didierforever

jose has made mistakes, a lot of mistakes, a lot and lot of mistakes, but the more i think of it, the more i feel, we should not sack him because of cunts like cesc, costa and bang average no gooders like oscar.

nope. but chelsea at the bridge was sure shot money. i am blaming jose for the lack of revenues that i am generating.

a draw? we will get a point out of this game?

there is only one way to deal with underperformers and that is kick them on the butt. i am sorry, but all this has done is seal his own coffin. just for this weekend, i just hope that he leaves behind the fifa ratings and actually start players on merit. fuck costa, fuck cesc, fuck oscar, drop iva and drop JT. for once do the right thing.

actually i agree to the thought process. losing to leicester was "expected". that is what we have come down to. our expectations have come down from PL or CL to not even expecting a point against leicester. i can understand why that would set off alarm bells. i felt his post match to be very good. jose was an idiot to stick with cunts like costa and cesc and average players like oscar for so long. i just hope he backs himself up drops all the underperforming deadwood (costa, cesc,oscar, iva, jt), wins the bloody game and then shoves it in everyone's face. even if its supposed to be his last game, i just hope he makes a statement.

and normally he does not? you are telling me that hazard does as much defensive work as oscar or willian? hell, even cesc does more defensive work than hazard. what problems are you talking about? both of spurs' CBs could have been sleeping and they would not have missed anything. also, lets not call him an AM. he plays as an AM for us, but he is a forward, a defensive liability. thats his only move left. he wont stay on the wing to provide us any proper width despite like you said, us having a RB playing as a LB. most of the time he is wandering around the pitch with no discipline and leaving azpi exposed or others to do his work. and now we are blaming azpi and iva for hazard being shit. i accept that the tactics are stale and have been found out and in general our full backs hamper our attack but i am sorry, if you cant see the MASSIVE difference in hazard's shit play. in 14/15 (for PL and CL):hazard had an average of 5.2 dribbles per game which has gone down to 2.5 this season. honestly cant remember the last time he even made a useful dribble. as for play, his goalscoring movement has been non-existent, and his general play has stunk so bad that he was substituted once at around HT. he is not a goalscorer, and yet a player who relies on individual brilliance which is something that he has not provided to us this whole season."he was good against spurs", what was he good at? a striker being good at doing the defensive work. what did he "create". what did he provide to us that remy could not have and more. he is a creator? what has he created this season. please enlighten me. its been halfway through our season, and the player who was supposed to carry our attack and be the center of it all has let us down MASSIVELY. hazard is our epicenter of attack. he has been so shit, that we are where we are. the entire team is set up in a way to enhance his abilities. play a defensive LB to not let him worry much, give him a free rein, so on and so forth. he is as much to blame as cesc is for our current predicament.

thank god!!

can u give me a link to that interview all i could find is this http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/newsid=2209081.html which has nothing of that sort. also, in that way, i feel pep has a more defensive thought process than jose. pep uses attack/possession to slow the game down and bore the other team to death. but irrespective of that, they can actually teach their respective teams on how to attack.

hence what i wrote above "obviously no player is going to bad mouth their current employ. i am not sure exactly what tibo had said, but i would rather believe my own eyes and something which is so apparently clear as the day and night on which team is better in attack."

mourinho praised costa for his job against arsenal, mourinho thinks that playing iva as a RB ahead of azpi is a valid choice. mourinho also thinks that remy is not better than costa at the moment, mourinho also thought that bertrand was not worth giving a chance, that oscar was a better no.10 than kdb and mata. so lets not play "mourinho praised". tell me of the chances he created against spurs? and yes, he did get a free rein compared to willian/oscar/pedro etc etc or any other chelsea AM/ST that has ever played. also, what problems did he create for spurs? he got a free header which he missed. thats all i remember. its laughable, cos these days a good performance means doing nothing in defence, and simply been able to dribble past a player once or twice. what chances are you talking about? the dribbling past a player and then crossing the ball into a box filled with 8 opposition players and costa? oh yes, thats gonna get converted every time. he has 0 goals and 4 assists in 1848 minutes of play this season. LET that sink in for a moment.

he agrees with "joining the biggest club in the country". did not he?

but but but, cunt fibreglass captained arsenal at an age of 20. :lol:

the interviewer asked said '“you’ve joined the biggest club in the country” and reeled off the trophies they’d won'. to which cole answered, 'Yeah, if you put it like that, I suppose you’re right' and Liverpool used that as the headline to the interview. obviously no player is going to bad mouth their current employ. i am not sure exactly what tibo had said, but i would rather believe my own eyes and something which is so apparently clear as the day and night on which team is better in attack.

under jose? best of luck, mate. there is only so much development one can make sitting on the bench watching the team lose and put in shit performances match after match.

exactly my point. players will say stuff which puts their current employers in a good light. anyone who watches ATM on a consistent basis, will know for sure that their attack is far more drilled and way better than us and not just based on individual brilliance.

did not you get the memo. we should have a "small" squad. and who needs rotation when you can keep putting the same 11 every game regardless of the circumstances. also to be fair to jose, none of lukaku, kdb, mata, bertrand and now RLC, kenedy and remy were ever "ready".

joe cole had said that pool is the best club in england or something like that. players say stupid things for the sake of it for their current clubs. just saying.

what a sad day. was just placing bets this weekend, and could not bring myself to even place a double chance (w/d) on chelsea at the bridge against fucking sunderland. thanks jose, thanks a fucking lot.

give me one instance of ANYONE saying that we should bring FSW "home". FSW is one of the most over-rated managers around here. but even he got us a 3rd spot and a europa league with a squad which was 10 times worse than this. with a squad having moses, marin, yossi, torres, ba, ramires, mikel, lamps ( as our best CMs) and no backing from the board to get any transfer targets whatsoever. so while i dont like FSW one bit, i can atleast appreciate the work he did here compared to the one being done by our current manager who has done nothing but absolutely destroy the club from inside.

hhahaha.. have grave needs of a LB and we are buying our 3rd RB. bunch of clowns - jose and the board.

ATM is a very good attacking unit. watch them play. yes, they have the tendency to close shop at 1-0 and go on the counter after that, but look at them play and try to open up defenses which is generally very good and a lot of it is down to their attacking ploys.

norwich? spurs? stoke? LOL. and lets talk about his role in a match against spurs. he is the only one who does get a free rein. and its not even like he is being double marked these days. i doubt if he is even being marked these days. cant press, cant defend, does not look like he even wants to play for the club. such pussies can fuck off to RM and get booed by their crowd

in that case, we should not sell jose even if we get relegated, right? cos no one else has a CV like his. what was luis enrique's CV before he joined barca? the only clown candidate is jose mourinho himself. any half decent manager in the world would be having us walking the PL. we dont have an identity, we dont have any youth integration despite hving the best youth talents in the world, and we are 16th in PL with 15 points in 16 games. tell me on what basis do you think that jose is a better candidate to take us forward than these "clown candidates"? please give me your arguments. also, if jose is leading united next season then i will be happy cos i will know united will be a circus. yes, they will win 1 title in his firt 2 years but after that, he will tear the club down from the inside. talents like jones, smalling, martial, shaw etc etc will be DESTROYED. players like lingard who are looking so good, will suddenly not be "ready" for first team action. i am sorry but people keep giving the "it could be worse" argument, but they need to answer how it will get better under jose. its not people who are jst thinking about short term. its our fucking manager who is doing that. selling future stars like kdb, lukaku, selling some very good players like bertrand and mata and replacing them with cesc and luis.

as soon as the new manager starts winning games, playing good football like this team should be, all the match going fans will forget about jose. i dont see the match going fans crying about mata or making banners like "bring back mata". there is only so much space for emotions in any field. beyond this point, it is simply FOLLY to keep jose.

JT has been shit for most of the season. one good game against porto does not change that. is not this the same logic people gave against bournemouth too. oh this is clearly the type of game for cesc. well, there are no games for shit players. hazard has had more than his share of chances. kenedy can do a better job.