nadavTKL

@ChelsTransfer Jose Mourinho wants Benteke after missing out on Edinson Cavani (Telegraph) #CFC #AVFC its on their paper tomorrow. so its Times and Telegraph who picked it up till now.

So the training stars now or those pics are from morning? nice to start your 2-4 (idk) hours work day in 1PM

Dracula?

i know he's an idiot but anyway.. @tancredipalmeri 24 דקות The future of De Rossi will be more clear after this evening when Roma manager and director will have a meeting

It could make them him and Lukaku insanely competitive when they both also compete for the spot in the Belgium team. Im not sure if its good or bad, depends on if they are good friends or not. Mou played 3 season with strikes who arent as good as Cavani and Falcao (Benzama and Higuain), maybe he's just fine with 2 very good strikers compete for 1 spot? also Lukaku and Benteka could torn world class in a season i think.

Chelsea have made a new bid on Daniele de Rossi around €18M. (Sky Italia)

Its reported that they gonna have to pay 5% to his old clubs. so it makes it 71m Euros. i dont see how can someone be so upset about the club, he aint Ronaldo. I dont think its the "Torres Effect", its just money that only clubs like PSG and Monaco will pay, Real, us and even City wont pay that, never. I'll get upst only if we wont get a big striker.

So you realy think we offered 59m? Its probably 71m, its ridiculous. i was all for it like you but thats fine by me if the club doesnt want to spend this amount on one player. Im realy hope we wont pay for it and get a world class striker.

@ChelsTransfer Chelsea's offer in the final hours for Cavani was €59m before De Laurentiis closed the deal with #PSG once the clause was met (Calcio) #CFC When we know its the stupidest rumor we heard, maybe thats the reliability of the news about the Torres+35m, 50m and than 52m bids from us.

So tomorrow we could see some footage from the training ground? nice

Rooney, Messi and Neymar in Barca's line up, and a season after they played 4 CM's alot? no way. Also Pedro is important for them i think.

@ChelsTransfer The final meeting between #PSG and #Napoli is set to be in the next 24-48 hours which would discuss the 5% to be paid to Cavani's old clubs (Danubio & Palermo), various committees bringing the total cost of the operation to €71m (RMC) lol if its true... he isnt close to be Ronaldo or Messi. 70m fuck sake, i never made players fee's a deal when we have Roman, but thats A LOT.

Im thinking on De Rossi, what will be better for him than joining Jose and Chelsea right now? it could change is name, he's already a world class player and one of the best midfielders in the last decade, but a successful time here will give him much more. And i dont think it can be compared with playing in PSG in Ligue 1.

My dream is De Rossi+Rooney. Two big time players, experienced, leaders, just imagin the *four* maestros with them in one line up.

I actually only play Fifa and only online.. but yeah maybe i got it from there I dont think like you, yes with Hazard, Mata, Oscar and KDB around the midfield is the part that will get us the W's most of the time, but i think its important for every top team to have a very very good striker to finish what they started alot of the times. I think its important enough to spend 30m-40m on it. and btw i think our striker can bring 30+ goals in a season with this kind of players around him, if he will be good enough. If the midfield will be the pivotal part? ok, i dont see the reason to settle for strikers like Ba and Torres who are clearly not strikers for CL and PL champions.

1. Like i said - if we want to buy another striker - we can sell Ba. If we want, its possible. 2. Why Ba? because you cant sell Torres, simple. 3. Why getting a striker? some people arent sure about the Torres-Ba-Lukaku trio, maybe the club isnt sure either, probably not it seems. Got to say your post seems really naive, like the subject "new striker for Chelsea" is new to you. 4. I dont know why it doesnt make any sense to you. Sometimes teams want to improve the quality of their squad, so yes you can sell a player who has 3 years in his contract, and get someone better. doesnt make sense to spend 30m? why not? 5. If we put Ba on the "transfer list", you know there will be interest in him. he's a good striker. 6. I dont think Ba did well in his time here, he didnt get to the level he showed in Newcastle thats for sure, and more importantly he couldnt show he's way better than Torres. Like i expected at least. 7. "The rumors, like all other rumors, are 99% BS." thats your opinion really. i cant say the rumors about West Ham and WBA are true, but i cant say they arent. most of the time you know it in the end of the saga.

if we'll play Oscar-De Rossi-KDB, i think it can be deadly. But we should see... Spurs midfield really lacks creativity through.

If we cant get Rooney or Lewa (thats it for me), so Lukaku can take the place. But i want us to try and get someone out of those two first. CHOULO19, Yes we signed Ba in January, but there is no law about not selling a player 6 months after you buy him. I think Ba was never going to be a steady at Chelsea, i can see him leaving this summer especially when we hear teams are interested (in England and in Russia, so they say at least). You're making it so complicated like we are in some kind of trap. If we really want a new striker, we can sell Ba. (even loan Lukaku maybe, something I don’t want off course).

@philmcnulty New Man Utd manager David Moyes may have insisted Wayne Rooney would not be sold - but was unable to say he wanted to stay. This will run. anyone saw it? what did he say?

where can i see the PS? cant find it on Sky steams...

I think Modric flopped. For the reason people thought he's in the level of the top Spainish midfielders and for me he showed in La Liga that his techniques are worse when playing with/against them, he cant realy play in the pivot because his game isnt aggressive enough and he cant be too dominant in this level. Mou didnt liked him in that position and preferd him as a CAM. As a CAM he wasnt creative enough, not even close to Ozil. If he was so good and special like most english fans claim, he would have played more and not seats on the bench all that time. He was good in Old Trafford, but i think you're tottaly overeating this. man u played awful with 10 players on the pitch, the all Real team played wonderfull since Nani got the red card. Nice goal, yeah. I dont think the name "Hulk" changes somthing in people's minds, its is sick shots and great stats from Porto. 60m is like 120% too much for him imo.

i realy dont think its true. Actually, after we signed Hazard, the Hulk rumors went down for a while and then got back in the end of the transfer window but with bad sources and nothing official about a formal bid. I think most of it was BS, like the rumors about him linked to us now. We dont need a "true RW" right now and i dont think we missed it last season. Especially not a super overated player like Hulk. Im actually glad we missed out on all of those players: Pastore, Modric and Hulk. All of them turned to be flops imo.

But what if he understand no non-English club is after him? i think he would still like a move to a better team he can win trophies with. We hear nothing about Real Madrid till now.

We dont know when they are getting interested in a player. i can also assume that they moved to Cavani only when they got their manager, and they moved to De Rossi only when it was understood he'll might leave this time. Anyway its not something we need to care about because we arent Arsenal, we have the money to pay for him. We need to bring it to the level that De Rossi need to decied between us and PSG.