Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Mohamed Salah

kobematabryant

By kobematabryant,
in Midfielders

 Share

Recommended Posts

Thendo

Thendo 1,088

Posted
Posted

What I don't understand atm is how Liverpool can improve their offer when ours already had been accepted?

"Chelsea Football Club can confirm an agreement has been reached with FC Basel for the transfer of their 21-year-old attacking midfielder Mohamed Salah.

The move is subject to the Egyptian international agreeing personal terms and completing a medical examination."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Mustafa
Mustafa
Mohammed Seif
Mohammed Seif

MY MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN MOHAMED SALAH.............God bless you kid. Hope you keep going this way and improve. He has much more than this, I hope he becomes consistent. This is his first match and I ho

MIDOKA
MIDOKA

BTW, I'm a huge fan of Chelsea since 2004, signing Salah makes Chelsea the number 1 here in Egypt, now everyone here looks like a Chelsea fan, and that's annoying me alot, cuz supporting Chelsea was a

Posted Images

Jype

Jype 6,398

Posted
Posted

What I don't understand atm is how Liverpool can improve their offer when ours already had been accepted?

"Chelsea Football Club can confirm an agreement has been reached with FC Basel for the transfer of their 21-year-old attacking midfielder Mohamed Salah.

The move is subject to the Egyptian international agreeing personal terms and completing a medical examination."

Exactly. Surely Liverpool could just match our bid, get it accepted by Basel and then let the player decide who he wants to join (which yesterday Mourinho said was Chelsea). Why would Liverpool offer more than us when clearly our bid was already right where Basel valued the player at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dee25

dee25 1,044

Posted
Posted

It's obviously not true guys. The fee has already been agreed. Mourinho said on Friday that the paperwork has been signed between Chelsea and Basel. Everything has been agreed. It's just formalities left. There's really nothing Liverpool can do unless the player suddenly changes his mind, but for Chelsea to announce that an agreement is in place then they obviously are confident that the player wants to join the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thendo

Thendo 1,088

Posted
Posted

Exactly. Surely Liverpool could just match our bid, get it accepted by Basel and then let the player decide who he wants to join (which yesterday Mourinho said was Chelsea). Why would Liverpool offer more than us when clearly our bid was already right where Basel valued the player at?

I call Daily Mail bs. We wouldn't have announced it if not Basel accepted the deal and put it to paper, the only thing that could stop it would be Salah not wanting to join but that has nothing to do with Liverpool making a bigger bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

I smell bullshit. Surely Basel can't go back on their word now after both clubs had already announced agreeing on the fee and they had allowed the player to discuss personal terms and take a medical?

Exactly. Surely Liverpool could just match our bid, get it accepted by Basel and then let the player decide who he wants to join (which yesterday Mourinho said was Chelsea). Why would Liverpool offer more than us when clearly our bid was already right where Basel valued the player at?

Yeah I don't think they can reject it after accepting. Thinking about the Willian case, after we bid for him Anzhi didn't subsequently reject Tottenham's offer - I don't think they would have been allowed to. They just left it to Willian to decide who to choose. This story seems like typical BS from the Daily Mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

If this guy comes, there'll be a part of every Chelsea fan that'll blame him for the dismissal of Juan Mata.

No there won't... Like Mourinho said, the club sought a replacement after deciding to sell Mata. It's not as though Salah was bought and then Mata was forced out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sdrcfc

sdrcfc 461

Posted
Posted

No there won't... Like Mourinho said, the club sought a replacement after deciding to sell Mata. It's not as though Salah was bought and then Mata was forced out.

Doesn't explain why the Mata transfer was delayed, if the Salah deal didn't go through earlier then Mata wouldn't have left so early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

Doesn't explain why the Mata transfer was delayed, if the Salah deal didn't go through earlier then Mata wouldn't have left so early.

Salah is just a replacement for the 2 departing AMs in Mata and De Bruyne. If he didn't come in someone else would have so I don't see why you want to blame him. Even though the majority of fans don't I'd think that if you're looking for someone to blame then it would surely be Willian, who took Mata's place in the starting 11, or Mourinho, who didn't play him much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YouNameIt

YouNameIt 1,511

Posted
Posted

Anyone who isnt a dumbfuck will realize that this guy has nothing to do with the Mata-situation.

1. They dont play the same position.

2. We sell Mata because we want to buy Salah. <--- Read this out loud 5 times. Then think about it for two seconds and realize how stuipid it sounds.

3. Salah is here for competition at the right wing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zolayes

zolayes 14,489

Posted
Posted

Anyone who isnt a dumbfuck will realize that this guy has nothing to do with the Mata-situation.

1. They dont play the same position.

2. We sell Mata because we want to buy Salah. <--- Read this out loud 5 times. Then think about it for two seconds and realize how stuipid it sounds.

3. Salah is here for competition at the right wing.

agree ,, he is more a replacement for kdb

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

Oh god the Daily Star is arguably one of the only papers less reliable than the Daily Mail. Not sure if we can trust either tbh but the Daily Star's reporting of the details in the Salah transfer (£12m) certainly seems a lot more believable.

In all honesty though, I can't remember a Mourinho signing that has failed apart from Quaresma. He has a great track record in spotting talent.

Sidwell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter