CHOULO19 24,332 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 10 minutes ago, pHaRaOn said: Batshuayi has acquired the nickname Batsman. That'll do! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milka 3,394 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 We  buy  Michy ,  but  Alvaro Morata ???  Maybe  Madrid keep him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton 2,120 Posted June 29, 2016 Author Share Posted June 29, 2016 Batsman coming? ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Sounds like it's done come the end of the day, fast moving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdlk 286 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 does this mean we wont sign Morata ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 1 minute ago, gdlk said: does this mean we wont sign Morata ?? All depends what happens with Costa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,073 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 54 minutes ago, Strike said: I disagree. Replacing Costa with an unproven Batshuayi (and maybe a new striker) doesn't make sense. Costa, at 27, is naturally to be the senior striker in the team. He is in his prime, playing well and with two years of experience in the Premier League. He's said nothing that suggests he wants to leave and is by all accounts happy at Chelsea. I actually think Costa and Conte will be a perfect match.  Diego may indeed be very happy, we don't know. Being happy is not the same as preferring to be here rather than somewhere else, but we don't know his feelings on that either. What we do know is that many accounts have been published claiming that Diego is unhappy in London, unhappy with his treatment by The FA, and yearning for a return to Madrid. Indeed Atleti's president has stated openly that Diego wants to return. It therefore can't be correct to say that by all accounts he is happy at Chelsea. By some maybe, but definitely not all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Apparently he's passed his medical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,489 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 4 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: Diego may indeed be very happy, we don't know. Being happy is not the same as preferring to be here rather than somewhere else, but we don't know his feelings on that either. What we do know is that many accounts have been published claiming that Diego is unhappy in London, unhappy with his treatment by The FA, and yearning for a return to Madrid. Indeed Atleti's president has stated openly that Diego wants to return. It therefore can't be correct to say that by all accounts he is happy at Chelsea. By some maybe, but definitely not all. Atletico wants him doesn't mean he is unhappy here. Yet to find a reliable outlet reporting that he wants out. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,073 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 21 minutes ago, Strike said: Atletico wants him doesn't mean he is unhappy here. Yet to find a reliable outlet reporting that he wants out. Â You said all accounts claim that he is happy. That patently is not true. Reliable? What on Earth is that in the land of the transfer rumour? If you ask me, a quote attributed to Atlet's president seems as close as we can hope to come to such a thing. It's very unlikely that the head of a major football club is going to outright lie about about the intentions of another team's player. Maybe he is lying or perhaps the quotes have been misreported or maybe my memory is failing me and the stories only reported the president to have said it rather than actually claiming to be quoting him. Any, or all, of those situations are possible. It is not possible however to sustain the idea that all accounts say Diego is happy. They simply do not and you know it. Edit: Just checked and Enrique Cerezo is quoted as saying Costa wants to return. Major news outlets don't put things in quotes willy-nilly because they know doing so leaves them open to legal action. Further, as far as is publically known, Atleti have not sued any of the organisations which reported those quotes and nor has Diego issued a statement denying that he told Cerezo that he wants to return to Atletico. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM4PR3Z 411 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 He is good enough to send Diego Costa to the bench. Strengths: Technically very good, fast, power, scores extremely easy and doesn't need a real chance to score, a lot of his goals come out of nowhere. Biggest weakness: is invisible for the majority of the game. 40M is a good price, Crystal and Tottenham also wanted to pay that amount, so the risk is low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,489 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 12 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: You said all accounts claim that he is happy. That patently is not true. Reliable? What on Earth is that in the land of the transfer rumour? If you ask me, a quote attributed to Atlet's president seems as close as we can hope to come to such a thing. It's very unlikely that the head of a major football club is going to outright lie about about the intentions of another team's player. Maybe he is lying or perhaps the quotes have been misreported or maybe my memory is failing me and the stories only reported the president to have said it rather than actually claiming to be quoting him. Any, or all, of those situations are possible. It is not possible however to sustain the idea that all accounts say Diego is happy. They simply do not and you know it. BBC and Sky rarely get it wrong. But it is besides the point. It makes no sense to sell Costa and replace him with Batshuayi (and probably another expensive striker). The club should retain him.  