Jump to content

Wayne Rooney


J.F.
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chelsea should not go above 30 million.

Does not make economical sense to pay 40 million, when we can just wait till next season and they will be forced to sell!

I believe if we are to wait for a year then Rooney shouldn't be considered as a primary target then.Its either now or never.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Why would a transfer request all of a sudden make Manure sell him to us? LOL

Generally speaking players forgo loyalty bonuses when they hand in a transfer request. In my opinion the Glazers would never sell him without the formal transfer request, and Rooney's camp would always be loathe to make one if they don't have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally speaking players forgo loyalty bonuses when they hand in a transfer request. In my opinion the Glazers would never sell him without the formal transfer request, and Rooney's camp would always be loathe to make one if they don't have to.

This time the bonus is a lot as well, around £3m straight cash. :ph34r:

I believe if we are to wait for a year then Rooney shouldn't be considered as a primary target then.Its either now or never.

Agreed, by then Lewandowski is a free agent and if we offer him like £250k per week he might be able to be persuaded to join. Who knows if he still want to move to Bayern next year, actually since he is worth around £40m anyway and if we are getting him on a free, we could just offer him like £5-£10m as signing on bonus and still have a bargain on our hand providing he keeps his form up. Who knows, other top strikers might be available as well, Ibra might want to leave after failing to win over Cavani/Falcao might move if Monaco fail to comply with FFP...etc

And all sort of other possibilities, this is like Modric back then. If we don't sign Rooney now we will probably never do it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what?

Where is this from? and your conclusion is a bit off...

Uumm. . that was a cheeky comment! Making fun of Rooney since he has a problem reading and writing! (or is it just writing). hence not to be taken seriously!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He probably wouldnt be benched tho. Its a world cup year and Roo is gonna need to play so I'm fairly certain they could use him without fear

I know, was just replying too someone's comments. He would start and play with RVP, but probably deeper as a second striker. He would probably score fewer goals then outcome the "I told you so" and "is declining / all washed up!!!" comments. Much like last year when he played out of position / second fiddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many players who hand in a request remain at a club for very long. I might be wrong, but rejecting said request, then benching him could probably be taken to arbitration, certainly grounds for constructive dissmisal.

There is absolutely no legal obligation by a club to attend a supposed transfer request.

Not many people stay at their clubs after they handle a transfer request, but just as many arent allowed to join a direct rival.

There are two emphatic recent examples. RVP with Arsenal and Lewandowski with BvB. What do you think Manure will prefer to do? (especially after what happened last season, when van Persie basically gave them the title)

These are ppl remember they have rights, you can't let them rot in the reserves.

As far as benching Rooney, of course they can do it, as long as there isnt anything on his contract that stops it from happening (which I doubt Ferguson would have agreed on).

This argument of him being a human being and he cant root in reserves is complete bullshit. Leaving a player on the bench or in the reserves team doesnt infringe in any labor law nor human rights. Just look at Malouda and many other examples!

As for forcing a move to Real or Barca, they have yet to show any interest and would have done so by now given how long this has rumbled on for.

We dont know if any other team will show interest in Rooney, but Manure will try to sell him (if they do) to anyone besides an English team.

People say they need to sell him due to high wages (etc), but they really dont. United operated in decent profit for the last 2.5 fiscal years, they dont need to cut losses nor make money. If they do indeed sell him to us, it will be because they 'wanted' (or at least allowed).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wayne Rooney not in #MUFC squad that departs for pre-season friendly in Sweden today. The reason? A shoulder injury ...




HAHAHAHAHA of course, of course. (may be genuine but id bet against). This the same shoulder injury he played against Betis with?



That poster Utd made about his return looks pretty fucking embarassing now, cnuts


Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is absolutely no legal obligation by a club to attend a supposed transfer request.

Not many people stay at their clubs after they handle a transfer request, but just as many arent allowed to join a direct rival.

There are two emphatic recent examples. RVP with Arsenal and Lewandowski with BvB. What do you think Manure will prefer to do? (especially after what happened last season, when van Persie basically gave them the title)

As far as benching Rooney, of course they can do it, as long as there isnt anything on his contract that stops it from happening (which I doubt Ferguson would have agreed on).

This argument of him being a human being and he cant root in reserves is complete bullshit. Leaving a player on the bench or in the reserves team doesnt infringe in any labor law nor human rights. Just look at Malouda and many other examples!

We dont know if any other team will show interest in Rooney, but Manure will try to sell him (if they do) to anyone besides an English team.

People say they need to sell him due to high wages (etc), but they really dont. United operated in decent profit for the last 2.5 fiscal years, they dont need to cut losses nor make money. If they do indeed sell him to us, it will be because they 'wanted' (or at least allowed).[/]

Malouda was left out of the first team and given the option to leave. Since nobody would match his wages he chose to stay. Same with Bogarde and Anelka. It's not bullshit, show me an example where a player handed in a formal request, was benched and a transfer was rejected. It's not about human rights its breach of contract, it's like someone changing your role at work from MD to office admin, it's grounds for constructive dismissal.

Anyways, he isn't going to be benched (as you put it), more than likely play 30+ games. But every press conference is going to be about Rooney, everytime they lose it will be about Rooney, it's going to be Rooney, Rooney, Rooney!!!

Enough to make you mad, enough to unsettle the squad, enough to ruin a whole campaign. Doubt Moyes needs or wants the distraction.

And I doubt he is signing a new contract. So your flushing £30 million down the drain as his value goes down next year, if your a PLC that's bad business. And one thing the Glazers need is £££s.

Either way Jose wins, was a great tactical ploy by him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wayne Rooney not in #MUFC squad that departs for pre-season friendly in Sweden today. The reason? A shoulder injury ...

HAHAHAHAHA of course, of course. (may be genuine but id bet against). This the same shoulder injury he played against Betis with?

Maybe he's so unfamiliar with how to write that doing that transfer request actually injured him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You