Marcos Alonso

[OneMoSalah 8,778]

21 hours ago, Vesper said:

Inter Considering Darmian, Marcos Alonso & Emerson Palmieri As Possible Full Back Reinforcements

https://sempreinter.com/2019/12/16/inter-considering-darmian-marcos-alonso-emerson-palmieri-as-possible-full-back-reinforcements/

They can have Alonso for 30-35m. Emerson no they can go fuck themselves 🤣

[Vesper 28,833]

5 minutes ago, OneMoSalah said:

They can have Alonso for 30-35m. Emerson no they can go fuck themselves 🤣

I will accept 30m euros (£25.5m due to strong pound) for Alonso and call it  day

that £20m loss (RM offered £45m in 2018 and she said 55m or no deal) is on Marina and that cunt Sarri

 

[Nicco 927]

Good to see him back in the team, for as shit as he is, he still has something to offer at least until we upgrade.

[killer1257 3,282]

I think he was our worst Player but he at least gave us the pen. But he has a very low Football IQ. There was a Situation where Spurs could have gotten a penalty

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

[Jase 43,479]

19 minutes ago, Nicco said:

Good to see him back in the team, for as shit as he is, he still has something to offer at least until we upgrade.

Problem is, he's good in a back 3/5 where his defensive flaws aren't so obvious and he can focus on going forward but he's totally hopeless in a back 4 when he's tasked to do with attacking and defending. 

[Tomo 21,733]

4 minutes ago, Jason said:

Problem is, he's good in a back 3/5 where his defensive flaws aren't so obvious and he can focus on going forward but he's totally hopeless in a back 4 when he's tasked to do with attacking and defending. 

Even in a back four he can still be useful against the fodder who barely bother to attack, he was good against Brighton and the difference against Newcastle.

However he shouldn't be playing (in a four) against top teams agreed.

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Tomo said:

Even in a back four he can still be useful against the fodder who barely bother to attack, he was good against Brighton and the difference against Newcastle.

However he shouldn't be playing (in a four) against top teams agreed.

But that's assuming teams only come to defend from start to finish, like Newcastle did. Otherwise, we need the entire team to turn up and dominate these smaller teams so Alonso won't be a liability for us. Don't think we want that, do we? Having 2 FBs like Liverpool do will be ideal. 

[Tomo 21,733]

7 minutes ago, Jason said:

But that's assuming teams only come to defend from start to finish, like Newcastle did. Otherwise, we need the entire team to turn up and dominate these smaller teams so Alonso won't be a liability for us. Don't think we want that, do we? Having 2 FBs like Liverpool do will be ideal. 

Lesser teams are more and more playing against us to defend, since Liverpool how much attacking has any of our opponents done at Stamford Bridge? 

I think the percentages make Alonso facing fodder sides worth the risk.

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Tomo said:

Lesser teams are more and more playing against us to defend, since Liverpool how much attacking has any of our opponents done at Stamford Bridge? 

I think the percentages make Alonso facing fodder sides worth the risk.

Bournemouth, West Ham, Aston Villa didn't really do it, did they? Newcastle came and sit back for 0-0 but those 3 sides sat back and tried to play on the break, maintaining some sort of offensive threat. We aren't at the level where we "forced" teams to just sit back and defend for 0-0, like Man City in past 2 seasons. If Alonso's really worth the risk, we wouldn't have heard of rumors about us wanting to sell him or buying a new LB. And moreover, he turns 29 on December 28. A new replacement is needed ASAP!

[Tomo 21,733]

6 minutes ago, Jason said:

Bournemouth, West Ham, Aston Villa didn't really do it, did they? Newcastle came and sit back for 0-0 but those 3 sides sat back and tried to play on the break, maintaining some sort of offensive threat. We aren't at the level where we "forced" teams to just sit back and defend for 0-0, like Man City in past 2 seasons. If Alonso's really worth the risk, we wouldn't have heard of rumors about us wanting to sell him or buying a new LB. And moreover, he turns 29 on December 28. A new replacement is needed ASAP!

I think what I'm trying to say is, if he's chosen over Emerson to be the new guys back up I won't be too upset.

He'd be an ideal rotation guy if we have say Newcastle at home in-between two CL ties with Barcelona.

[Jase 43,479]

Just now, Tomo said:

I think what I'm trying to say is, if he's chosen over Emerson to be the new guys back up I won't be too upset.

He'd be an ideal rotation guy if we have say Newcastle at home in-between two CL ties with Barcelona.

But if the first choice gets injured and Alonso suddenly becomes temporary first choice...? Between Alonso and Emerson, I'd rather keep the latter. Has more years left in him than Alonso. Besides, we need competition and Alonso isn't going to provide it.

[NikkiCFC 7,953]

We have 5 clean sheets this season and 4 of them came with him in the squad. He's not that much bad defensively comparing to Emerson. 

[killer1257 3,282]

We have 5 clean sheets this season and 4 of them came with him in the squad. He's not that much bad defensively comparing to Emerson. 

He fouled someone in the penalty box and we were lucky that the ref did not give Spurs the pen. He is just not good enough

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

[Jase 43,479]

5 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

We have 5 clean sheets this season and 4 of them came with him in the squad. He's not that much bad defensively comparing to Emerson. 

His goals and assists aside, Alonso's stats aren't very different from Emerson's. 

[Jase 43,479]

Don't know why people keep on finding reasons to justify Alonso's inclusion in the XI. Sure, he can do a job here and there and in a back 3/5 but if we want to get to where we want to, he's not the player to help us achieve that.

[Tomo 21,733]

2 hours ago, Jason said:

But if the first choice gets injured and Alonso suddenly becomes temporary first choice...? Between Alonso and Emerson, I'd rather keep the latter. Has more years left in him than Alonso. Besides, we need competition and Alonso isn't going to provide it.

If we want proper competition at left back then we have to get rid of both and sign two new players as neither do or ever will cut it playing regularly.

[Jase 43,479]

1 minute ago, Tomo said:

If we want proper competition at left back then we have to get rid of both and sign two new players as neither do or ever will cut it playing regularly.

That'll likely be the case but I doubt we'll sign 2 new LBs at the same time. We'll likely sign one next summer and then another one in 2021. But between the two to choose as back-up, I'll take Emerson. Younger than Alonso, which means he potentially has room to get better (we don't need a snail in the team!) and is on lower wages than Alonso (I think). 

[NikkiCFC 7,953]

I'm just stating facts. 

I'll be cool with Emerson being Chilwell's replacement from next season.