Costa is yet to work under Conte, I doubt he's unhappy about the new setup at the club   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MefiX19 1,092 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 I go to sleep and see that Crystal Palace is signing him and now he is blue wtf? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM4PR3Z 411 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 Just now, MefiX19 said: I go to sleep and see that Crystal Palace is signing him and now he is blue wtf? At noon, Marseille had a deal with Crystal Palace. In the evening they had a deal with Tottenham. Next morning he signed for Chelsea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,073 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 17 minutes ago, Strike said: BBC and Sky rarely get it wrong. I agree, they are usually accurate. I do not know them to be reporting Diego is happy but you are implying that they are and I accept your word on that. Their reports still do not constitute all accounts however so your statement remains wrong and you should stop digging. 17 minutes ago, Strike said: But it is besides the point. It makes no sense to sell Costa and replace him with Batshuayi (and probably another expensive striker). The club should retain him.  Costa is yet to work under Conte, I doubt he's unhappy about the new setup at the club I don't agree with you for the reasons I gave above but this statement of opinion is at least a proper subject for us to debate. For me, Diego would need to be much better to justify the hullabaloo which comes with him. If he should leave, and if his replacement(s) prove inadequate, then I reserve the right to revisit this conversation and change my mind. That is to say, to admit that you were right and that replacing Costa was a mistake. For now however, I'm all for making the change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,073 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 33 minutes ago, MCM4PR3Z said: He is good enough to send Diego Costa to the bench. Strengths: Technically very good, fast, power, scores extremely easy and doesn't need a real chance to score, a lot of his goals come out of nowhere. Biggest weakness: is invisible for the majority of the game. 40M is a good price, Crystal and Tottenham also wanted to pay that amount, so the risk is low. This is very encouraging. I hope you are right. On the other hand it's a bit discouraging that he is behind Lukaku for the national team. I don't want Lukaku back because I do not believe he is good enough so I obviously would not be enthusiastic about signing someone who is not as good as our former striker. I've watched the videos of course but have only seen Bats play 90 minutes once. In that game Marseilles were blown away by Rennes and I was focusing my attention on Dembele & Jed Boga in any case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,489 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 9 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: I agree. I do not know them to be reporting Diego is happy but you are implying that they are and I accept your word on that. Their reports still do not constitute all accounts however so your statement remains wrong and you should stop digging. I don't agree with you for the reasons I gave above but this of opinion is at least a proper subject for us to debate. For me, Diego would need to be much better to justify the hullabaloo which comes with him. If he should leave, I reserve the right to revisit this conversation and change my mind. That is to say, to admit that you were right and that replacing Costa was a mistake. For now however, I'm all for making the change.  We will likely spend over 50million (conservative estimate) on two strikers should Costa leave. Unnecessary imo There are several positions where we need an upgrade. Striker is not one of them. Costa is a perfectly good striker to lead the team and signing Batshuayi and whoever else will weaken the squad. I'm not for a change  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 A December 2015 profiling by FourFourTwo likened Batshuayi to Didier Drogba for his speed, strength, positioning and link-up play, despite being shorter than the former Marseille forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM4PR3Z 411 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: This is very encouraging. I hope you are right. On the other hand it's a bit discouraging that he is behind Lukaku for the national team. I don't want Lukaku back because I do not believe he is good enough so I obviously would not be enthusiastic about signing someone who is not not as Good as our former striker. I've watched the videos of course but have only seen him play 90 minutes once. In that game Marseilles were blown away by Rennes and I was focusing my attention on Dembele & Jed Boga in any case. Lukaku has had a career that started when he was 16, Batshuayi had the career of a normal big talent. So you can't compare that. Besides that, Lukaku has visibly improved every year so far, so I don't think he is too light for Chelsea now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,073 Posted June 29, 2016 Share Posted June 29, 2016 31 minutes ago, the wes said: A December 2015 profiling by FourFourTwo likened Batshuayi to Didier Drogba for his speed, strength, positioning and link-up play, despite being shorter than the former Marseille forward. I hope his link up is better than Didier's which was, in my opinion, generally weak. That's not to say of course that it was not sometimes good. In that famous Napoli game for example, it was out of this world but The Drog had shortcomings in each of the areas that go to make good link up play; control on receiving the ball, retaining possession by dribbling and accurate passing. There were spells in most games and stretches in each season where I would sooner have described his link up as poor rather than good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.