supporter 3,088 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 As I mentioned before, it's not that simple. United have one of the largest stadiums in England, their global brand is probably the biggest in English football and so they're a sponsor's ideal club. Their following is massive where ever you go and their shirt sales probably outdo most clubs in Europe (bar the obvious giants).We're in a very limited position. Our commercial revenue only increases due to TV deals and our stadium revenue barely go up by 0.5% a year due to the limited capacity of our stadium. While our global reach continues to grow in Asia and Africa, we're still behind most giant clubs. In that sense, we need sponsorship more than they need us. That's why for now we have to accept such low offers behind the likes of United & City.. We're doing better than Liverpool which does actually speak volumes considering their global brand. Totally agree with you. This is difficult to understand thinking only with passion. But all you say is true.But I think that only £ 25 million is ridiculous. Perhaps £ 50 would be too demanding for our part now, considering how little economic performance that we can take the bridge and our current global impact in terms of publicity about as powerful markets like Asia or America.Step by step we are a bigger club, but maybe it's too early for us to ask for £ 50 million, but I think £ 25 is a little ridiculous amount, but teams like Real Madrid receive a similar amount but also the Premier League is a much larger and many more commercial league.In this thread supply Yokohama discussed Runners Company with an amount of £ 30/40 million. Maybe that number is closer to the value of the Chelsea brand.Also a signing like Messi would suppose for us the final impetus for us to be important in markets such as Asia and America definitely.I also commented in another thread in this forum about the poor performance we get with our field revenue each year, and I talked about the possibility of upgrading the field as they have done or will do teams like Bayern or Real Madrid. But many forum members told me that to make changes in the Bridge is very complicated by legal building permits in London (I do not know a lot about this topic because I've only been in London for short periods of time). And sell the Stamford Bridge stadium and build a new stadium is too complicated for emotional reasons.I will put the link from another topic where talk of possible changes at Stamford Bridge to improve its economic performance if anyone wants to comment. .http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/9808-the-stamford-bridge-thread/page-77Regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strong centreback 157 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I'm not sure it's as complicated as that, I think it's just the way the Samsung deals were sorted, if you tie in for too long then you will fall behind rivals who go for shorter deals, chelsea should be in a strong position to get more than arsenal (30m) we are more successful on the pitch over last decade and are more likely of the 2 to be successful over the next decade, sponsors want to have their brand on a winning teams shirt so the big clubs who win the most trophies get the best deals, Man Utd are the most successful club in England over last 20 years so will get the best paid deals, we will always be second for a while yet and before the new deals for arsenal liverpool and the like we were second. The Man Utd deal only serves as a reference point for our upper limit the arsenal one as our lower limit I'd say 40m is market value for our club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadenza666 221 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 the watermark lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 the watermark lol next time I put any photos up I'm watermarking the shit out of them. Cheeky fuckers will do anything for some randomers to follow them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roquila 1,335 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 My facebook is full of these pictures of the Yokohama shirt. Daylight robbery ! WHS SUE THESE BASTARDS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 Let's see the fuckers steal this one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. 2,742 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Let's see the fuckers steal this one ive had ago at the guy thats clams he 'got the picture in the post'- for you mate lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando 6,602 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Let's see the fuckers steal this one Seeing it like that it does look class as compare to Turkish Airlines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 ive had ago at the guy thats clams he 'got the picture in the post'- for you mate lol Hahaha some people are unreal let me know if he replies Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Shame I deleted my Twitter or I'd have ripped him to pieces for you mate haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy. 2,742 Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Hahaha some people are unreal let me know if he repliesno response Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eden Hazardous 17 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 I'm a young Chelsea fan and right now my only wish is too see London and watch Chelsea play at least for once.Even though I don't post a lot here, I read the forum. I love the team and you guys.But seriously, those who don't want Turkish airlines, what's your problem with Turk people and the word "Turkish" ? I'll be really delighted to know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obiwan92 217 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 Just some misdirected racism, Eden Hazardous. Not much you could do about it. Welcome to the forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted January 22, 2015 Share Posted January 22, 2015 But seriously, those who don't want Turkish airlines, what's your problem with Turk people and the word "Turkish" ? I'll be really delighted to know.The socialist nature of the brand name is one of the factors, 'Japan tyres' for example would be just as bad. Mainly the Liverpool bird logo and the use of red.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eden Hazardous 17 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 The socialist nature of the brand name is one of the factors, 'Japan tyres' for example would be just as bad. Mainly the Liverpool bird logo and the use of red..The name is just one of the factors and I don't believe it has got much to do with it. People don't even hesitate to say that they personally don't like the name "Turkish." What I am saying is, "Japan Tyres" would not be criticized and judged as much as this. It's a developing company and those who don't want it might regret it in the near future.Besides, to be objective, I like them a lot, but I wouldn't want to see British Airways' or Air France's name on a Turkish team's shirt.'Just some misdirected racism, Eden Hazardous. Not much you could do about it. Welcome to the forum!I know there is nothing to do about it, but it irritates and annoys me a lot.Thanks for the message and warm welcoming! Actually I'm not new around here, I even posted 20-30 posts before, but I don't know why the numbers is 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Would be awesome if we could get Sky TV as our sponsor. But its virtualy impossible, I dont think FA would even allow firm that has rights to broadcast all PL games to be our sponsor because their money share would become biased. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted January 23, 2015 Author Share Posted January 23, 2015 There's another meeting soon with one of the other potential sponsors, not sure who at the minute, I'll let you know when I do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE666 13 Posted January 26, 2015 Share Posted January 26, 2015 Be nice not to have any logos on the shirt. That would never happen though, football is all business these days. Lion Bar would be a good sponsor for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted January 27, 2015 Share Posted January 27, 2015 Be nice not to have any logos on the shirt. That would never happen though, football is all business these days. Lion Bar would be a good sponsor for us. the city and rangers shirts from a few seasons ago with the small sponsor below the badge were ideal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted January 29, 2015 Author Share Posted January 29, 2015 So there has been movement with one of the other sponsors presenting their case. My friend got it wrong. It isn't Malaysian Airlines, he somehow got the mixed up with someone else....But who? It's atrocious I tell you. Absolute eyesore. Yokohama still leading the way mind you.LET THE GUESSING COMMENCE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.