Ronaldo 28 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Hazard could eventually be what cassano should of been for Italy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FullEnglishBreakfast Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 The general consensus is that a striker = a CF.I disagree with that...People always considered Messi a Striker when he was played on the right hand side at Barcelona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Finally someone who understands.Quite the random statement there, mate.... I think the majority of this forum agrees Hazard is a great number 10 + agree on the number 9 statement.So no, i dont get what you say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediator 2,026 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Hazard remind me Aguero in front of the goal. He just need to be more consistent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FullEnglishBreakfast Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Hazard could eventually be what cassano should of been for Italy.Could have just used Baggio, Del Piero, and Totti as examples.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Pedro is a striker.Ses is a striker.Ronaldo is a striker.You might be lost in translation but in english football culture, a striker = a CF.Pedro is a forward.Ses (no idea who that is) is a forward.Ronaldo is a forward.I'm very sure the author meant Mata as a number 9, as a CF, and not as a forward, as you can see by the formation he put up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatthemata 249 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 He's too creative and his aim is too assist for goals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FullEnglishBreakfast Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You might be lost in translation but in english football culture, a striker = a CF.Pedro is a forward.Ses(no idea who that is) is a forward.Ronaldo is a forward.I'm very sure the author meant Mata as a number 9, as a CF, and not as a forward, as you can see by the formation he put up.No that is wrong. Striker = Forward in England. A CF is a Striker/Forward but a Striker/Forward does not need to be a CF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I disagree with that...People always considered Messi a Striker when he was played on the right hand side at Barcelona.People have only been calling Messi a striker in recent times in my books due to how he plays at Barcelona now (false 9). Regardless, I'm sure the OP meant it in that sense as you can see by the formation he put up (Mata as a 9/False 9). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,612 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Mata's dribbling ability is nowhere near Hazard. Up-front, Mata will have even lesser space than at CAM. Hazard at CF is a better topic for discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 No that is wrong. Striker = Forward in England. A CF is a Striker/Forward but a Striker/Forward does not need to be a CF.I've never heard someone call Hazard or Mata a striker - in most cases they're either called forwards or attacking midfielders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 OkStriker: well a striker. 10: a playmaker that controls the flow of offensive play. Drifts between midfield and striker. Also called the trequartista. 8: i think more Oscars role. Deeper than Hazard or Mata. More a dee lying playmaker or a regista. 9: deep lying forward that drops down pulling defenders with him. It s very similar to a 10 but he pushes up primarily. So the movement is different. Central forward as a denominator says nothing tactically like the former roles do, it reveals the place on the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo 28 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Funny thing is Mata is always listed as a striker for Spain, yet Silva is always listed as a midfielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FullEnglishBreakfast Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I've never heard someone call Hazard or Mata a striker - in most cases they're either called forwards or attacking midfielders.You'll find in English that positions names are up for interpretation. You only need to talk to a different person to get a different opinion on what positions players actually play in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo 28 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 I've never heard someone call Hazard or Mata a striker - in most cases they're either called forwards or attacking midfielders.Mata a striker for Spain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stingray 9,441 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 He hasn't been used as a 10 at Chelsea. Played there for Belgium a lot I thinkThat is not true, Strike! His first games for us where in that role alternating with Mata. He played deep and central ! I think Wigan and Reading for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mediator 2,026 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 That is not true, Strike!His first games for us where in that role alternating with Mata. He deep and central ! I think Wigan and Reading for sure.Yes and also vs Basel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 You'll find in English that positions names are up for interpretation. You only need to talk to a different person to get a different opinion on what positions players actually play in.Mata a striker for SpainI guess it's down to personal interpretation/experiences. In most cases for me anyway, when discussing with a mate about football, mentioning the word "striker" will bring up names like RvP, Falcao, Cavani, Torres etc. and not Mata, Hazard or Pedro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo 28 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 Could have just used Baggio, Del Piero, and Totti as examples....Cassano had immense ball skills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strike 7,612 Posted May 17, 2013 Share Posted May 17, 2013 That is not true, Strike!His first games for us where in that role alternating with Mata. He played deep and central ! I think Wigan and Reading for sure.Alternating being the key word there. He has played at CAM at various stages of the game and has a tendency to drift central but never had a good run at CAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now