Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Danny Rose

ZanSnake

By ZanSnake,
in Transfer Archives

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Superblue

Superblue 6,372

Posted
Posted

I actually think this could happen but it would need Rose to really push this through.

This is a dangerous game for Spurs, their wage budget is so strict that everything could fall apart if they don't manage it; having unhappy players in the camp I think is a far bigger negative for their club structure than it would be say for ourselves.

They have Ben Davies who played admirably last season. Remember Spurs went on their end of season run without Danny Rose and they may be more open to letting him go not to upset the apple cart, when they already have a ready made replacement at the club.

It's easy saying they won't sell to us, but ultimately City have brought their full backs and if United aren't interested, we would be the team to make a play for him. If he's unhappy and we're willing to pay the money, I believe they would sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomo

Tomo 21,751

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, the wes said:

That baldy twat Levy would rather sell rose to Accrington Stanley on a free than sell him to chelsea 

Although you exaggerated for effect i don't believe that atall. The reason he held so firm with Modric is due to what a huge gamechanger it would have been, Modric is one of the best CM's in the world and by himself would have elevated us up a level like Hazard has done.

As good as he is Rose isn't the same type and if a deals right for all parties something could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
akgw13

akgw13 867

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Although you exaggerated for effect i don't believe that atall. The reason he held so firm with Modric is due to what a huge gamechanger it would have been, Modric is one of the best CM's in the world and by himself would have elevated us up a level like Hazard has done.

As good as he is Rose isn't the same type and if a deals right for all parties something could happen.

i am slightly more optimistic due to the fact that Spurs run a tight ship with their salary structure. Having an upset player speaking out does NOT help that. I think for the right price (40-45m) we could actually get this done, if we are indeed interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Henrique

Henrique 9,133

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Chelsea4 said:

  Man United have no interest in signing Danny Rose. (Sky) COME ON CHELSEA! SIGN HIM!

Can we stop this kind of nonsense? Everyday now I see this kind of thing: X team is not interested in Y ("oh, we should sign Y"). Z team ended the pursuit for K. ("wow, the board would stupid if they don't buy K").

We were never linked with Danny Rose. This kind of post is completely pointless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OhForAGreavsie

OhForAGreavsie 6,057

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said:

I actually think this could happen but it would need Rose to really push this through.

This is a dangerous game for Spurs, their wage budget is so strict that everything could fall apart if they don't manage it; having unhappy players in the camp I think is a far bigger negative for their club structure than it would be say for ourselves.

They have Ben Davies who played admirably last season. Remember Spurs went on their end of season run without Danny Rose and they may be more open to letting him go not to upset the apple cart, when they already have a ready made replacement at the club.

It's easy saying they won't sell to us, but ultimately City have brought their full backs and if United aren't interested, we would be the team to make a play for him. If he's unhappy and we're willing to pay the money, I believe they would sell.

Liverpool are probably in the market for a left back. They were touted to be interested in Goulham at the start of the window. Don't follow their gossip so don't know if that is still brewing, but I could see them taking an interest in Rose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Superblue

Superblue 6,372

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Liverpool are probably in the market for a left back. They were touted to be interested in Goulham at the start of the window. Don't follow their gossip so don't know if that is still brewing, but I could see them taking an interest in Rose.

Did they not buy the left back from hull?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LAM09

LAM09 7,043

Posted
Posted
Did they not buy the left back from hull?
Yep. They signed Robertson, so it will probably be a battle between us or Utd. Can somehow see Rose joining Utd & Shaw moving to us as a result.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter