Elliott

Its on BBC too. But just cause a bid is going to be made doesn't mean its going to be accepted!

Welcome Danny. Feel free to ask any questions you have!

Personally I think we didn't have a plan b for the Robinho signing because there was simply no-one else worth buying.

From what I've seen of both players, Stoch is the better player. Sinclair has struggled to make a real impact in games when he's played for us, whereas Stoch came on against Stoke and basically inspired us to victory.

Welcome to Talk Chelsea!

I think starting a weakened team of players hungry to make their impact will leave us in better stead than playing a first team.

You obviously completely missed the point Linda was making on this one. Scolari always chose Bosingwa and Deco, yes. But he didn't appear to have any other options instead of Robinho, which was what she was talking about.

How can a club just sell their player to a third party without the player agreeing!!?

I'm talking about over the season. Sinclair was available over the Christmas period when Malouda was injured but he didn't get a look in!

Always stick around unless I've got some place to be very quickly.

He should've given Sinclair a run out with Malouda playing shite and being injured, but he never did. But if he starts now that'll do I suppose!

Happy birthday!

£9million is a very good price for Malouda. But when we only have him and Kalou as fit senior wingers until the end of the season, I guess we're gonna have to stick with him.

Well maybe Cudicini will have a little twilight to his career. I hope we stick with what we have, to give the reserve keepers a chance to develop.

You know us signing Michael Johnson could be very much like when we signed Frank Lampard.

Arteta can play on the wing, but I don't think he's the type of winger we need. We need real pace... like Sinclair and Stoch.

I doubt Mark Hughes had anything to do with the negotations for Kakás transfer.

Command & Conquer series. Haven't been able to keep up because my computer's crap, but the old ones were great. Tomb Raider 1, 2 and 3. Got progressively less good unfortunately, but the first one especially was a great game. Sim series. Including SimCity, SimCity 2000, SimCity 3000, SimFarm, SimAnt, SimTower, SimEarth and SimIsle. And The Sims as well I suppose, before they introduced 50 million add-ons and turned it into a huge franchise. Old FIFAs, especially good on the Sega Mega Drive.

He looks like a good player, but I think we've got enough young strikers at the moment and would be better to get a senior striker if we're going to get rid of Drogba.

Because they sense we might be one of the more vulnerable top 4 at the moment so depleting our squad would be a good way to undermine us further and then overtake us.

Carvalho maybe?

I'm inclined to go with the thread title at the moment any how. Looks it to me. I'd rather be playing Di Santo than Drogba to be honest.

Exactly what I think.

Well, no, I doubt the club would have printed his middle name as his shirt name on the programme (although apparently they spelled Jeffrey wrongly). I suspect he just uses both parents surnames and has decided to stick with Van Homoet professionally.

Aha right okay. My suspicion was confirmed then. Thanks!