Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't believe the Havertz rumor one bit but he is versatile enough to play in different positions and given Lampard likes to change formation, it would make sense that he wants players that can play in at least 2-3 positions in the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jason said:

I don't believe the Havertz rumor one bit but he is versatile enough to play in different positions and given Lampard like to change formation, it would make sense that he wants players that can play in at least 2-3 positions in the team. 

Honigstein and Johnson are very reliable though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blues Forever said:

Honigstein and Johnson are very reliable though.

Sorry, what I meant to say is, I don't believe we would actually go for him. We may be interested but I don't think we will actually buy him. 

And besides, they didn't say we are negotiating with Leverkusen for him, just interested (aka Monitoring FC). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jason said:

Sorry, what I meant to say is, I don't believe we would actually go for him. We may be interested but I don't think we will actually buy him. 

And besides, they didn't say we are negotiating with Leverkusen for him, just interested (aka Monitoring FC). 

That's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jason said:

I don't believe the Havertz rumor one bit but he is versatile enough to play in different positions and given Lampard like to change formation, it would make sense that he wants players that can play in at least 2-3 positions in the team. 

Versatility also allows a smaller squad and as a consequence a more happy one.

That's why I look forward to Gallagher's return, he played in literally every midfield position for Charlton and strikes me as the type of player that could play literally any outfield position to a high standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MoroccanBlue said:

So why buy Ziyech? 
 

Silly season rumor without a doubt. 

becuase we are losing both our RWers

and it's a bonus that both Ziyech and Havertz can play AMF as well.

simple

I do not see anyone asking why buy Sancho

and he is not a even a hybrid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Vesper said:

becuase we are losing both our RWers

and it's a bonus that both Ziyech and Havertz can play AMF as well.

simple

I do not see anyone asking why buy Sancho

and he is not a even a hybrid

If we are upgrading Willian/Pedro to Ziyech/Havertz then expectations will be high next season. 
 

I also don’t find anything simple in spending over 100 million on a player that is similar to what we already have in Ziyech, when a LB, ST, and CB are needed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You