Chelsea4 1,521 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 This would be a dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea4 1,521 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Man United have no interest in signing Danny Rose. (Sky) COME ON CHELSEA! SIGN HIM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yipo 56 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 go to manchester united i guess no chance spur sell to us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzy_Vance 454 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Would be a huge signing but Spurs wouldn't sell for less than £80m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 That baldy twat Levy would rather sell rose to Accrington Stanley on a free than sell him to chelsea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 I actually think this could happen but it would need Rose to really push this through. This is a dangerous game for Spurs, their wage budget is so strict that everything could fall apart if they don't manage it; having unhappy players in the camp I think is a far bigger negative for their club structure than it would be say for ourselves. They have Ben Davies who played admirably last season. Remember Spurs went on their end of season run without Danny Rose and they may be more open to letting him go not to upset the apple cart, when they already have a ready made replacement at the club. It's easy saying they won't sell to us, but ultimately City have brought their full backs and if United aren't interested, we would be the team to make a play for him. If he's unhappy and we're willing to pay the money, I believe they would sell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Kaplan- 410 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 At least if we don't get him, it will unsettle him for the game...............right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 34 minutes ago, the wes said: That baldy twat Levy would rather sell rose to Accrington Stanley on a free than sell him to chelsea Although you exaggerated for effect i don't believe that atall. The reason he held so firm with Modric is due to what a huge gamechanger it would have been, Modric is one of the best CM's in the world and by himself would have elevated us up a level like Hazard has done. As good as he is Rose isn't the same type and if a deals right for all parties something could happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akgw13 867 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 6 minutes ago, Tomo said: Although you exaggerated for effect i don't believe that atall. The reason he held so firm with Modric is due to what a huge gamechanger it would have been, Modric is one of the best CM's in the world and by himself would have elevated us up a level like Hazard has done. As good as he is Rose isn't the same type and if a deals right for all parties something could happen. i am slightly more optimistic due to the fact that Spurs run a tight ship with their salary structure. Having an upset player speaking out does NOT help that. I think for the right price (40-45m) we could actually get this done, if we are indeed interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 It'll be modric all over again I'm afraid. Just don't see it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 6 hours ago, Chelsea4 said: Man United have no interest in signing Danny Rose. (Sky) COME ON CHELSEA! SIGN HIM! Can we stop this kind of nonsense? Everyday now I see this kind of thing: X team is not interested in Y ("oh, we should sign Y"). Z team ended the pursuit for K. ("wow, the board would stupid if they don't buy K"). We were never linked with Danny Rose. This kind of post is completely pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,582 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Daniel Levy facing difficult questions about Tottenham's wage structure after Danny Rose challenge http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/08/10/daniel-levy-facing-difficult-questions-tottenhams-wage-structure/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhForAGreavsie 6,092 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 6 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said: I actually think this could happen but it would need Rose to really push this through. This is a dangerous game for Spurs, their wage budget is so strict that everything could fall apart if they don't manage it; having unhappy players in the camp I think is a far bigger negative for their club structure than it would be say for ourselves. They have Ben Davies who played admirably last season. Remember Spurs went on their end of season run without Danny Rose and they may be more open to letting him go not to upset the apple cart, when they already have a ready made replacement at the club. It's easy saying they won't sell to us, but ultimately City have brought their full backs and if United aren't interested, we would be the team to make a play for him. If he's unhappy and we're willing to pay the money, I believe they would sell. Liverpool are probably in the market for a left back. They were touted to be interested in Goulham at the start of the window. Don't follow their gossip so don't know if that is still brewing, but I could see them taking an interest in Rose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mccg 1,528 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 7 hours ago, the wes said: That baldy twat Levy would rather sell rose to Accrington Stanley on a free than sell him to chelsea Accrington Stanley (Who Are They) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgYP1d5nN2o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superblue 6,372 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 29 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said: Liverpool are probably in the market for a left back. They were touted to be interested in Goulham at the start of the window. Don't follow their gossip so don't know if that is still brewing, but I could see them taking an interest in Rose. Did they not buy the left back from hull? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,582 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 BREAKING: Chelsea & Tottenham have agreed a deal for Danny Rose. They've agreed it will never happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 1 hour ago, mccg said: Accrington Stanley (Who Are They) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgYP1d5nN2o Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAM09 7,069 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Did they not buy the left back from hull?Yep. They signed Robertson, so it will probably be a battle between us or Utd. Can somehow see Rose joining Utd & Shaw moving to us as a result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts