Jump to content

Aston Villa 2-2 Chelsea


 Share

Recommended Posts

Can understand why they disallowed it for the foul, trouble is, in most, that happens in every box during most corners. In most goals on set pieces you'll find someone fouling someone somewhere in each slow replay.

Good performance, I'd of taken a draw pre match. Shame we haven't got a LW youngster to sub off Murdryk earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Vesper said:

we owe Brighton a proper hiding, on so many levels

They’ve become a punching bag of late, so totally doable.

which brings the point WTF did these owners saw in Brighton which was worth going all out for?!

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robsblubot said:

They’ve become a punching bag of late, so totally doable.

which brings the point WTF did these owners saw in Brighton which worth going all out for?!

tbh, the way Caicedo plays without Enzo, Enzo may, may end up being the worse buy

they play so poorly together, and Enzo is the type who needs a monster cast around him to shine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the push was just too obvious to not get called. It was also in the back of the player and at the exact moment just before the bounce, which is when  the football is to be disputed.

looked like a foul to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were robbed. How the hell they saw enough in that to overturn the original decision is ridiculous. Anyway proud of the team. Honestly was expecting a battering with the team we had out and the lack of experience on bench. Madueke was my MOTM. He terrorised Digne all game. Caicedo was excellent second half. Gallagher top performance too but I felt the pundits didn't give Madueke enough credit. He was sensational. Hopefully he can do the same against Spurs on Thursday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

I think the push was just too obvious to not get called. It was also in the back of the player and at the exact moment just before the bounce, which is when  the football is to be disputed.

looked like a foul to me.

If that's a foul then this game is dead, that shit happens every time the ball is in the air, nowadays if your stronger you foul players it's ridiculous, now I know why they call it player of the match instead of man of the match, pathetic 

Edited by YorkshireBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, nyikolajevics said:

Pushing, body against body.. First one was ok, this one I don't understand.

Still think its a foul. Would be wanting a foul for us if it were roles reversed so probably correct call. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

If that's a foul then this game is dead, that shit happens every time the ball is in the air, nowadays if your stronger you foul players it's ridiculous 

Think pushes right into the back like that are usually called tho.

it is certainly different now than it was decade or 2 ago. Lots more fouls are called in 50/50 disputes.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You