Jump to content

Pedro Rodríguez


Pacquiao
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 23/07/2017 at 14:44, mccg said:

Chelsea set to sign explosive winger with 7 goals in 16 games as Conte expands attacking options

http://www.chelsea-news.co/2017/07/chelsea-set-sign-explosive-winger-7-goals-16-games-conte-expands-attacking-options/

Expand  

What does this have to do with anything? We are not talking about Vitesse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 23/07/2017 at 16:36, manpe said:

What does this have to do with anything? We are not talking about Vitesse.

Expand  

Cfc looking for a winger dosn't say anything about Vitesse if you could even be bothered to read the article !:fainthv9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 23/07/2017 at 19:42, Sideshow Luiz said:

He just means that it's another one for the loan army and will probably be off to Vitesse if we sign him.

Expand  

Kinda knew that, but the post was just a follow on with the Pedro injury and the fact we are short in the position,the article said nothing that he would be going to Vitesse if we did sign him, there is no indication that he would go there , i wouldn't say it is a probable as we need another winger nxt season not afew years down the line. IF we do buy him without any other wingers think he will be into the squad ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 24/07/2017 at 08:18, mccg said:

Kinda knew that, but the post was just a follow on with the Pedro injury and the fact we are short in the position,the article said nothing that he would be going to Vitesse if we did sign him, there is no indication that he would go there , i wouldn't say it is a probable as we need another winger nxt season not afew years down the line. IF we do buy him without any other wingers think he will be into the squad ?

Expand  

Doubt it.  At another club?  Probably.  Here?  Not really.  We have Boga and Musonda as well.  Depends how he gets on in training, I suppose.  I just don't remember the last time we bought an "unknown" and he didn't go on loan (or was dumped 12 months later).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Really disappointed with him in the CS. Paassenger in the game and an absolutely needless tackle that gave that con-ref a choice. I think it is safe to say he lost us that "trophy" and more importantly that we lost to one of our biggest rivals in a really embarrassing fashion. After the season he has had he should have done better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 07/08/2017 at 09:11, Magic Lamps said:

Really disappointed with him in the CS. Paassenger in the game and an absolutely needless tackle that gave that con-ref a choice. I think it is safe to say he lost us that "trophy" and more importantly that we lost to one of our biggest rivals in a really embarrassing fashion. After the season he has had he should have done better. 

Expand  

I got no problem with his attitude. That tackle was full of work rate, passion and commitement. Yes, sometimes playing like that will get you sent of, but I prefer that then to have him jogging around waiting for our team to win a ball. And it was for a yellow card anyway.

I have a conspiracy theory, red card was given in order to increase probability of penalties so they could be tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 07/08/2017 at 09:16, Sh0n3x said:

I got no problem with his attitude. That tackle was full of work rate, passion and commitement. Yes, sometimes playing like that will get you sent of, but I prefer that then to have him jogging around waiting for our team to win a ball. And it was for a yellow card anyway.

I have a conspiracy theory, red card was given in order to increase probability of penalties so they could be tested.

Expand  

maybe you are right. But the tackle was reckless with open studs nowhere near the ball. There was no need to foul the player we were in full control of the match they did not get a sniff of our goal. If he does not make that tackle we win the match. And it was not that Pedro was any useful in the match. He was going to be subbed off anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You