BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Was useless as usual in the 40 odd minutes he was on the field. The link between defense and attack that he was supposed to provide was completely missing. He took 9 touches on the ball to complete a grand total of 3 passes in 40 minutes. As a result our defenders had to step up for that role as well (luiz's pass to hazard).He was just another body on the pitch in the game. 0 tackles, 1 interceptions in 40 minutes of football and people here are raving about him.And here, children - proof that stats mean fuck-all in football.I have eyes, and those eyes saw Mikel do a very good job in man-marking and denying the likes of Ribery and Shaqiri - who were given freedom beyond measurement whilst Ramires was on to do their thing - the space and time needed to create a match-winning moment. didierforever 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted September 1, 2013 Share Posted September 1, 2013 Lol link between attack and defence? we had no attack, Lukaku was playing as CM ffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleed_blue 136 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 And here, children - proof that stats mean fuck-all in football.I have eyes, and those eyes saw Mikel do a very good job in man-marking and denying the likes of Ribery and Shaqiri - who were given freedom beyond measurement whilst Ramires was on to do their thing - the space and time needed to create a match-winning moment.And your post is a proof that yoy saw fuck all.Or you dont really understand the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleed_blue 136 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 He came on when we had 10 men, we weren't playing football anymore. We parked the bus, and it was clear he was under construction to just keep it simple. He provided added defensive solidity and such, which our offense to not completely sacrifice their attacking game (until late in extra time when we were desperately trying to hang on), but I don't even want to discuss it with you since you clearly hate anything he does.Stop wanking over every mikel appearance on the field. He is paid to play football not for you to see his face and feel happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 i know i am not supposed to use words like "idiots" against whatever "opinion" is being generated by people but the level of #@$##$%#@ is immense. mikel might not be the best DM in the world, might not be the best DM even in our team when we dont even have another recognized DM, but to say he was poor against bayern is ,,,, well,,,, to put it very very very very mildly WRONG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English Freak 456 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Stop wanking over every mikel appearance on the field. He is paid to play football not for you to see his face and feel happy.Whats your issue with Mikel?He's still a useful player to have in the squad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 And your post is a proof that yoy saw fuck all.Or you dont really understand the gameStop wanking over every mikel appearance on the field. He is paid to play football not for you to see his face and feel happy.I suggest you have a look at this: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/16732-opinion-tolerance/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 And your post is a proof that yoy saw fuck all.Or you dont really understand the gameAll it proves is you don't have the intellectual capacity to look beyond your own opinion. Goodbye xxx The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Stop wanking over every mikel appearance on the field. He is paid to play football not for you to see his face and feel happy.Wtf? I'm barely "wanking" over him. Is this what it has come down to now? Wow. Anything slightly positive over Mikel and it's called wanking over Mikel. Wow. BlueLion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Driver 503 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Can you really get banned for calling out a terrible footballer?wow. bleed_blue, on 02 Sept 2013 - 11:50 AM, said:And your post is a proof that yoy saw fuck all.Or you dont really understand the game bleed_blue, on 02 Sept 2013 - 11:51 AM, said:Stop wanking over every mikel appearance on the field. He is paid to play football not for you to see his face and feel happy. This is even on the icon list ,some people need to grow some and not be so precious,I think the main gripe is that he opposes your opinions,anyway Jose is confirming what we are saying on here and I sensed that when Jose looked Mikel in the eye when he was looking for penalty takers and Mikel turned away ,that was when Jose decided that Mikel does not have the bottle to play for us,he should be standing up to be counted with his experience when the sh1t hits the fan and he did not want to know and I sensed Jose learned something more about his character at that moment and it was further confirmation that he lacks the courage to play for Chelsea as well as the ability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Personally I think he should have been sold (only if we had of replaced him that is) And if he is as good as some say it wont matter, he wont fit into the system regardless. We wont have many games like we did against United and Bayern, this isn't five years ago, we aren't counter attackers anymore. We keep the ball and look for any option to get a goal, our play requires good movement, passing, creativity and first touches.However this is Mikel's fault he failed to perform when he had to fight for his place. When Essien was out for 6 months two seasons ago it was Mikel's time to flourish, he failed. He had a bad season last season and we can't keep making excuses, sorry Mikel fans but the results haven't been positive for him. The best option is to move on and replace him. Blue Armour and didierforever 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjperdeath 2,226 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Will play against Everton . Win the MOTM, and score a last minute penalty. Heard it here first. *runs away* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Personally I think he should have been sold (only if we had of replaced him that is) And if he is as good as some say it wont matter, he wont fit into the system regardless. We wont have many games like we did against United and Bayern, this isn't five years ago, we aren't counter attackers anymore. We keep the ball and look for any option to get a goal, our play requires good movement, passing, creativity and first touches.However this is Mikel's fault he failed to perform when he had to fight for his place. When Essien was out for 6 months two seasons ago it was Mikel's time to flourish, he failed. He had a bad season last season and we can't keep making excuses, sorry Mikel fans but the results haven't been positive for him. The best option is to move on and replace him.Phil Driver, why can't you just make a diplomatic, non aggressive post like this? You can get your opinion across neatly like this you know? Kojo and The Mak 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kojo 4,676 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Phil Driver, why can't you just make a diplomatic, non aggressive post like this? You can get your opinion across neatly like this you know?In all fairness I was probably worse about this a year ago, but I know what you mean. The Skipper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Driver 503 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 I fail to see how my post can be considered aggressive and after seven years of watching Mikel diplomacy is out of the window . I have very strong opinions on his ability and his worth to Chelsea and I want to see the back of him for the good of the club and am hopeful Jose has him sussed . It would seem a lot on here do not agree with Jose's decision to bench him ,I do ,so you could say I am backing our managers judgement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleed_blue 136 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 I suggest you have a look at this: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/16732-opinion-tolerance/Sure lose arguments and then start threatening people with bans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Sure lose arguments and then start threatening people with bans.I'm asking you, express any opinion you want, but please stop insulting other people's opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 In all fairness I was probably worse about this a year ago, but I know what you mean.You came up with that TIOTE IS BETTER THAN MIKEL shit though which was at least a bit funny, tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post! Kojo 4,676 Posted September 2, 2013 Popular Post! Share Posted September 2, 2013 You came up with that TIOTE IS BETTER THAN MIKEL shit though which was at least a bit funny, tbh.Tiote is a ball winning midfielder, a very good one as well, but I'm happy we never signed him because he's injury prone. We needed more aggressive players in our team and Mikel isn't aggressive in the slightest. However Ramires has flourished into a very good ball winning midfielder or box to box type what have you, so we've benefited in the end. robsblubot, The Mak, Blue Armour and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucio 5,418 Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 I would like mikel or ginkel to be given the nod over lampard vs Everton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.