Jump to content

🇺🇸 Christian Pulisic


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, nyikolajevics said:

 

Just like Pulisic now, Sterling was only 20 when he joined City. Media and supporters need to understand that these are kids in their heads and also their talent are raw. It took Sterling some time to be more mature and this could happen to Pulisic too.

Even better: who remembers Cristiano Ronaldo when he started to play for UTD? Ambivalent performances, whining like a lil bitch, diving, crying.. Look at him how he finished Atletico Madrid. Not even like a man, like a fucking gladiator. Ofc he is an exceptional example, but even players like Messi and Him become much much better than they were at the age of 20.

 

13 hours ago, Hazardinho Gaucho said:

He is in a position now similar to Malcom at Barcelona. In other words, he never plays but if he gets some random oportunity needs to do everything right. Its impossible to analyse players in this context. You need to give him at least 10 games in a row to take any conclusion.

Careful guys. That common sense might just fly over some people's head. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, manpe said:

If our transfer ban stands this summer, will he be able to join? Doesn't the ban mean we are restricted from registering new players, and they can be registered only during the transfer window?

We signed and registered him to the club in January. He's now just out on loan like every other loanee in our books. So, no issue here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jason said:

We signed and registered him to the club in January. He's now just out on loan like every other loanee in our books. So, no issue here. 

Oh shit, you're right :D I totally forgot that we loaned him out. I had this idea that he would sign when the window opens, dunno where it came from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My one concern with this signing, is that he fits the bill of all our typical Chelsea attacker/midfield signings.

Plenty of skill...not much end product.

We've gone after a lot of flashy players to fit the 'style' of football we want, but with very little substance.

Kovacic is a prime example.

...anyway, anything can still happen. So here' hoping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BlueLyon said:

That video is perfect example of what will never win you games. He stalls on the ball, beats a man and then loses it.

I'll never understand why they didn't pay 30 more for Sancho instead of Pulisic and get a much better player in return plus fixing our worries about homegrown, such a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Nicco said:

I'll never understand why they didn't pay 30 more for Sancho instead of Pulisic and get a much better player in return plus fixing our worries about homegrown, such a joke.

What makes you think Dortmund will just sell Sancho after half a season?

Also, paying 90 million for an 18-year-old who's enjoying only his first season at senior level hardly sounds like wise business...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jason said:

What makes you think Dortmund will just sell Sancho after half a season?

Also, paying 90 million for an 18-year-old who's enjoying only his first season at senior level hardly sounds like wise business...

Well PSG paid 150mil for a 18 years old and now it looks like shrewd business. I'm probably biased but Sancho is destinated to be one of the best which is why I think he is worth it at the cost of 100 mil. Also looking at the rumours he will probably go to United for around this mark which if he turns out to fulfill his potential it will be very good business for them. Also let's not pretend like the club targeted Pulisic only for his on field performances, half of it comes from exploiting the American market which frankly could've gone to Sancho who is the face of England in the next 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nicco said:

Well PSG paid 150mil for a 18 years old and now it looks like shrewd business. I'm probably biased but Sancho is destinated to be one of the best which is why I think he is worth it at the cost of 100 mil. Also looking at the rumours he will probably go to United for around this mark which if he turns out to fulfill his potential it will be very good business for them. Also let's not pretend like the club targeted Pulisic only for his on field performances, half of it comes from exploiting the American market which frankly could've gone to Sancho who is the face of England in the next 10 years.

But Mbappe at least already had a proper season before going to PSG. Led Monaco to the title and quarter finals of the Champions League. Sancho can't boast that, can he?

If things go according to plan with CHO, then we will have a player who is also the face of England for the next 10 years, no? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jason said:

But Mbappe at least already had a proper season before going to PSG. Led Monaco to the title and quarter finals of the Champions League. Sancho can't boast that, can he?

If things go according to plan with CHO, then we will have a player who is also the face of England for the next 10 years, no? 

Assuming he stays which I fear he won't but even if Sancho was here they could've played together since they wouldn't block each others progress. Also the comparations with Mbappe are there even if they played like shit against Totenham and they might choke the league title in Bundesliga at the end. I just hope if CHO does leave it will be to Dortmund with a buy back clause only way to fix this mess we got ourselves in. 

I'm not confident in Pulisic at all even though I remember him single handily destroying City and Liverpool in pre season, all will depend if we get a top striker or not because he clearly won't be scoring much for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Nicco said:

Assuming he stays which I fear he won't but even if Sancho was here they could've played together since they wouldn't block each others progress. Also the comparations with Mbappe are there even if they played like shit against Totenham and they might choke the league title in Bundesliga at the end. I just hope if CHO does leave it will be to Dortmund with a buy back clause only way to fix this mess we got ourselves in. 

If we get the transfer ban, then I can't see us selling Hazard AND CHO in the same window. Also, we're talking too much about ifs and buts here. What if we don't sell Hazard and/or CHO? What if Hazard stays? What if CHO stays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jason said:

If we get the transfer ban, then I can't see us selling Hazard AND CHO in the same window. Also, we're talking too much about ifs and buts here. What if we don't sell Hazard and/or CHO? What if Hazard stays? What if CHO stays?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...