Jump to content

🇩🇪 André Schürrle


incometax
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 or 4 different people quoting the telegraph on twitter as I said but I can't see it anywhere.

It's here mate, at the bottom of the page.

http://www.telegraph...-the-board.html

Oddly enough it says that Schurrle to us would mean Sturridge out on loan, which makes even less sense than us selling him...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great question. Fella on twitter announced it (que mass outcry) but I can't find it. Asked for confirmation

http://www.telegraph...-the-board.html

Bayer Leverkusen striker Andre Schurrle looks set to join before the transfer window closes at 11pm on Friday in a deal approaching £20 million, a move that might even see Daniel Sturridge allowed to move out on loan. Yossi Benayoun and Florent Malouda are, though, likelier to move on.

The fuck? Sturridge sure as hell is not going on loan, so I wouldn't read much into the whole Schurrle thing either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great question. Fella on twitter announced it (que mass outcry) but I can't find it. Asked for confirmation

Found it.

http://www.telegraph...-the-board.html

Bayer Leverkusen striker Andre Schurrle looks set to join before the transfer window closes at 11pm on Friday in a deal approaching £20 million, a move that might even see Daniel Sturridge allowed to move out on loan. Yossi Benayoun and Florent Malouda are, though, likelier to move on.

It's being mentioned right down there under a different news. No wonder can't find the link.

EDIT: BAH, beaten by Slam Dunk and Pr22(again!). :rant:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's here mate, at the bottom of the page.

http://www.telegraph...-the-board.html

Oddly enough it says that Schurrle to us would mean Sturridge out on loan, which makes even less sense than us selling him...

that'll be it but didn't leverkusen just get rid of a striker today? What's the likelihood of them selling another
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have only 2 strikers, so if we sign a winger, we might even let one of them on loan.

Seems legit. :halo:

I see Schurrle more as a striker than as a winger. But still, that would make absolutely no sense and we are yet to hear news about Danny's contract situation. One or two years left? If only one, then sending a player like that on loan would make even less sense. Not buying any of that bullshit as of yet.

edit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/aug/30/chelsea-loan-daniel-sturrudge-andre-schurrle?CMP=twt_gu

Guardian also jumping on the 'Sturridge on loan if Schurrle signs' bandwagon. How fucking stupid are those journalists? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...