Articles
Read the latest Chelsea news and opinion from our main website.
8,406 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 565 views
-
-
- 0 replies
- 585 views
-
- 0 replies
- 353 views
-
- 0 replies
- 557 views
-
- 0 replies
- 554 views
-
- 0 replies
- 309 views
-
- 0 replies
- 310 views
-
- 0 replies
- 558 views
-
- 0 replies
- 345 views
-
- 0 replies
- 373 views
-
- 0 replies
- 590 views
-
- 0 replies
- 563 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 595 views
-
- 0 replies
- 413 views
-
- 0 replies
- 307 views
-
- 0 replies
- 353 views
-
- 0 replies
- 327 views
-
- 1 reply
- 432 views
-
- 2 replies
- 750 views
-
0 members are here!
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Posts
-
-
It works like a car insurance, if you keep crashing your premium goes up and this club despite spending billions need to start watching what goes out that does not need to be and with Reece the premium will be through the roof as well as wages being outlayed and zero return Being injured i s a major problem for the club, the wage bill and the player.By Special Juan
-
I fully believe KDH was a was to pay big compensation for maresca but not have it on the books officially....By Marvin123
-
Well he scored a hat-trick against Wolves and we won 6-2 this season 😄By Stats
-
You can't just have talent after talent - especially when some will have to sit on the bench. Conor is good enough to start somewhere but not good enough for the football we play here. Lavia, Enzo and Caicedo are levels above Conor - so your replacement needs to be someone of the KDH level that knows how to play the system and can fill the void when an injury does occur. The issue has been that KDH has had trouble adapting into our squad, and hasn't been as effective as thought. A mo
By Thor
-
I don't mind if those that come in are perceived as an upgrade. KDH for Gallagher? 😐 Chalobah's predicament became apparent, even when he scored against Tottenham. However, I believe no one was prepared to part with money for him, so the board took the next best thing in their opinion. I mentioned it before his loan was finalised: his flexibility and PL experience make him a great asset, despite his flaws. It's not about whether they are good enough but who replaced them. Is KDHBy LAM09
-
We couldn't get 20m for him last summer. After great performances in Palace we could get 35m.By NikkiCFC
-
Gallagher is nowhere near the quality of Caicedo, Enzo and Lavia Chalobah is okay but not close to Fofana or Colwill's level. We sold Omari Hutchinson and brought in Neto. I don't think they're overpaying for subpar replacements at all. If anything, it has helped improve the first XIBy Strike
-
-
I still don't get why we had to sign Kellyman from Aston Villa...there were other offers for Maatsen. I was expecting the club to at least get a decent squad player from Aston Villa, not a youngster that will likely play zero minutes for us. KDH was a Maresca signing, I don't think it's Maresca not trusting him, he just looks off the pace.
By Reddish-Blue
-
I'm not questioning his quality, but a player who never plays has no value. If he joins the Saudi league at 25, considering his quality, that'd be a very early retirement.
By robsblubot
-
To be fair, with the way the PSR rules work, selling academy graduates is such an easy loophole. With Chalobah, what was the actual strategy in loaning him out....he's not a 20 year defender that will develop at Palace, he's already a squad player You either sell or keep him around as squad depth (unless Maresca wasn't a fan and wanted him out).
By Reddish-Blue
-
-
Player Threads
