👕 Chelsea Kits Thread

[gary gordon 1,777]

Our bench will be the same colour as City's shirts when we visit the Etihad, almost like a tribute.Anyways, not the biggest of deals, just don't know why (of all the colour options available) they picked the current champions. Meh..

Not necessarily. We did have two different colour training kits this season. Dark Blue and white.

[Wxgba 306]

I like the kit, don't get me wrong, but I'd definitely prefer it if it was to have a buttoned neck.

[NiclasCFC 2,582]

Sports Direct

just saw that they sell the nr 8 shirt with Wilshere on the back... Know any other place?

[We Hate Scouse 10,326]

just saw that they sell the nr 8 shirt with Wilshere on the back... Know any other place?

http://www.lillywhites.com/nike-england-home-stadium-shirt-2014-371209?colcode=37120901

You could add personalisation on there? Failing that Kitbag have Lampard 8

[DJames 729]

Looks like Arsenal kit

[nachikethas 1,154]

absolutely going to buy yellow kit. just freaking awsome

[kmk108 1,186]

Wikipedia

I hope not. I hate the weird third kits. Blue for home; yellow for away; and black, white or red for third.

[Sidzeret 2,257]

I hope not. I hate the weird third kits. Blue for home; yellow for away; and black, white or red for third.

Red? Seriously?

But adidas is bound to fuck up the third kit after two awesome shirts for home and away.

[EBH 283]

Everton are not direct rivals.

Us and City are the new Barca/Real of the Premier League. We could have had ANY colour for those staff and training kits, but Adidas chose City blue, smh.

City have far bigger rivals than Chelsea, and vice versa. The two clubs haven't even directly competed for a trophy yet. When Chelsea have looked like or have won the league, City were nowhere to be seen, and the same applies for when the latter has been in the ascendancy. Sure you could cite this season but I think everybody knew a long time before the end of the season that Chelsea were out of the race.

[Term-X 7,891]

City have far bigger rivals than Chelsea, and vice versa. The two clubs haven't even directly competed for a trophy yet. When Chelsea have looked like or have won the league, City were nowhere to be seen, and the same applies for when the latter has been in the ascendancy. Sure you could cite this season but I think everybody knew a long time before the end of the season that Chelsea were out of the race.

City are a small club that were fighting relegation not long ago, so no.. they don't have FAR bigger rivals (you make them sound like Real Madrid). City's 'rivarly' with United is geographical not competitive, until very recently.

[nofacej 132]

People (esp. media) like to make the comparison between us and City due to the whole billionaire owner thing.

I could be wrong (not (m)any City fans out here that are my age) but I imagine most City fans view the City/Chelsea match as the second biggest of the season after United for that reason.

I know I certainly enjoy it when we beat City. It kind of feels like the older brother putting the younger brother in his place.

There was also the whole Bridge/Terry thing that happened a while back and the Robinho steal.

[Steve 10,227]

[iseah100 5,612]

:'( :'( :'( :'(

It's beautiful

[DoubleO 192]

I hope not. I hate the weird third kits. Blue for home; yellow for away; and black, white or red for third.

[The_Flash 1,144]

:'( :'( :'( :'(

It's beautiful

That's beautiful yet sad having Lampard on it *cries*