Diego Costa

[The Skipper 20,609]

If Real got a new striker and Benzema was on the market, I'd 100% want CFC to go after him. Eden having someone like that to play up front with would be devastating, instead he's stuck with this turd that doesn't want to be here. Imagine we got in Sanchez as well?

Hazard - Benzema - Sanchez forward line is insane.

[Unionjack 7,531]

Chelsea striker Diego Costa escapes FA ban for challenge on Vincent Kompany

DIEGO COSTA will not face any action for his studs up challenge on Vincent Kompany.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/603438/Chelsea-Man-City-Diego-Costa-Vincent-Kompany-FA-ban-Mike-Dean

[Styles 9,790]

Genuinely can't stand him now. If he isn't breaking down every move with a bad touch / foul he is being a brain dead idiot. We might as well be playing with 10 men. We will never do anything in Europe with this clown leading the line.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

7 hours ago, The Skipper said:

If Real got a new striker and Benzema was on the market, I'd 100% want CFC to go after him. Eden having someone like that to play up front with would be devastating, instead he's stuck with this turd that doesn't want to be here. Imagine we got in Sanchez as well?

Hazard - Benzema - Sanchez forward line is insane.

Meh...Benz, Lukaku, Morata,...neither impresses me to say wow if we sign any of them. Anyone would be better than Costa on current form. But he should not be compared to others in current form. Would Benzema be better than current Costa? Indeed. But would he be better than Costa in his best form? Not even close.

If we are targeting a new striker, then we should target someone who will be even better than Costa on his best day.

Good luck finding such striker this summer.

Lukaku to me still looks big fish small pond type of striker. He might be banging them goals, but his character is way off what you expect from leader. Morata is good but isnt lone striker. Benzema is benzema...very good on good day, but inconsistent as hell. Auba is the same. Belotti and Lacazette are unproven. Who else is there? We definately need someone near prime, experienced leader, but I dont see anyone fit that profile.

I realy like the way Mbappe is developing, but he must stay in Monaco, he is too young for big club.

Its a real shame Costa till january was the perfect striker we could possibly have. I still think he will return in form, no worry about that at all. But in long term we need a reliable striker indeed.

[Gilvorak 3,734]

If we sign Alexis Sanchez (longshot) we could play him at CF.

[Chelsea? 892]

49 minutes ago, Gilvorak said:

If we sign Alexis Sanchez (longshot) we could play him at CF.

Please no. 

[The Skipper 20,609]

4 hours ago, BlueLyon said:

Meh...Benz, Lukaku, Morata,...neither impresses me to say wow if we sign any of them. Anyone would be better than Costa on current form. But he should not be compared to others in current form. Would Benzema be better than current Costa? Indeed. But would he be better than Costa in his best form? Not even close.

If we are targeting a new striker, then we should target someone who will be even better than Costa on his best day.

Good luck finding such striker this summer.

Lukaku to me still looks big fish small pond type of striker. He might be banging them goals, but his character is way off what you expect from leader. Morata is good but isnt lone striker. Benzema is benzema...very good on good day, but inconsistent as hell. Auba is the same. Belotti and Lacazette are unproven. Who else is there? We definately need someone near prime, experienced leader, but I dont see anyone fit that profile.

I realy like the way Mbappe is developing, but he must stay in Monaco, he is too young for big club.

Its a real shame Costa till january was the perfect striker we could possibly have. I still think he will return in form, no worry about that at all. But in long term we need a reliable striker indeed.

I think Benzema at his best is better than Diego at his best tbh. But that's subjective.

The main difference is that when Benzema is off form he still contributes hugely to the team. 

[Gilvorak 3,734]

4 hours ago, Chelsea? said:

Please no. 

Why not?

[Chelsea? 892]

7 hours ago, Gilvorak said:

Why not?

He wouldn't be an upgrade for our CF position. He's a great winger but only a good striker. Don't wanna spend 50mil to play someone out of position. 

