1-0 or 4-3?

[Guest justin_3d]

1-0 for me. Cech keeping that clean sheet is important too. not matter what besides with cech in goals i dont reckon seeing many 4-3s and with luiz ivanovic Alex terry cole etc in defence we shouldnt be conceding 3 Anyways

if roman wants 4-3 im sure we will see turnbull in

And i didnt see the sun mentioned in that rule in the post above

So you are telling me the Sun is not unreliable as them???

And to make it worse, goal.com takes source from everywhere. The worst, and the good. They take if it from the sun, the daily mail and such.

Unreliable source overall.

[eldo 868]

What's wrong with 7-0?

[kwylino 329]

So you are telling me the Sun is not unreliable as them???

And to make it worse, goal.com takes source from everywhere. The worst, and the good. They take if it from the sun, the daily mail and such.

Unreliable source overall.

No. im just simply saying the sun was not mentioned in the ''unreliable sources rule''. so i dont see it bending the rules somewhat

[Guest justin_3d]

No. im just simply saying the sun was not mentioned in the ''unreliable sources rule''. so i dont see it bending the rules somewhat

Look at what is says:

such as

It just gives you an example. It does not means that the SUN is out of the woods. Same is for the Daily Mail.

[Henrique 9,133]

The Sun dont need to ask Roman, because everybody knows he loves attacking football, and everybody who loves attacking would prefer a 4-3 win than a 1-0.

And more than that, if two teams have the same points, and the same goal difference the number of goals scored determines who win the Premier League. So yes, winning for 4-3 is better than 1-0.

[eldo 868]

The Sun dont need to ask Roman, because everybody knows he loves attacking football, and everybody who loves attacking would prefer a 4-3 win than a 1-0.

Read what Tomo and others wrote. I wouldn't prefer 4-3.

Even when you play attractive football the match can end 1-0.

[Henrique 9,133]

Read what Tomo and others wrote. I wouldn't prefer 4-3.

Even when you play attractive football the match can end 1-0.

then you are silly, read what i said:

"And more than that, if two teams have the same points, and the same goal difference the number of goals scored determines who win the Premier League. So yes, winning for 4-3 is better than 1-0."

[HRiver 1,512]

How is winning 4-3 better than winning 1-0? The difference would still be one goal.

[eldo 868]

then you are silly, read what i said:

"And more than that, if two teams have the same points, and the same goal difference the number of goals scored determines who win the Premier League. So yes, winning for 4-3 is better than 1-0."

Lmao we aren't talking about titles but about single game. What about scoring goals without conceding them?

3x20=60 <=Bottom of the league defence 4x20=80 <=Top of the league attack. I know what would I choose.

[Henrique 9,133]

Lmao we aren't talking about titles but about single game. What about scoring goals without conceding them?

3x20=60 <=Bottom of the league defence 4x20=80 <=Top of the league attack. I know what would I choose.

Foolish.

[eldo 868]

Foolish.

Would you mind to explain what is foolish?

[Henrique 9,133]

Would you mind to explain what is foolish?

because you cant realize that 4-3 is better than 1-0.

[kwylino 329]

also mind itd be much more tiring for our forwards to grab the extra goals And i mean they cant do it All the time like. And also we play in the PL with teams like man utd City arsenal And co. they can be capable on their best day of scoring more than 2-3. 1-0 seems the best route

result matters.

stupid post is stupid

[Madmax 9,219]

7-0. Every single fucking time.

[zolayes 14,489]

because you cant realize that 4-3 is better than 1-0.

for once you are actually correct ,,,but do you have to be so offensive..Is rudeness a Brazillian national characteristic ...think not as our players

seem fine . Guess it is just your way of trying to be contoversial ..suggestion ,,,visit a charm school