didierforever

actually, baines/cole have to be the best options u can have for LBs. RBs are the one who give me the creeps. johnson, walker. i would rather play jones (the face) over any of england's proper right backs. ps - be happy that england are playing with rooney and sturridge upfront. in 2010 WC they played with heskey in that position.

england are lacking a CAM, 2 wingers, 1 GK and atleast 1 strong CB. rest is fine.

2 more goal, i hear!!! but would not count as it is not for chelsea, right?? also he is definitely not ready!!!

ooohh... never gonna happen. mceachran displace sessegnon... very very unlikely. sessegnon is quality.

we will face competition to sign any good player. but the only teams who are in actual need of pogba in us or united. dont know much about monaco but psg would be awesome with a pivot of veratti-pogba. he would be a nice strong buy for them. plus he is french so would make even more sense for him. arsenal definitely wont go for him. ramsey, wilshere, with arteta and flamini and diaby on the injury list. still am not convinced that city would go after him

who can argue with that.

thats a bit harsh on our board. except for the striker region, our transfers have been pretty good. city just bought fernandinho for 40mil. yaya is one of the best CMs in the world. with the likes of garcia, rodwell on the bench, pogba will be stupid to choose city over us.

we do need a DM but would u buy pogba for something like 30-35mil? even 25 mil is a stretch, i feel.

hmmm!!! maybe!!! not sure. he definitely is not a wonderkid, and we dont want him THAT BADLY. 20 mil or at max 25 mil has to be the limit. but he is really good. pogba-rambo pivot would be phenomenol.

pay them what they demand. mikel+5/10mil. or 15-20mil.

and how did u get to that conclusion?

negredo has been a real suprise. i mean specially with jovetic just bought, aguero and dzeko already in the team, i thought he would be a 25mil bench warmer mostly. but so far, amongst all the 6 "big" clubs (us, manchesters, spuds, arse and pool), he has got to be the best buy so far (ozil included).

sign him up!!!!! NOW!!!

i thought u would like it, since u like suarez so much!!!

totally agree with what is said by "mufassir". wba have some really good options and josh would add nothing to them. only PL team midfield he ll be able to break in would be palace.

best of luck in life.

torres is wishful thinking. i dont think he ll go. but not so sure about mikel. specially if we buy a world class DM. i mean then we will have rambo, mvg, romeu, josh, essien, chalobah, and bender/witsel/gundogan. mikel himself might see that he wont be getting the oppurtunities and might want to leave.

did he use his hand? was is intentional (like suarez when he stopped the ball against ghana). it was accidental. an accidental touch. and for that u called ba a cheat, and said he assisted by "cheating". so what am i supposed to think?? the ball touched his hand, but there was no whistle, hence he played on. for THAT u called him a cheat, so what is the only other think he could have done, for u to not call him a cheat? i am not putting words into your mouth, i am just extrapolating your explanations which when seen from the other point of view, seems (in the least) bizarre. the attitude that can actually weaken a team is that u r blasting a player, who starts after a month, plays well, infact was our most potent threat in the first half, and is still ridiculed. i think ba is better than suarez FOR CHELSEA, because i cant fathom the dressing wars and splits when an egoistic, diving, cheating, cannibal like suarez joins CFC.

buy another one, hopefully he ll go then...

wait,which one of them plays for chelsea who are a european giant in a european trophy while the other "gifted footballer" plays for a mid-table team who came what 7/8th last season in PL. saying that we "cheated" for the first goal is childish, senile and downright stupid. and using this as an example to say that our players are "saints or not" is rubbish. i mean a player gets a favorable decision but he should stop the game and give the ball back? is that what u want? no one here is being inconsistent, except for u who are making a mountain out of a mole-hill.

???

and i have said again and again that he was our most potent threat on that day. so how was his performance not good? on the other hand u are taking a handball totally out of context. i dont think any of the norwich players complained even after we scored. should tell u how minimum the contact was. so the "blatant handball" argument is BS. i seriously think u need to know the meaning of cheating before accusing any1. ba did not cheat. he got a favorable decision. wait, why am i even replyin to somethin as silly as this. the person who thinks ba and suarez are guilty at the same level, definitely has some issues. i mean a person who does not know the difference between going down easily and diving, unfair decision and blantant cheating... goes on to show many things. u should be sorry to bring up ba and suarez in the same sentence. because one of them is a good human, while the other is a cannibal.

biting a player, delibrately diving , calling a person racist names is equivalent to getting one decision? so are norwich defenders cheats when ba dint get the penalty? or is chicha a cheat for not saying that he was offside when he scored the winner against us in 3-2 defeat. what happened on saturday is a part and parcel of the game. some "decisions" go your way, others dont. but getting a decision is one thing and doing things like suarez does is completely different. how can you even compare these two things? i mean what did ba "get away with"? one favourable decision is very different when compared to simulating, and thats what suarez does.

fair enough. so?

an assist, two decent chances (by rudy mistakes), one chance misses by ba on mata-thru and one on rambo low cross. i would say the strat was very fine but the execution was not. that is true. jose made the game open with bringing hazard and etoo on for cole and ba. thus enticing norwich to go for the kill. but just for the sake of it, etoo had no role for the goals. even for the 3rd one, he should have passed the ball wide to willian rather than trying to take 3 men on.