Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 01/09/2024 at 07:21, Vesper said:

we single-handedly funded Brighton to become the 2nd biggest spender

and look at the bottom two

5ca8bde80def211033e5e4c03224041e.png

 

Expand  

Brighton treat us like their cash cow.  3 players sold to Chelsea, 200 million.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 07:39, Reddish-Blue said:

If we had been able to sell Chalobah and Broja instead of just loaning them on deadline day....what a waste of a transfer window.  The only benefit was offloading Lukaku. 

Expand  

and Chilwell, etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

  • David Datro Fofana is still expected to leave Chelsea in the next days. Turkey, Greece, Portugal, Saudi and Holland among markets being explored to pick best option. Hoffenheim and Sunderland opened talks to sign Datro on Deadline Day but negotiations collapsed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 18:59, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

Expand  

brilliant profit if we get that 

20m quid more than we paid for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 19:35, manpe said:

If we are serious about his development (or upping his value), then loaning to Brazil makes no sense.

Expand  

Couldn't agree more.

Flamengo actually has the best striker in teh country, Pedro, who flopped in Europe (Fiorentina), but is still better than what the other sides have there. He is recovering from a hammy, but should be back soon. So, it's likely Deivid wouldn't be starting too many matches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 18:59, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

Expand  

I'll believe it when I see him wearing the Al Nassr shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 19:35, manpe said:

If we are serious about his development (or upping his value), then loaning to Brazil makes no sense.

Expand  

If we were that serious about his development, he would have been loaned out much earlier in the transfer window, especially considering he spent last season doing nothing in the reserves and then making up the numbers on the bench. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 18:59, mkh said:

Ângelo Gabriel is close to moving to Al-Nassr .

They want him to fill the last U21 foreign vacancy. Chelsea have rejected two offers of £21 million and £25 million. They want £33 million.

(@venecasagrande) 

Expand  

Al Nassr seemingly have a taste for Brazilian youngsters. They want some company for Wesley.

At least we have someone to drop a few should they not turn out to be much (quite likely).

Edited by LAM09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 22:00, Reddish-Blue said:

If we were that serious about his development, he would have been loaned out much earlier in the transfer window, especially considering he spent last season doing nothing in the reserves and then making up the numbers on the bench. 

Expand  

We tried offloading him to Strasbourg, it's pretty clear how much they give a fuck about his development. Hope Al Nassr comes for him as well.

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/09/2024 at 22:04, Vegetable said:

Interesting to see how brutal revolving door business model Clearlake adopted here. If you think about how absurdly long likes Kenedy or Baba Rahman were here, wow, night and day.

Expand  

In one sense, the business model is good as ideally that's what you want to see, if the player doesn't fit or develop, flip them or sell them off. 

The only issue with the Clearlake approach is that they hoarded too many players in consecutive transfer windows.  Just look at the LW situation, you got Mudryk, Neto, Sancho, Sterling, Carney, even Felix all being paid from Chelsea's books this season. 

If we had a clearer plan, maybe Mudryk, Carney and a few others would be playing regularly elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2024 at 03:35, Reddish-Blue said:

In one sense, the business model is good as ideally that's what you want to see, if the player doesn't fit or develop, flip them or sell them off. 

The only issue with the Clearlake approach is that they hoarded too many players in consecutive transfer windows.  Just look at the LW situation, you got Mudryk, Neto, Sancho, Sterling, Carney, even Felix all being paid from Chelsea's books this season. 

If we had a clearer plan, maybe Mudryk, Carney and a few others would be playing regularly elsewhere. 

Expand  

Neto and Felix are not true LWers, and Carney is an AMF/CMF, never a winger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You