, playing against barca, you actually think benteke/lukaku/damiao/bony would be better than zlatan. and who the hell said rooney is not world class. please go back to the list i wrote before and read it CAREFULLY. also having lukaku+ benteke would be really risky as both are really inexperienced. i have watched benteke's last season and still think he is not needed here. we already have a young beast in lukaku and need a world class striker to give us an edge. i quoted bushman when i used the term "racial insult". so back and check if u want. i dint say anything to u so get off your high horse and again stop acting like such a busy body. that quote was meant for bushman and quoted to bushman and its bare minimum courtesy to not get involved in a dialogue between 2 people. is that CLEAR?

roman sacked mou or roman and mou had a falling out but 6 years later, SUPRISE SUPRISE, moun is BACK. these guys are professionals. they ll deal with it. plus we are talking about a zlatan transfer in the case cavani joins psg. if he does that what options do we have cavani - psg, falcao- monaco, lewa - does not want to come, aguero - very settled, dzeko - city just sold balo and tevez in 6 moths with no replacements, rooney - manu will milk the transfer, rvp - not happening unless 40/50 mil. so world class strikers left would be higuain/villa and that is barely an upgrade from torres/ba. so fight or no fight, attitude/ no attitude, zlatan will be better for us. u can say what u want but stop being a busy body and getting urself involved where u r not wanted. learn your limits and stay within them.

imbecile is an insult? i would say its the magnitude of wrongness (well i would have used some other word but u would have thought that as an insult too) that prompted me to use the word "IMBECILE"...

we have jose. if their is a coach who i would believe to control zlatan's attitude, it would be him. plus i would deal with zlatan's attitude anyday than with torres incompetence. do u know all the history among every member that ever existed on TC. i really dont think so. so butt off from where u r not needed/required. u dont know what happened before among me and the person i quoted, so lets not get noses into places where they dont belong.

i dont think i quoted u. why presume that its for u? anyways atleast i dont use racial insults.

some of the posters are unbelievably imbecile in thinking that a young squad means - 25 players below the age of 23. this is reality not fifa/fm. get over it. zlatan/ shrek (as i hear people calling him) would make us stronger, a team that can challenge for CL and should win PL. zlatan/shrek are way better than the strikers we have now and if we can get them plus offload torres and/or BA, it would be the perfect thing for chelsea.

i would put WINNING TROPHIES, way before any of the things mentioned above. zlatan is still a classy striker and heads and shoulders above any of the 3 we have currently. lukaku is good but still raw and maybe in 2/3/4 years' time, he ll get there, but among the current options i would say zlatan is the best because cavani is way too expensive, rooney would definitely be sold to us at an OTT price and lewa does not wanna come here.

if he goes to psg, we should definitely get zlatan.

never seen him play so i will reserve my judgement about him. but as far as the board goes, this is a stupid move considering the type of youth players we already have. chalobah, ake, josh, romeu, kdb and not to forget even OSCAR. what we needed right now was a world class DM who good be head and shoulders above most people on the football field. de rossi would have been IDEAL. so in my opinion not a very good use of 8 mil (thats what i heard) as it does not solve any problems that we currently have.

good riddance

i think performance should be the sole criteria to judge how valuable a player is. i think that is the only reason mata won our player of the season 2 times in 2 years whereas torres is ridiculed by his own set of fans. i was not putting words into any1's mouth. but when u hear some1 saying that mata "is worshipped because of his trophy collection." , u do start to wonder who exactly thinks that.

i think only u worship mata because of his "trophy collection"... the rest of us do because of his brilliant play-making, passing, vision etc etc. and that is where the difference lies between mata and torres.

why would napoli sell him at anything other than his release clause? the guy is a game changer and they know it.

i bet we ll buy him back in 2 years' time.

but even one bad performance from kdb would have had people wanting to drop him and "GIVE MARIN A CHANCE".

good move... this means kdb will get his oppurtunity...

what about mark schwarzer... we wont need to spend 10mil on him...

well i meant that they would be left with just these 2. anyways manc vs manu player vs player comparison would have made us come to the conclusion that city should have won the league comfortably but instead they lost it some 5-6 games before the end of the season....

why dude why??? but u know what... to get rid of torres i would accept everything except for jose getting sacked, if u take that clause out of here, its still a better deal than watching the blondie walk around in matches doin nothing.

no one can deliver in every game they play. but the no. of times DD did deliver for us in big-games was what made him a legend.

DREAM MOVE - cavani comes to chelsea. city stuck with dzeko and aguero only with good replacement for balo and tevez. deadline day - torres to city for 30mil. and i will live happily ever after till the end of my days...

probably there in lies your problem dude. you think only a head shot can kill a person, but under all other conditions a human should work as well as those guys in the game do, having a 100% efficiency no matter what. anyways people can call cech shit and they wont be critised as much as if they call him SHORT, simply because its not true and any1 with a milligram of a brain can see that. calling cech shit IS a difference of opinion but calling him short is plain stupid. similarly DD is many things, he is a LEGEND, a noble man,a leader, a drama queen,an attention seeker etc etc... but calling him LAZY is plain stupid. and calling him a LAZY BASTARD (i dont know if u did or some1 else did), is BLASPHEMY.

2007 - FA cup final against united. 2009 - FA cup semi final arsenal. 2009 - fa cup final everton 2010 - fa cup final portsmouth 2010 - fa cup semi final villa. 2012- fa cup semi final tottenham 2012- fa cup final liverpool. 2007 - carling cup final arsenal 2008 - carling cup final totenham 2008 - ucl semis against liverpool 2009- ucl semis liverpool 2012 - ucl semi barca 2012 - ucl final against bayern. but u r right. we should forget all of this plus his golden boot winning 2009-10 season because of moscow.