Jump to content

Marco van Ginkel


Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

disagree with the reasons above as I hardly think Mikel is a chelsea or any remotely top club player. However, the problem isn't so much quality, but characteristics. Ginkel looks like a player who does better a bit up in the field, unless he's been doing what asked and can play a more defensive role, in which case then he should def replace mikel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Robguima said:

disagree with the reasons above as I hardly think Mikel is a chelsea or any remotely top club player. However, the problem isn't so much quality, but characteristics. Ginkel looks like a player who does better a bit up in the field, unless he's been doing what asked and can play a more defensive role, in which case then he should def replace mikel.

If we wanted someone that could play the defensive backup role in midfield, we should have kept Romeu. 

Van Ginkel has quality but he wouldn't be able to cover for Cesc defensively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reddish-Blue said:

If we wanted someone that could play the defensive backup role in midfield, we should have kept Romeu. 

Van Ginkel has quality but he wouldn't be able to cover for Cesc defensively. 

agreed, but we don't do that and haven't had adequate cover forever. The top clubs have no mikels in their rosters: only we, liverpool, and united do.

Matic had a poor season, did mikel provide adequate cover? How did we play? Hazard was subpar, so who stepped up? My point is that if we say we are ok with mikel coming on, and often like last season, then anything goes: ginkel and others could do such a role.

I'd prefer we had 2 similar players for every position (or at least cover) but that's not how the club is run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Robguima said:

agreed, but we don't do that and haven't had adequate cover forever. The top clubs have no mikels in their rosters: only we, liverpool, and united do.

Matic had a poor season, did mikel provide adequate cover? How did we play? Hazard was subpar, so who stepped up? My point is that if we say we are ok with mikel coming on, and often like last season, then anything goes: ginkel and others could do such a role.

I'd prefer we had 2 similar players for every position (or at least cover) but that's not how the club is run.

We used to have cover for defence, midfield and attack (Ferreira could play RB/LB, Ramires was like a jack-of-all-trades midfielder & Kalou played his part as the backup winger/striker) until 2012/2013.

I feel the club was a bit short-sighted with the return of Mourinho.  Most of our potential squad depth was sold off to win one title in 3 seasons and now we're back to square one with another new manager. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
On 10/07/2016 at 11:18 AM, Reddish-Blue said:

We used to have cover for defence, midfield and attack (Ferreira could play RB/LB, Ramires was like a jack-of-all-trades midfielder & Kalou played his part as the backup winger/striker) until 2012/2013.

I feel the club was a bit short-sighted with the return of Mourinho.  Most of our potential squad depth was sold off to win one title in 3 seasons and now we're back to square one with another new manager. 

 

I'm not a big lover of utility players.

I'd much rather have a player that has trained al his life for one position and he knows just what he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/09/2016 at 8:04 PM, Special Juan said:

Basically he's fucked.

Is that a new diagnosis lol , it would be refreshing if every doctor was that blunt n basic. No luck that dude,just hope n pray Zouma dosn't have his karma or we will be even more cfcucked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Scored vs Soton U23.

Shame he's so injury prone, he's good player. He had very good time in PSV last season and I think he could be very good option for our team even as a squad player, but given his injuries history he maybe wont play single game for Chelsea first team ever again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You