[Gilvorak 3,734]

7 hours ago, Chelsea? said:

He wouldn't be an upgrade for our CF position. He's a great winger but only a good striker. Don't wanna spend 50mil to play someone out of position. 

His highest rated performances this season have come at Centre Forward according to Whoscored. Seems like you're talking out of your arse.

[Tomo 21,751]

On April 1, 2017 at 9:01 PM, nono said:

We have made lots of terrible purchases. Mutu, Crespo, Kezman, Torres, Schevchenko just off the top of my head. 

There is a lot of money in the Premier League but it's all chasing a lot of mediocre players. The real top quality ones go to Madrid/Barcelona/Bayern. Look at the strikers of those teams. They only buy the cream of the cream in terms of talent while we waste our funds on dross. Batshuayi is another pointless signing. 

Other leagues are probably having a laugh at the Premier League teams and the funds their throwing at donkeys. Stones 50m pounds. Martial 60m pounds. And there was a story that Lukaku and Barkley are going to go for 100m pounds combined. The fact that someone can suggest this possibility without being ridiculed shows how crazy things have gotten. 

Summer transfer window is crucial but I hope they don't fuck it up on poor players. 

 

Why the hell is Crespo on that list? He WASN'T a flop.

On April 1, 2017 at 9:19 PM, The Skipper said:

Wouldn't include Martial in there because he has top ability, just being massively wasted at United and Jose the Youth killer. In fact, I'd take him at CFC, would be fantastic with Hazard. But yeah, agree with the rest of your post fully.

Puts into perspective just how good Eden is to shine so highly under Jose given Martial, Mata and Miki's struggles under him.

[Tomo 21,751]

For all his fault's, Costa leading the line has produced 2 title's in 3 years for his team's and close to being 3 in 4. He may only show top form for half a season but often that's enough. Without meaning to sound like an AKB from North London we should be careful what we wish for.

[Fernando 6,585]

27 minutes ago, Tomo said:

For all his fault's, Costa leading the line has produced 2 title's in 3 years for his team's and close to being 3 in 4. He may only show top form for half a season but often that's enough. Without meaning to sound like an AKB from North London we should be careful what we wish for.

I want Costa to stay and sign a new contract. 

However if he is really intent on leaving to China I would let him go. 

[11Drogba 2,000]

A lot of strikers are good for only half a season in PL. That's why you don't see English clubs going the distance in Europe.

[Tomo 21,751]

10 minutes ago, Mana said:

...please stop it. We haven't won 2 titles in 3 years with Costa in the team. This season doesn't count until it's mathematically impossible for other clubs to catch us.

That's enough? Complete speculation if you are including this season. Last season, absolutely dreadful from start to finish, first season - Hazard had to carry the torch for the remainder of the season. .

That's why i said close to being. Last season he improved vastly when Hiddink returned, first season scored at almost a rate of a goal a game for half a season. If we can replace him with good quality, ok fine, but i remember all too well having to send out an SOS to a semi retired Eto'o because we couldn't get anyone better and our current forward's were flaking harder than 99s. We are complaining now about a striker having a average half a season after a great first half, not long ago we were complaining about strikers having shit full seasons.

16 minutes ago, Mana said:

Be careful what you wish for? That can go both ways. Remember Mourinho fans last season here saying we should stick with him? 

Costa is a good striker, but he is not good enough to take us to that level. As I said, imagine if we had CL at this stage. We need everyone to be at least 80% at their best. Costa has proven so far since he came to Chelsea that he couldn't handle it at this stage of the season.

Jose's second coming at Chelsea was dead from the Southampton match onwards and it quickly became apparent to anyone who wasn't thinking 100% with there heart, the Costa situation isn't even 5% as perriless, come on. Can he take us to the next level? I have my doubts but i'd certainly rather gamble on him than some of the strikers linked as replacement's.