Controversial football opinions

[iseah100 5,612]

no, not Tennis

Or boxing, or golf. But there's nothing wrong with individual awards.

[Yeboii 1,844]

no, not Tennis

I'm pretty sure that in Tennis you can play doubles

[Fulham Broadway 16,393]

A shame there is an inordinate amount of over po faced anally retentive man-love opinions on forums of footballers that these people feel proves their support more worthy than others.

[We Hate Scouse 10,260]

Eden Hazard is overrated.

[xPetrCechx 13,547]

Steve G is underrated.

[Spike 12,049]

Being forced to play wide to accommodate Lampard in his natural attacking midfielder role also didn't help.

Owen Hargreves as well had everything to be a great.

Except knees.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Harry Redknapp's wife wouldn't have scored that chance that Bent missed

[Myself 793]

Eden Hazard is overrated.

Really? I thought he was underrated.

Anyway, imo Jese is better than Bale.

[kellzfresh 7,226]

An injury free brazilian Ronaldo is better than cronaldo and on par with Messi.

[nyikolajevics 2,422]

An injury free brazilian Ronaldo is better than cronaldo and on par with Messi.

Even in his best days, Ronaldo never managed to score as many goals as Messi or Cristiano.. He was fantastic player, an icon of the early 2000s but Leo and Cristiano are better imo.

[Nike 373]

Even in his best days, Ronaldo never managed to score as many goals as Messi or Cristiano.. He was fantastic player, an icon of the early 2000s but Leo and Cristiano are better imo.

lol.

kids these days..

An injury free brazilian Ronaldo is by far the best of all time

[Nike 373]

The second best player in this generation is Philip Lahm, not Cristiano Ronaldo.

[nyikolajevics 2,422]

lol.

kids these days..

Sure, back in your days everything was better..

I've been following football since 2000, I saw Ronaldo play in two World Cups and in Inter and Real Madrid. He was the best striker back then, sure, but how is he better that Messi or Cristiano?

Barcelona: 37 matches 34 goals

Inter: 68 matches 49 goals

Real Madrid: 127 matches 83 goals

Brazil: 98 matches 62 goals

These stats are unbelievable but CR's and Messi's are even better.

[Nike 373]

Sure, back in your days everything was better..

I've been following football since 2000, I saw Ronaldo play in two World Cups and in Inter and Real Madrid. He was the best striker back then, sure, but how is he better that Messi or Cristiano?

Barcelona: 37 matches 34 goals

Inter: 68 matches 49 goals

Real Madrid: 127 matches 83 goals

Brazil: 98 matches 62 goals

These stats are unbelievable but CR's and Messi's are even better.

Goals are everything these days to kids...

Neymar going to surpass both messi and cristiano in goal records...I hope than you say the same thing about goals=greatest and guess how many goals Romario has???

With your logic, Lampard is by far the best mdifielder in history.

[nyikolajevics 2,422]

With your logic, Lampard is by far the best mdifielder in history.

Ronaldo was a striker so goals are his most important stats. A stirker can only be world class if he scores a shitload of goals.

Rating a midfielder is more complicated: key passes, assists, interceptions, the way he controls the team etc etc.. Makelele was a world class midfielder even though he scored about 3 goals for Chelsea, but Ronaldo is a striker so yes, goals are everything.

Neymar is only 22 so it's early to compare him to Ronaldo. He can still win 3 World Cups and score 100 goals for Brazil. Who would say Ronaldo was better then?

[Nike 373]

Ronaldo was a striker so goals are his most important stats. A stirker can only be world class if he scores a shitload of goals.

Rating a midfielder is more complicated: key passes, assists, interceptions, the way he controls the team etc etc.. Makelele was a world class midfielder even though he scored about 3 goals for Chelsea, but Ronaldo is a striker so yes, goals are everything.

Neymar is only 22 so it's early to compare him to Ronaldo. He can still win 3 World Cups and score 100 goals for Brazil. Who would say Ronaldo was better then?

So, by your logic, drogba was shit than.

Everyone would say neymar is better than messi/cristiano, just like how yound kids today think messi/cristiano are the greatest players ever. New generation, new kids and new players to look up to.

[nyikolajevics 2,422]

So, by your logic, drogba was shit than.

Everyone would say neymar is better than messi/cristiano, just like how yound kids today think messi/cristiano are the greatest players ever. New generation, new kids and new players to look up to.

Drogba scored more than 150 goals for Chelsea and 65 for Ivory Coast. He was the top scorer of Premier League two times, that's why we love him. Still, no one will consider him one of the greatests of the history.

[kellzfresh 7,226]

Even in his best days, Ronaldo never managed to score as many goals as Messi or Cristiano.. He was fantastic player, an icon of the early 2000s but Leo and Cristiano are better imo.

The only thing CR7 had over ronaldo is heading ability. If you watched ronaldo closely you won't say this publicly to anyone that started watching football from 1994.

By the time ronaldo got to Madrid, injuries had finished him and he wasn't the same again, that's why I said "injury free ronaldo" is better.