Badboy 1,526 Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 We went as absolutely far as we could to be honest, with the financial problems we had. £100million in debt. We really could've done a Leeds. A bit like everton we were punching above our weight yes thats true. 100 million in debt would of sent us down im sure. Man utd are 700 million in debt do you think they can handle that ? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/...ord-season.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 We definately would have found a buyer. Ofcourse he wouldnt have been as lavish as Roman has been for us. The thing that happened with Leeds was that, they brought a lot of Loans from Banks with the hope that they would get alot of revenue from Champions League and TV Rights. they failed to qualify and all of a sudden they were doomed. On other Hand, the reason why I say we would have found a buyer was because WE QUALIFIED FOR CHAMPIONS LEAGUE....And we Hit the Jackpot with Roman. Had we finished 5th, we would have gone the Leeds way. FOR SURE. Thats one of the reasons, Roman sacked Scolari who is now managing a Club in Uzbek . We would have been doomed financially had we not qualified for Champions League. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SempreJuve 62 Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 what are your players wages a year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Far too much. In comparison to other top teams in England, we're in a relatively good position, financially. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badboy 1,526 Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Far too much. In comparison to other top teams in England, we're in a relatively good position, financially. We do need to cut the wage bill. Are we still paying sheva ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matterz 67 Posted June 11, 2009 Share Posted June 11, 2009 Well if we not paying Sheva at the moment, we soon will be when he returns cos that looks as though that will be our biggest signing. So basically Peter Kenyon is admitting that he miscalculated. Well theres a surprise, Peter Kenyon miscalculating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted June 13, 2009 Share Posted June 13, 2009 Well if we not paying Sheva at the moment, we soon will be when he returns cos that looks as though that will be our biggest signing. So basically Peter Kenyon is admitting that he miscalculated. Well theres a surprise, Peter Kenyon miscalculating. I dont know why everything comes down to Kenyon. Reasons why we may not reach out targets. 1) Sheva 30 yr old signed for 30 million for 130k pounds per week, was Roman's signing. It didnt work out, Blame Roman. 2.) Roman Sacked Jose, Sacked Avram, Sacked Scolari. Lots of millions wasted in paying them after they and their staff got sacked. 3.) Those sacking affected our onfield performances. No league in three season cus no Stability in the dug out. Blame Roman. Now where do you see Kenyon making a mistake here....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warnie_666 1,081 Posted June 13, 2009 Share Posted June 13, 2009 We do need to cut the wage bill. Are we still paying sheva ? The reason why our Wage bill is soo high is because, We are still paying money to Jose, Avram, Scolari and their staff, after their Sacking. The Wage Bill figure shown recently includes around 35M handed out as compensation to the 3 sacked managers and their staff. No we are not paying Sheva. Thats one of the reasons AC Milan took him back on loan last season. Or else it wouldnt have made sense, letting Sheva goto Milan and we pay his wage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SempreJuve 62 Posted June 13, 2009 Share Posted June 13, 2009 well as you all said far too much, i now buffon and del piero are on like 4mil a year does anyone know how much say lampard and terry are on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matterz 67 Posted June 14, 2009 Share Posted June 14, 2009 well as you all said far too much, i now buffon and del piero are on like 4mil a year does anyone know how much say lampard and terry are on? Closer to 6 or 7 mil I think... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.