DDA 9,941 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 If Chelsea have learned anything from the results given from Torres' overall form, we would NOT even think about offering them 50m... that is astronomical, and way too much! There are other strikers out there that match Cavani's ability and sell for much less than that! Just look how much Man City spent on Aguero! £35m and just look how many goals he's scored for them, compared to Torres, who joined us last January... it proves a preposterous point!This is why we falter at transfers... the asking price! When someone slaps a price tag on the player that's just way too much, we pull out of a deal... then when City come knocking, they offer much less, and suddenly there are negotiations! I don't know if it's because of the fact that City have well-paid high quality executives, or the fact that the executives we have just don't give a fuck!Well said! Im a huge fan of Cavani but if its going to take 50million Euros to buy him then shake the head and move on. All we need is another Torres saga! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 How can negotiators' "charm" influence the price? It's not like 35million is worth more when their executives look nicer and are paid more. Only money talks.. if we offer 50million and they reject it, and somebody else offers 35 and they accept it, then it's the stupidity of the selling board, not the wisdom of the buying party. Either that or we don't offer hookers as an unofficial part of a deal.This is what happens when negotiators do things behind closed doors. They like to offer the sweet talk to force them into a deal! You only need to look at what happened when they stole Robinho from us after discovering their "profound wealth" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 There are other strikers out there that match Cavani's ability and sell for much less than that! Just look how much Man City spent on Aguero! £35mBang on. Ability being the operative word. Cavani is definitely a natural born striker, but I'd rather spend that money on a versatile striker like Pato or Hulk. A striker who can beat players. Aguero what a miss he was, what rubs salt in the wounds is how hot our pursuit was for many years. He consistently talked big of us and he somehow ended up at City. Amid Torres capture it was rumored we still pertained interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 i'm watching napoli last 2 years, and Cavani is going to be one of the best strikers in the world, if we can get him we can find a great replace for big Drogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calculatingInfinity 1,472 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 i'm watching napoli last 2 years, and Cavani is going to be one of the best strikers in the world, if we can get him we can find a great replace for big Drogs.As a serie a follower (and Palermo fan ) I completely agree, sadly I just really don't think he would go to Chelsea as it looks at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hd123 5 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 As a serie a follower (and Palermo fan ) I completely agree, sadly I just really don't think he would go to Chelsea as it looks at the moment.Of course he won't. Because we won't go for him @ 50m. If we havent learned our lesson, I will be truly disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Bang on. Ability being the operative word. Cavani is definitely a natural born striker, but I'd rather spend that money on a versatile striker like Pato or Hulk. A striker who can beat players. Aguero what a miss he was, what rubs salt in the wounds is how hot our pursuit was for many years. He consistently talked big of us and he somehow ended up at City. Amid Torres capture it was rumored we still pertained interest.Aguero ended up at City probably because alot of money was being stuffed in his agents pocket! I agree with you about the striker issue i think Cavani is an excellent pkayer but he just isnt worth 50million euros i would prefer Pato who would probably be cheaper! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hd123 5 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Aguero ended up at City probably because alot of money was being stuffed in his agents pocket! I agree with you about the striker issue i think Cavani is an excellent pkayer but he just isnt worth 50million euros i would prefer Pato who would probably be cheaper!Aguero went for 15m less than our pretty boy bench warmer and is 1000000x times superior to him at the moment. He is also heads above any other striker in the league bar RVP (who is 29), any agent fees or his wages would have been worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Aguero went for 15m less than our pretty boy bench warmer and is 1000000x times superior to him at the moment. He is also heads above any other striker in the league bar RVP (who is 29), any agent fees or his wages would have been worth it.Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players!You trolling mate? lolOn topic though I really think Pato should be priority .Like I said already Pato's ability to beat a player - like Kun or even Suarez - is an asset that would aid any team. His speed is something else too - IMO he'd easily give Ronaldo a good run. I won't be forgetting his goal against Barca any time soon (Here it is for those of you who don't know what I'm talking about) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hd123 5 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Definatley would have been worth it! He is a top player its a shame we didnt get him! Though i think Suarez is as good as him and a fully fit Hernandez isnt far behind the 3 of those players!Hernandez is not even close to aguero or van persie. He's just a tap in specialist with otherwise no remarkable footballing qualities. Aguero can take on his man and make a great pass, or strike a magical ball from the edge of the box. Hernandez can't, he's one dimensional and while he has great off the ball movement (great requirement for a striker) he will never be anything more than thatAs for Suarez, his finishing is woeful, and again not near the top strikers in the league.The top five are: Dzeko, RVP, Balo, Aguero and Ba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Whats trolling son? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Hernandez is not even close to aguero or van persie. He's just a tap in specialist with otherwise no remarkable footballing qualities. Aguero can take on his man and make a great pass, or strike a magical ball from the edge of the box. Hernandez can't, he's one dimensional and while he has great off the ball movement (great requirement for a striker) he will never be anything more than thatAs for Suarez, his finishing is woeful, and again not near the top strikers in the league.The top five are: Dzeko, RVP, Balo, Aguero and BaWhat? Suarez is easily on the level of Aguero! He plays in an average Loserpool team! His finishing is woeful? I really dont think so mate! His work rate, link up play and ability is nothing short of class considering he has to win games for Loserpool by himself at times!As for Hernandez yh maybe his overall game isnt as good as RVP and Aguero but he is a striker and stirkers are meant to score goals end of which is the point i was trying to make when comparing the 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hd123 5 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 What? Suarez is easily on the level of Aguero! He plays in an average Loserpool team! His finishing is woeful? I really dont think so mate! His work rate, link up play and ability is nothing short of class considering he has to win games for Loserpool by himself at times!As for Hernandez yh maybe his overall game isnt as good as RVP and Aguero but he is a striker and stirkers are meant to score goals end of which is the point i was trying to make when comparing the 3.The amount of great chances Suarez misses are astonishing. I agree with you on his other qualities, but he is not a clinical finisher. As for Hernandez, like I say, very good poacher but not a top striker who could contribute far more to a team.Think we should try Ba, reminds me a lot of pre-Chelsea Torres, but he has some knee problems IIRC? Might be risky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TacticalBlues 2,817 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Whats trolling son? Trolling Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value. = trollfaceIn this case, I thought that your Hernandez remark was a joke because it was so outlandish IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Trolling Trolling is trying to get a rise out of someone. Forcing them to respond to you, either through wise-crackery, posting incorrect information, asking blatantly stupid questions, or other foolishness. However, trolling statements are never true or are ever meant to be construed as such. Nearly all trolled statements are meant to be funny to some people, so it does have some social/entertainment value. = trollfaceIn this case, I thought that your Hernandez remark was a joke because it was so outlandish IMO.Oh ok well thanks for clearing that one up mate! Ill try not troll in future posts!For the record i hate Hernandez and his annoying head! Just think he is one of the top strikers in the Prem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calculatingInfinity 1,472 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 What? Suarez is easily on the level of Aguero! He plays in an average Loserpool team! His finishing is woeful? I really dont think so mate! His work rate, link up play and ability is nothing short of class considering he has to win games for Loserpool by himself at times!As for Hernandez yh maybe his overall game isnt as good as RVP and Aguero but he is a striker and stirkers are meant to score goals end of which is the point i was trying to make when comparing the 3.Suarez finishing is pretty bad. Even the scourers are getting frustrated with him although he is obviously still a very useful player. IMO the best striker in the league has been RVP for quite some time, hopefully he won't renew his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDA 9,941 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 RVP deinatley the hottest striker in the prem. He played a shcoker today and still scored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hd123 5 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Suarez finishing is pretty bad. Even the scourers are getting frustrated with him although he is obviously still a very useful player. IMO the best striker in the league has been RVP for quite some time, hopefully he won't renew his contract.Rvp was rubbish prior to last season averaging 4-8 goals a season in the league. Now he is truly amazing, however at 29, doesn't represent a good buy for anyone. sLOVEnian Blue 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. 2,742 Posted December 16, 2011 Share Posted December 16, 2011 http://www.talksport.co.uk/sports-news/football/premier-league/transfer-rumours/1377/89/chelsea-step-interest-napoli-hot-shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts