Jump to content

Dani Alves


milka
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

15 hours ago, Special Juan said:

Still has miles in the tank, I would have him here. It's like the opposite end of the spectrum ala Marcos Alonso....Conte has made Alonso into a terrific player despite people saying he wouldn't cut it here, so because Alves has been around the block doesn't mean this would become a nursing home, he still has it.

Disagree with you here, there is a reason why evra and now dani alves can still contribute for juventus. Serie A is not as hectic in term of pace compare to EPL. There is no way Alves will last playing in EPL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 03/06/2017 at 4:07 PM, BlueLyon said:

Only two better options than Alves are Walker and Nelsinho, with former not possible as he is spurs player and the later costing big money, plus there is competition with Barca, Bayern and at least both Manchesters.

I would take Alves in hearbeat, still best RB out there. But yeah, he cant play every game, so that could be big problem.

I'm going to throw one more name in there for you - Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really thought we're in for him. What a shame. Can't be blamed though, the same way Bonucci would probably choose Chelsea over City because of Conte, the same way Alves has made his choice and it's Guardiola, someone he has worked and has a good relationship with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CHOULO19 said:

I don't really follow transfers closely, but can someone please explain to me why we are letting Alves go to City even though we desperately need wing backs and the role here would suite him better than that at City? 

cos he's too old for roman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, The Skipper said:

I'm going to throw one more name in there for you - Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. 

He has performed brilliantly for Arsenal there however that is not a position he wants to play. He wants to play CM. He would be happy to do the odd shift there but if any team buys him and plans on playing him RWB, he won't go. That is why Liverpool are trying to prize him away because they probably will give him the chance to play in his favoured position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really follow transfers closely, but can someone please explain to me why we are letting Alves go to City even though we desperately need wing backs and the role here would suite him better than that at City? 

Alves wants to play under Guardiola, I think.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stats said:

He has performed brilliantly for Arsenal there however that is not a position he wants to play. He wants to play CM. He would be happy to do the odd shift there but if any team buys him and plans on playing him RWB, he won't go. That is why Liverpool are trying to prize him away because they probably will give him the chance to play in his favoured position.

Playing in his favourite position or winning trophies with Chelsea as a starter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Skipper said:

Playing in his favourite position or winning trophies with Chelsea as a starter?

But he won't be a guaranteed starter. He has only played a few games at WB and been very good but so was Moses and he was a revelation but slowly started to fade. He still had a very good season though but was less effective towards the end of the season. Chamberlain could easily be the same and Conte would not simply make him a guaranteed starter. Unless it is someone who is proven in that position over a long period, that is the only way Moses will be dropped indefinitely. Can't see us making a move for Chamberlain. Even though he would stand a bigger chance of winning trophies, he does not want to play WB so don't see it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Beigl said:

Alves wants to play under Guardiola, I think.

Possible, but I think it would be a weird choice for him ahead of us because he will most likely get more playing time at a position he likes more and play a bigger role in the team here than at City.

I think it's more likely that we were just never seriously interested in him. Which is a shame considering how well he's played this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...