didierforever

for a team that lost 7-1, this is just that too the captain.

Saymyname seems just too familiar!!! "You name it" who he sounds like??

and yet sometimes people crib when he makes a tackle. or rather go to schurrle thread and parise him when he comes on for 20minutes, plays a good game when his team is only winning 5-0, against a disheartend, disorganized, getting booed by their own fans team. well life does seem fair. also its suprising how one person can single luiz out for his crap performance and yet cant give the due to a player who actually performed well. i mean the only way rambo could have stopped the mauling in the first half was if he got harry potter's invisibility cloak and went on the pitch and starting doing some magic. but guess what, when he came on the pitch, he did change the game on its head. but who the hell cares. its only rambo!!!

and yet somehow it is ESSENTIAL for them to be managed properly, is not that so? infact more important than anything for the development of their character!!!

in the first 20 minutes of the 2nd half was the best player on the pitch. germany barely had attacks down the brazilian right flank as he was tracking back while muller and schurrle kept tearing into marcelo and the brazilian left flank. created 2/3 clear cut chances and one was parried by neuer. he was head and shoulders above any and all brazilian on the pitch. the defence was a joke, fernandinho and paulinho were shit, oscar had another nothing performance. rambo did almost everything right. also, he came on as a winger. but yes, he was shit!!!

so mata dint put ina request, kdb dint put in a request but you are somehow 100% sure that lukaku did. what the hell is jopse playing at u would ask!!!! its been an year since the request (apparently, again). in that time we have sold luiz, mata, kdb, essien, let go off lamps, cole, etoo but could not find a decent deal for a PL proven striker who has 30 goals to his name in the last 2 seasons. are we being serious here??? if jose dint want lukaku here, you can damn well put everything on the bet that lukaku would not have been here. he was presented with a challenge and he panicked. a 20 year old boy panicked and made a wrong decision. and so did our board and the world's best manager by caving into his demand. lukaku could have been made to play for us. and thats how u manage teens. remember what SAF tried to do with CR when he wanted the transfer to madrid? jose dint, as much his mistake as lukaku's. as for not talking about lukaku to a certain members, i know who not to be talking to. STILL A CHELSEA PLAYER. STILL THE BEST STRIKER WE HAVE IN OUR ROSTER.

------courtois------ --azpi-GC--JT-RR-- ---fab/rambo-matic--- -schurrle-willian--hazard-- -------costa-------- at this moment,, this team seems the perfect line up!!!

when an article starts with "It is understood ", i think i will take my chances with believing what seems more appropriate!!!! u still have not given me a reason why lukaku was not sold off even a year after he apparently asked for a transfer by someone like jose who sold mata to a direct rival and a potentially great player in kdb on their requests!!!

the goal that defines luiz is the first schurrle goal. he lets in not 1 but 2 strikers between him and dante. not behind him but ahead of him!!! and thats luiz for u!!! anyone remember anichiebe??!!!

so whats changed? have we bought messi, zlatan, falcao and cavani? right now we have not even got costa officially!!! our 2 strikers are ba and torres!!!! also give me a link to where jose says that lukaku asked for a transfer. all jose said was "ask him why he is not at chelsea?" which can also mean that he asked for a loan rather than a transfer which makes more sense since lukaku is still here. i mean dint kdb and mata get their transfers when they asked for it!!! lukaku surely would have got his.

can't bother!!!! Really can't bother!!!

The person I quoted said something of the order of would u replace willian with schurrle?I said I would rather replace oscar with schurrle. Please tell me what that would mean? Please tell me how I twisted anything? Is not our main trio of Ams willian- oscar-hazard right now??? If someone says he would rather want schurrle in place of oscar, aCHELSEA fan or rather ANY chelsea fan would understand that he means willian/hazard thru the center and not schurrle. Really dude, its not rocket sciemce like I said befote. Or the minimum u can do is read what I wrote and what I quoted to understand the context. This is a forum like u said and most of the times people will write in a way that is comfortable to them, they would not be thinking about ways to explain everything to shery33 specially when it is so obvious. Willian was good for chelsea, oscar was not. That's what matters. Oscar is in terribke form, willian is not, another thing that natters. And if u can't see how poor/average oscae has been after the croatia game and those 2 chnces agaibst mexico, then I am sorry, I can't waste my time.

1)Muller goal - didnt mark. 2)Klose goal - Just standing there 3)Kroos 1 - Just wandering about 4)Kroos 2 - Who? Where? What? 5)Khedira - Decided that Im midfielder. 6)Schurrle 1 - Just standing in the middle. 7)Schurrle 2 - Behind the striker.

oh!!! see sherry33 another person understands and says the same thing, does not he!!! i really was not talking about rocket science, was i?

What role did willian play for us towards the end of the season when oscar was dropped time and again. Was it the AM role? Oh I think it was!!! How shocking...So would a schurrle- willian- hazard trio make sense!!!! Why not!!! Infact another person made the same comme t, dint he!!! But well, u would require to know a certain details of our players to understand the majority of the posts on here which is well, out of your pay grade. But anyways... keep the oscar love fest on...

i would start the next season with schurrle instead of oscar!!!

How is it that this thread is active only when he makes a mistake or even half of it. Showed more balls than all the rest combined. Was pretty good from the moment he came on. Keep it up rambo!!!

What a beast!!!!! Not good in counter attacks, and too skow .. this guy is a world class player.

Definitely NO. Which begs for the question to be asked... why exactly dint jose throw lukaku out when he actually (apparently) asked for a transfer.

Some of the people's opinions really make me laugh. What do those guys want us to say? That luiz was picture perfect in this 7-1 humiliation? He was the bkoody captain. The captain that we wanted for chelsea ( ). He started the humiliation by loosing muller for the easiest of goals. 4 goals within a space of 6 minutes will always go down to lack of character and leaderahip on the pitch. Character is not just hokding up neynar's shirt during the anthem. There is a lot lot more than that to be a true leader. So happy we are rid of him.

Luuz... ... leader indeed...

The onlt thing more pathetic than lukak's statements are the people who are holding down a personal grudge agaibst him. He asked for a loan... so what?Is he still our player? I think I asked u the same questtion and am yet to get answers to tjose questions. If lukaku dis ask for a transfer, why was not he sold? What has changed since then, has he performed poorly... hell no. So u mean to say that since we have costa, u r fine with toores and ba as backups?

again? i think we have been thru this!!!

"manage" him... tell him to shut up... have no media interaction... fine him... or at the least give him a chance to prove himself on the field and prove his worth!!!! that is what we are supposed to do!!! selling off our a potential world class striker... a 21 year old PL proven striker in a team whihc has torres and ba as their only striker right now!!!

2014-15 : pogba 2013-14: cavani and falcao 2012-13 ; hulk 2011-12 : modric some players who will be linked with us thruout the window with next to no chance of us actually buying them!!!